Gauging Causality in Multilevel Models

Chapter

Abstract

This book illustrates strategies for the development and testing of multilevel models bearing on social problems, all of which deal directly or indirectly on aspects of human development, measured by social and economic indicators. It confronts social problems by ideally following these five steps: analyze the roots of the social problem both theoretically and empirically; formulate a study design that captures the nuances of the problem; gather empirical data bearing on the social problem that enable the design to be operationalized by forming identifiable and repeatable measures; model the multilevel data using appropriate multilevel statistical methods to uncover potential causes and any bias to their effects; and use the results to sharpen theory and to formulate evidence-based policy recommendations for implementation and testing. Applying this process, the core chapters present multilevel models focusing on political extremism, global human development, violence against minorities, the substantive complexity of work, reform of urban schools, and problems of health care. The reader will be better able to conduct state-of-the-art studies on these and other topics by gaining an understanding of these chapters and by using the available data sets and analytic programs to replicate and advance the analyses.

Keywords

Propensity Score Test Factor Dependency Network Causality Argument Palestinian Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Campbell, Donald T., and Julian C. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  2. Cochran, William G. 1968. The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics (June): 205–313.Google Scholar
  3. Cox, D.R., and Nanny Wermuth. 2001. Some statistical aspects of causality. European Sociological Review 17: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, D.R., and Nanny Wermuth. 2004. Causality: A statistical view. International Statistical Review 72: 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glock, Charles, and Rodney Stark. 1966. Christian beliefs and antisemitism. New York: Harper & Row Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goldthorpe, John H. 1998. Causation, statistics and sociology. Dublin, Ireland: The Economic and Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Wagner Thielens Jr. 1958. The academic mind. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Maas, C.J.M., and T.A.B. Snijders. 2003. The multi-level approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data. Quality & Quantity 37: 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan, Stephen L., and Christopher Winship. 2007. Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Pearl, Judea. [2000] 2009. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rubin, Donald B. [1984] 2006. William G. Cochran’s contributions to the design, analysis, and evaluation of observational studies. In Matched sampling for causal effects, ed. Donald B. Rubin, 7–29. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  14. Singer, Judith D., and John B. Willett. 2003. Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stouffer, Samuel A. 1955. Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  16. Stouffer, Samuel A. 1992. Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind (with a new introduction by James A. Davis). New Brunswick: TransactionGoogle Scholar
  17. Sudman, Seymour. 1976. Applied sampling. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Structural Research Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations