Advertisement

Current Trends in the Seismic Design and Assessment of Buildings

  • Andreas J. Kappos
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 17)

Abstract

Current trends in the seismic design and assessment of buildings are discussed, with emphasis on two procedures that merit some particular attention, displacement-based procedures and deformation-based procedures. A number of selected case-studies are summarised, involving reinforced concrete (R/C) buildings designed to the aforementioned procedures. Then, an overview of the currently available procedures for seismic assessment is presented and the different designs are assessed using state-of-the-art methods involving inelastic analysis of the static and/or dynamic type; alternative designs are compared in terms of economy and seismic performance, and some general conclusions are drawn regarding the feasibility of introducing the new procedures in seismic codes.

Keywords

Plastic Hinge Pushover Analysis Target Displacement SDOF System Interstorey Drift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

A number of the author’s students have made significant contributions to some of the studies summarised herein. The contributions of S. Stefanidou, S. Papista, and G. Panagopoulos, graduate students at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, and A. Manafpour, former graduate student at Imperial College, London, are particularly acknowledged.

References

  1. Ambraseys N, Smit P, Berardi R, Rinaldis D, Cotton F, Berge C (2000) Dissemination of European strong-motion data. CD-ROM collection. European Commission, DGXII, Science, Research and Development, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers (2006) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-05, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  3. ASCE/SEI (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings – ASCE standard 41-06. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  4. Athanassiadou CJ, Kappos AJ, Ziakos K (2003) Seismic performance of multistorey r/c buildings designed to the new Eurocode 8 (prEN-1998-1). fib 2003 Symposium: Concrete structures in seismic regions (Athens), CD Proceedings, paper no. 018Google Scholar
  5. Biggs JM (1964) Structural dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr A (2004) RUAUMOKO, manuals, “vol. 1 theory and user guide to associated programs, vol. 3 user manual for the 3-dimensional version”. University of Canterbury, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  7. CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings (EN 1998-1: 2004). CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. CEN (2005a) Eurocode 8: Design provisions of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 2: Bridges (EN1998-2:2005). CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. CEN (2005b) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings (EN 1998-3:2005). CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  10. Chopra AK, Goel RK (2001) Direct displacement-based design: Use of inelastic vs. elastic design spectra. Earthquake Spectra 17(1):47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Computers and Structures Inc. (2005) ETABS nonlinear v.9.1.4 “extended 3D analysis of building systems”. Program Manuals, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Dymiotis C, Kappos AJ, Chryssanthopoulos MC (1999) Seismic reliability of R/C frames with uncertain drift and member capacity. J Struct Eng ASCE 125(9):1038–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 28(9):979–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. fib Task Group 7.2 (2003) Displacement-based seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings. fib Bull. 25, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  15. International Conference of Building Officials (1997) Uniform building code – 1997 edition, vol 2. Structural Engineering Design Provisions, Whittier, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. International Conference of Building Officials (2009) International Building Code/Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Country Club Hills, IL; Whittier, CA; and Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc., Birmingham, ALGoogle Scholar
  17. Kappos AJ (1997a) Seismic damage indices for R/C buildings: Evaluation of concepts and procedures. Prog Struct Eng Mater 1(1):78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kappos AJ (1997b) Partial inelastic analysis procedure for optimum capacity design of buildings. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes (Bled, Slovenia, June 1997), Balkema, pp 229–240Google Scholar
  19. Kappos AJ (2000) Feasibility of using advanced analytical tools in the seismic design of R/C structures. In: Proceedings of the G. Penelis international symposium on concrete and masonry structures, Ziti editions, Thessaloniki, pp 47–60Google Scholar
  20. Kappos AJ (2009) Design of earthquake resistant buildings. In: Invited lecture, international conference on earthquake engineering, Banja Luka, 26–28 October 2009, pp 147–184Google Scholar
  21. Kappos AJ, Goutzika E, Stefanidou S (2007) An improved performance-based seismic design method for 3D R/C buildings using inelastic dynamic analysis. In: Conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering (COMPDYN), Rethymno, Greece, June, paper no. 1375Google Scholar
  22. Kappos AJ, Manafpour A (2001) Seismic design of R/C buildings with the aid of advanced analytical techniques. Eng Struct 23(4):319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G (2004) Performance-based seismic design of 3D R/C buildings using inelastic static and dynamic analysis procedures. ISET J Earthquake Technol 41(1):141–158Google Scholar
  24. Kappos AJ, Stefanidou S (2010) A deformation-based seismic design method for 3D R/C irregular buildings using inelastic dynamic analysis. Bull Earthquake Eng 8(4):875–895Google Scholar
  25. Moehle JP (1992) Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 8(3):403–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN (2001) A displacement-based seismic design procedure for R/C buildings and comparison with EC8. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 30:1439–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paulay T (2002) A displacement-focused seismic design of mixed building systems. Earthquake Spectra 18(4):689–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penelis GG, Kappos AJ (1997) Earthquake-resistant concrete structures. E&FN SPON, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Priestley MJN (1993) Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering—Conflicts between design and reality. In: Proceedings of the Tom Paulay symposium—Recent developments in lateral force transfer in buildings, ACI SP-157, pp 229–252Google Scholar
  30. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, PaviaGoogle Scholar
  31. Priestley MJN, Kowalsky MJ (2000) Direct displacement-based design of concrete buildings. Bull N Z Natl Soc Earthquake Eng 33(4):421–444Google Scholar
  32. SEAOC Ad Hoc Committee (1999) Tentative guidelines for performance-based seismic engineering. App. I of: Recommended lateral force requirements and Commentary, SEAOC, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  33. Shibata A, Sozen M (1976) Substitute structure method for seismic design in reinforced concrete. J Str Div ASCE 102(1):1–18Google Scholar
  34. Sullivan TJ, Calvi GM, Priestley MJN, Kowalski MJ (2003) The limitations and performances of different displacement based design methods. J Earthquake Eng 7(1):201–244Google Scholar
  35. Sullivan TJ, Priestley MJN, Calvi GM (2006) Direct displacement-based design of frame-wall structures. J Earthquake Eng 10(1):91–124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Concrete and Masonry Structures, Department of Civil EngineeringAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations