Advertisement

Emergency and Post-emergency Management of the Abruzzi Earthquake

  • Mauro Dolce
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 17)

Abstract

The activities initiated after the Mw 6.3 Abruzzi Earthquake of April 6, 2010 can be distinguished in three phases: emergency, post-emergency and reconstruction. Although they are not exactly sequential, because of some overlapping between them, it is useful to use such a scheme, also in relation to the objective to be reached at the end of each of them. The management of the emergency and post-emergency phases was relied upon a governmental commissioner, that, until January 31, 2010, was the chief of the Civil Protection Department. From February 1, 2010, a new commissioner was enforced, with the full responsibility of the reconstruction phase. In this paper the main problems and solutions dealt with in the three phases are described, with a main concern for engineering aspects.

Keywords

Peak Ground Acceleration Emergency Management Masonry Building Epicentral Area Civil Protection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akinci A, Galadini F, Pantosti D, Petersen M, Malagnini L, Perkins D (2009) Effect of time dependence on probabilistic seismic-hazard maps and deaggregation for the central apennines. Bull Seism Soc Am, Italy 99(2A):585–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boncio P, Tinari DP, Lavecchia G, Visini F, Milana G (2009) The instrumental seismicity of the Abruzzo region in Central Italy (1981–2003): seismotectonic implications. Ital J Geosci (Boll Soc Geol It) 128(2):367–380Google Scholar
  3. Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: a statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 scale. Publication CNR-PFG n.503, 1982, RomaGoogle Scholar
  4. Calvi GM, Spaziante V (2009) La ricostruzione tra provvisorio e definitivo: il Progetto C.A.S.E. Progettazione Sismica, n.3, PaviaGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiarabba C, Amato A, Anselmi M, Baccheschi P, Bianchi I, Cattaneo M et al (2009) The 2009 L’Aquila (central Italy) MW6.3 earthquake: main shock and aftershocks. Geophys Res Lett 36:L18308. doi:10.1029/2009GL039627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CPTI Working Group (2004) Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani, versione 2004 (CPTI04). INGV, Bologna. http://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI/
  7. DISS Working Group (2009) Database of individual seismogenic sources (DISS), Version 3.1.0: a compilation of potential sources for earthquakes larger than M 5.5 in Italy and surrounding areas. http://diss.rm.ingv.it/diss/, © INGV 2009 – Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – All rights reserved
  8. Decreto Legge 28 aprile 2009, n.39 (2009) Interventi urgenti in favore delle popolazioni colpite dagli eventi sismici della Regione Abruzzo nel mese di aprile 2009 e ulteriori interventi urgenti di protezione civile, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. De Sortis A, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Gregolo S, Papa S, Rettore GF (2009) Linee guida per la riduzione della vulnerabilità di elementi non strutturali, arredi e impianti. http://www.protezionecivile.it, http://www.reluis.it
  10. Di Ludovico M, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Manfredi G, Moroni C, Prota A (2009) Seismic behaviour of schools after the earthquake of L’Aquila. Progettazione Sismica, n.3, PaviaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolce M (2008) Civil protection vs earthquake engineering and seismological research. In: Proceeding of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, Keynote speech, October 2008Google Scholar
  12. Dolce M, Di Pasquale G, Albanese V, Benetti D, Bramerini F, Coppari S et al (2009) Quick surveys: post-earthquake usability inspections. Progettazione Sismica, Pavia, n.3Google Scholar
  13. Dolce M, Giovinazzi S, Iervolino I, Nigro E, Tang A (2009) Emergency management for lifelines and rapid response after L’Aquila earthquake. Progettazione Sismica, Pavia, n.3Google Scholar
  14. Dolce M, Naso G (2009) The seismic microzonation for the reconstruction in L’Aquila territory: preliminary results. Progettazione Sismica, Pavia, n.3Google Scholar
  15. DPC-ReLUIS (2009) Linee guida per la riparazione e il rafforzamento di elementi strutturali, tamponature e partizioni, http://www.protezionecivile.it, http://www.reluis.it
  16. DPC-ReLUIS, Soprintendenza BAAS dell’Abruzzo, Struttura Tecnica di Missione (2010a) Linee guida per il rilievo, l’analisi ed il progetto di interventi di riparazione e rafforzamento/miglioramento di edifici in aggregato, http://www.protezionecivile.it, http://www.reluis.it
  17. DPC-ReLUIS, Struttura Tecnica di missione, ALIG, ALGI (2010b) Modalità di indagine sulle strutture e sui terreni per i progetti di riparazione/miglioramento/ricostruzione di edifici inagibili, http://www.protezionecivile.it, http://www.reluis.it
  18. EMERGEO Working Group (2009) Rilievi geologici nell’area epicentrale della sequenza sismica dell’Aquilano del 6 aprile 2009. Quaderni di Geofisica 70, ISSN 1590-2595Google Scholar
  19. Galadini F, Galli P (2003) Paleoseismology of silent faults in the Central Apennines (Italy): the Mt. Vettore and Laga Mts. Faults. Ann Geophys 46(5):815–836Google Scholar
  20. http://www.protezionecivile.it/cms/view.php?dir_pk=395&cms_pk=14798 (2008) Pianificazione dell’emergenza e scenari di danno, Rome
  21. Legge 24 giugno 2009, n.77 (2009) Conversione del D.L. 28 aprile 2009, n.39, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministero delle Infrastrutture, DM 14.01.08 (2008) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. Naeim F, Kelly JM (1999) Design of seismic isolated structures. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pace B, Peruzza L, Lavecchia G, Boncio P (2006) Layered seismogenic source model and probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses in central Italy. Bull Seism Soc Am 96(1):107–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. QUEST Group (2009) Rapporto sugli effetti del terremoto aquilano del 6 aprile 2009. http://portale.ingv.it/real-time-monitoring/quest/aquilano-06-04-2009/
  26. Vezzani L, Ghisetti F (1998) Carta Geologica dell’Abruzzo, 1:100,000 scale. S.E.L.CA. edn, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  27. Working Group MS (2008) Guidelines for seismic microzonation. Civil Protection Department, Rome (in Italian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Italian Department of Civil ProtectionSeismic Risk OfficeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations