From Traditional Maggot Therapy to Modern Biosurgery

Chapter
Part of the Biologically-Inspired Systems book series (BISY, volume 2)

Abstract

The definition of insect biotechnology provided in this book refers to any technological application that uses insects or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use in agriculture, food science, and medicine. The most prominent application of insects or insect-derived molecules in medicine is known as maggot therapy or biosurgery. The term maggot therapy has been established for the application of live larvae from the green blow fly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) to cure open, infected, chronic and/or necrotic wounds, particularly those associated with diabetic or vascular ulcers, whose cure by conventional approaches often fails. This simple and highly successful therapy has received renewed attention in wound therapy because it combines a number of advantages such as efficacy, excellent safety record, and low costs. However, the maggots are sometimes negatively perceived by patients and their sharp mouth-hooks and spicules can sometimes cause pain. Recent research focuses on the identification of molecules from L. sericata mediating promotion of wound healing as well as debridement and disinfection of wounds. The production and application of corresponding synthetic or recombinant analogues may expand the use of insect-derived molecules beyond maggot therapy of wounds to include the cure of other diseases by biosurgery.

Keywords

Maggot therapy Biosurgery Wound healing Antimicrobials Lucilia sericata 

References

  1. Altincicek B, Vilcinskas A (2007a) Identification of immune-related genes from an apterygote insect, the firebrat Thermobia domestica. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 37(3):726–731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altincicek B, Vilcinskas A (2007b) Analysis of the immune-inducible transcriptome from microbial stress resistant, rat-tailed maggots of the drone fly Eristalis tenax. BMC Genomics 8:326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Altincicek B, Vilcinskas A (2009) Septic injury-inducible genes in medicinal maggots of the green blow fly Lucilia sericata. Insect Mol Biol 18(1):119–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beasley WD, Hirst G (2004) Making a meal of MRSA-the role of biosurgery in hospital-acquired infection. J Hosp Infect 56:6–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bexfield A, Nigam Y, Thomas S, Ratcliffe NA (2004) Detection and partial characterisation of two antibacterial factors from the excretion/secretions of the medicinal maggot Lucilia sericata and their activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Microb Infect 6(14):1297–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerovsky V, Zdarek J, Fucik V, Monincova L, Voburka Z, Bem R (2010) Lucifensin, the long-sought antimicrobial factor of medicinal maggots of the blowfly Lucilia sericata. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:455–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers L, Woodrow S, Brown AP (2003) Degradation of extracellular matrix components by defined proteinases from the greenbottle larva Lucilia sericata used for the clinical debridement of non-healing wounds. Br J Dermatol 148:14–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Church JC (1996) The traditional use of maggots in wound healing, and the development of larva therapy (biosurgery) in modern medicine. J Altern Complement Med 2:525–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Horobin AJ, Shakesheff KM, Woodrow S, Robinson C, Pritchard DI (2003) Maggots and wound healing: an investigation of the effects of secretions from Lucilia sericata larvae upon interactions between human dermal fibroblasts and extracellular matrix components. Br J Dermatol 148:923–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Huberman L, Gollop N, Mumcuoglu KY, Breuer E, Bhusare SR, Shai Y, Galun R (2007) Antibacterial substances of low molecular weight isolated from the blowfly, Lucilia sericata. Med Vet Entomol 21:127–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mumcuoglu KY, Ingber A, Gilead J, Stessman J, Friedman R, Schulman H (1999) Maggot therapy for the treatment of intractable wounds. Int J Dermatol 38:623–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rawlings ND, Morton FR (2008) The MEROPS batch BLAST: a tool to detect peptidases and their non-peptidase homologues in a genome. Biochimie 90(2):243–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sherman RA, Wyle F, Vulpe M (1995) Effects of seven antibiotics on the growth and development of Phaenicia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae. J Med Entomol 32(5):646–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sherman RA, Hall MJ, Thomas S (2000) Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions. Annu Rev Entomol 45:55–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas S, Jones M, Shutler S, Jones S (1996) Using larvae in modern wound management. J Wound Care 5:60–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. van der Plas MJK, van der Does AM, Baldry M, Dogterom-Ballering HC, van Gulpen C et al. (2007) Maggot excretions/secretions inhibit multiple neutrophil pro-inflammatory response. Microbes Infect 9:507–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. van der Plas MJA, Jukema GN, Wai SW, Dogterom-Ballering HCM, Lagendijk EL, van Gulpen C, van Dissel JT, Bloemberg GV, Nibbering PH (2008) Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:117–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. van der Plas MJA, Baldry M, van Dissel JT, Jukema GN, Nibbering PH (2009a) Maggot secretions suppress pro-inflammatory response of human monocytes through elevation of cyclic AMP. Diabetologia 52:1962–1970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. van der Plas MJA, van Dissel JT, Nibbering PH (2009b) Maggot secretions skew monocyte-macrophage differentiation away from a pro-inflammatory to a pro-angiogenic type. PLoS One 4(11):e8071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vilcinskas A, Götz P (1999) Parasitic fungi and their interactions with the insect immune system. Adv Parasitol 43:267–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zumpt F (1965) Myiasis in man and animals in the Old World. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Giessen, Institute of Phytopathology and Applied ZoologyGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Bio-ResourcesFraunhofer Institute of Molecular Biology and Applied EcologyGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations