Organizing innovations and transitions

Toward a more sustainable fit between innovation strategies and the institutional environment
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on the interaction between developmental dynamics in the different action experiments, aimed at exploring new more sustainable agricultural business models, and changes in the wider institutional environment. Which (mis)fits can be identified? What has to be done to enable agro innovation to more effectively be managed in a rapidly globalizing and urbanizing environment? Based on a loose theoretical framework, consisting of notions of the network society, transition theory and urban regime theory, we come to the conclusion that we need a new conceptual/strategic story line, with the developmental coalitions related, enabling a productive fit between a ‘transitionalizing’ landscape of agriculture on one side and a highly urbanizing metropolitan environment on the other.

Keywords

Action Experiment Innovation Process Business Case Organize Innovation Consumer Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, K., Eklund, E., Lehtola, M., & Salmi, P. (2009). Beyond the rural-urban divide. Cross-continental perspectives on the differentiated countryside and its regulation. Research in rural sociology and development, vol. 14. Bingley, UK: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, W. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Boelens, L. (Ed.) (2000). Nederland Netwerkenland, een inventarisatie van de nieuwe condities van planologie en stedebouw. Rotterdam: Nai Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  4. Braaksma, P.J., & Bos, A.E. (Eds.) (2007). Investeren in het Nederlandse landschap. Opbrengst: geluk en euro’s. Den Haag: Ministerie van LNV.Google Scholar
  5. Bunte, F., Bolhuis, J., Bont, J.C. de, Jukema, G., & Kuiper, E. (2009). Prijsvorming van voed ingproducten. Nota 09-074. Wageningen: LEI.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. The information age: economy, society and culture, vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Geels, F., Schot, J., & Verbong, G. (2004). A multi-level analysis of historical transitions in agriculture and food. Position paper for Bsik programme. Zoetermeer: TransForum Agro & Groen.Google Scholar
  9. Geels, F., Elzen, B., Berkers, E., Leeuwis, C., & Mierlo, B. van (2008). Historische en hedendaagse systeem-innovaties in de glastuinbouw en varkenshouderij. Een innovatie sociologische analyse. Zoetermeer: TransForum Agro & Groen.Google Scholar
  10. Geels, F.W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Haarmann, W., Horlings, I., & Derix, G. (2009). Please in my backyard. Parc Hoogveld en de opkomst van de Integrated Care Community. TransForum Working Paper 10. Zoetermeer: TransForum Agro & Groen.Google Scholar
  13. Hassink, J., Zwartbol, Ch., Agricola, H., Elings, M., & Thissen, J.T.N.M. (2007). Current status and potential of care farms in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal for Agrarian Sociology, 55 (1).Google Scholar
  14. Horlings, I. (Ed.) (2010). Vital coalitions, vital regions. Partnerships for sustainable regional development. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for sustainable transport: The approach of strategic niche management. London and New York: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krasner, S.D. (Ed.) (1983). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, M.N.C. (2008). Conflict, communication and space for change in complex problem situations. Paper presented at the 2008 conference of the International Association of Conflict Management (IACM), Chicago, July 3–6, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable develop ment. Dissertation. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  20. Lörzing, H. (2007). Landschap, ons themapark. In: Derksen, W. (Ed.), Kijkend naar Nederland (pp. 43–49). Rotterdam/Den Haag: Nai Uitgevers/Ruimtelijk Planbureau.Google Scholar
  21. Marsden, T. (1998). New rural territories: Regulating the differentiated rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies, 14, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mommaas, H. (2003). Op zoek naar Arcadie. Over de sociaal-culturele dimensie van de groene ruimte. In: Beun, N.J., Hulshof, C.W.M., & Hillebrand, J.H.A. (Eds.), Sociaal-culturele aspecten van groene ruimte en voeding (pp. 47–81). Rapport nr. 03.2.034. Den Haag: Innovatienetwerk Groene Ruimte en Agrocluster.Google Scholar
  23. Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory. The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs, 36, 810–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (2009). Prijsvorming in de agri-food sector. Den Haag: NMA.Google Scholar
  25. Nooteboom, B., & Stam, E. (2008). Micro-foundations for innovation policy. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ploeg, J.D. van der, Verschuren, P., Verhoeven, F., & Peppels, J. (2006). Dealing with novelties, a grassland experiment reconsidered. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 8(3), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poppe, K.J., Termeer, C. & Slingerland, M. (Eds.) (2009). Transitions towards sustainable agri culture and food chains in peri-urban areas. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Porter, M.E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6&7), 549–578.Google Scholar
  29. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  30. Ruggie, J.G. (1975). International responses to technology – concepts and trends. International Organization, 29(3), 557–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schot, J., & Geels, F.W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smeets, P. (2009). Expeditie Agroparken. Dissertation. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.Google Scholar
  33. Stoep, H. van der & Aarts, M.N.C. (2010). New markets in Heuvelland: coalition building and agenda setting. In: Horlings, I. (Ed.), Vital coalitions, vital regions. Partnerships for sustain able, regional development (pp. 121–150). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  35. Stone, C. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stoker, G., & Mossberger, K. (1994). Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environ ment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UN (2006). World Population Prospects. The 2004 Revision. Volume III: Analytical Report. New York: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
  38. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (2005). Netherlands agricultural situation, the Benelux hor ticulture market. GAIN Report Number NL5002. Retrieved 2010-06-07.Google Scholar
  39. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR) (1998). Ruimtelijke Ontwikkelingspolitiek. Rapporten aan de Regering. Den Haag: SDU Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  40. Veldkamp, A., Van Altvorst, A.C., Eweg, R., Jacobsen, E., Van Kleef, A., Van Latesteijn, H., Mager, S., Mommaas, H., Smeets, P.J.A.M., Spaans, L., & Van Trijp, H. (2008). Triggering transitions towards sustainable development of the Dutch agricultural sector: TransForum’s approach. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TransForum and TelosTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.TransForumZoetermeerThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations