The Intersection of Lesson Study and Design Research: A 3-D Visualization Development Project for the Elementary Mathematics Curriculum

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes how the research methods for developing a 3-D visualization program for elementary children closely resemble the principles of lesson study. While many lesson study experiences offer teachers opportunities for personal professional development to deepen their pedagogical content knowledge, this team’s immediate focus is on students’ mathematical understanding as they engage in research lesson activities that are the basis for development of new materials for the elementary mathematics classroom.

Keywords

Research Team Student Learning Pedagogical Content Knowledge Lesson Study Student Understanding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cochrane-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig, C. J. (2008). Joseph Schwab, self-study of teaching and teacher education practices proponent? A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1993–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 33–48). Genova: Univ. de Genova.Google Scholar
  6. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Lecluse, A. (2005). Geocadabra [Computer software]. Retrieved July 28, 2007, from http://home.casema.nl/alecluse/setupeng.exe
  8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.Google Scholar
  9. National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Presmeg, N. C. (1992). Metaphors, metonymies and imaginative reality in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sack, J., & van Niekerk, R. (2009). Developing the spatial operational capacity of young children using wooden cubes and dynamic simulation software. In T. Craine & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Understanding Geometry for a Changing World: Seventy-first yearbook (pp. 141–154). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  12. Sack, J., & Vazquez, I. (2008). Three-dimensional visualization: Children’s non-conventional verbal representations. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulveda (Eds.). Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 32 and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 4, pp. 217–224). Mexico: Cinvestav-UMSNH.Google Scholar
  13. Tall, D., Gray, E., Bin Ali, M., Crowley, L., DeMarois, P., McGowen, M., Pitta, D., Pinto, M., Thomas, M., & Yusof, Y. (2001). Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(1), 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  15. van Niekerk, (Retha) H. M. (1997). A subject didactical analysis of the development of the spatial knowledge of young children through a problem-centered approach to mathematics teaching and learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Potchefstroom University for CHE, South Africa.Google Scholar
  16. van Niekerk, R. (2006). Build and explore with Geocadabra (J. J. Sack, Trans.) Retrieved July 28, 2007, from http://nsfmli.rice.edu/curriculum/Lecluse/GeocadabraGeobuddyConstructionBoxEnglishTranslation.pdf
  17. Yakimanskaya, I. S. (1991). The development of spatial thinking in school children. In P. S. Wilson & E. J. Davis (Eds. & Trans.), Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education (Vol. 5). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Houston DowntownHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Houston Independent School DistrictHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations