The Scientific Challenge

Chapter

Abstract

In the last chapter, I described how a number of argument forms that had traditionally been characterized by philosophers as weak or fallacious modes of reasoning could be shown to facilitate scientific inquiry into BSE when little was known about this new brain disease in cattle. The point was made that these argument forms have relevance to the epidemiologists and public health scientists whose task it was to identify and respond to this emerging infectious disease. However, this point requires some explanatory work if it is to have more than a very general application to the work of these public health professionals. For these professionals might ask with some justification why they should treat seriously argument forms that have been deemed to be logically inadequate by generations of philosophers. They might also wonder if philosophical discussion of reasoning has anything but the most abstract lessons for scientists who are charged with containing infectious diseases. In this chapter, I undertake this explanatory work by arguing that philosophical contributions on reasoning and argument are not only relevant to epidemiology, but that they also represent the very best prospect for investigators of addressing some of the criticisms of epidemiology that have been raised in recent years. These criticisms have been expressed most clearly by Christakos et al. (2005), although other theorists have also added their voices to the exchange.

Keywords

Prion Disease Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Molecular Similarity Bone Meal Scrapie Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Phillips CV (2008) Commentary: lack of scientific influences on epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 37 (1):59–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hope J, Reekie LJ, Hunter N, Multhaup G, Beyreuther K, White H, Scott AC, Stack MJ, Dawson M, Wells GA (1988) Fibrils from brains of cows with new cattle disease contain scrapie-associated protein. Nature 336 (6197):390–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Krieger N (2003) Place, space, and health: GIS and epidemiology. Epidemiology 14 (4):384–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansen HV, Pinto RC (eds) (1995) Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PAGoogle Scholar
  5. Taubes G (1995) Epidemiology faces its limits. Science 269 (5221):164–165 and 167–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Govier T (1987) Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Foris , DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Wells GAH, Scott AC, Johnson CT, Gunning RF, Hancock RD, Jeffrey M, Dawson M, Bradley R (1987) A novel progressive spongiform encephalopathy in cattle. Vet Rec 121 (18):419–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahane H (1980) The nature and classification of fallacies. In: Blair JA, Johnson RH (eds) Informal logic: The first international symposium. Edgepress, Inverness, CAGoogle Scholar
  9. Adams P, Hurd MD, McFadden D, Merrill A, Ribeiro T (2003) Healthy, wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socioeconomic status. J Econometrics 112 (1):3–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holmes EE (1997) Basic epidemiological concepts in a spatial context. In: Tilman D, Kareiva PM (eds) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Krieger N (2001) A glossary for social epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 55 (10):693–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaplan GA (2004) What’s wrong with social epidemiology, and how can we make it better? Epidemiol Rev 26 (1):124–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabbay DM, Woods J (to appear) Seductions and shortcuts: fallacies in the cognitive economy. Elsevier, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  14. Baron H, Baron-Van Evercooren A, Brucher JM (1988) Antiserum to scrapie-associated fibril protein reacts with amyloid plaques in familial transmissible dementia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 47 (2):158–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Biro JI (1977) Rescuing ‘begging the question’. Metaphilosophy 8 (4):257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bendheim PE, Bockman JM, McKinley MP, Kingsbury DT, Prusiner SB (1985) Scrapie and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prion proteins share physical properties and antigenic determinants. Pro Natl Acad Sci 82 (4):997–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummings L (2004b) Argument as cognition: a Putnamian criticism of Dale Hample's cognitive conception of argument. Argumentation 18 (3):331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeffrey M, Wells GAH (1988) Spongiform encephalopathy in a Nyala (Tragelaphus angasi). Vet Pathol 25 (5):398–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paneth N (2003) A conversation with Mervyn Susser. Epidemiology 14 (6):748–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Phillips CV, Goodman KJ, Poole C et al (2004) Lead editorial: The need for greater perspective and innovation in epidemiology. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 1 (1):1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimberlin RH, Walker CA, Millson GC, Taylor DM, Robertson PA, Tomlinson AH, Dickinson AG (1983) Disinfection studies with two strains of mouse-passaged scrapie agent. Guidelines for Creutzfeldt-Jakob and related agents. J Neurol Sci 59 (3):355–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Savitz DA, Poole C, Miller WC (1999) Reassessing the role of epidemiology in public health. Am J Public Health 89 (8):1158–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bruce ME, Will RG, Ironside JW, McConnell I, Drummond D, Suttie A, McCardle L, Chree A, Hope J, Birkett C, Cousens S, Fraser H, Bostock CJ (1997) Transmissions to mice indicate that ‘new variant’ CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature 389 (6650):498–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merz PA, Somerville RA, Wisniewski HM, Iqbal K (1981) Abnormal fibrils from scrapie-infected brain. Acta Neuropathol 54 (1):63–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woods J (2004) The death of argument: fallacies in agent-based reasoning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  26. Weed DL (1995) Epidemiology, the humanities, and public health. Am J Public Health 85 (7):914–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hample D (1982) Dual coding, reasoning and fallacies. J Am Forensic Assoc 19 (2):59–78Google Scholar
  28. Christakos G, Olea RA, Serre ML, Yu H-L, Wang L-L (2005) Interdisciplinary public health reasoning and epidemic modelling: the case of black death, Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  29. Walton DN (1993) Alethic, epistemic, and dialectical modes of argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (4):302–310Google Scholar
  30. Lingappa JR, McDonald LC, Simone P, Parashar UD (2004) Wresting SARS from uncertainty. Emerg Infect Dis 10 (2):167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsh RF, Hanson RP (1979) On the origin of transmissible mink encephalopathy. In: Prusiner SB, Hadlow WJ (eds) Slow transmissible diseases of the nervous system. Volume 1: clinical, epidemiological, genetic, and pathological aspects of the spongiform encephalopathies. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Rohwer RG (1984) Scrapie infectious agent is virus-like in size and susceptibility to inactivation. Nature 308 (5960):658–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kitamoto T, Tateishi J, Tashima T, Takeshita I, Barry RA, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB (1986) Amyloid plaques in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease stain with prion protein antibodies. Ann Neurol 20 (2):204–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Brown P, Rohwer RG, Green EM, Gajdusek DC (1982) Effect of chemicals, heat, and histopathologic processing on high-infectivity hamster-adapted scrapie virus. J Infect Dis 145 (5):683–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Brown P, Cathala F, Raubertas RF, Gajdusek DC, Castaigne P (1987) The epidemiology of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: conclusion of a 15-year investigation in France and review of the world literature. Neurology 37 (6):895–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith DJ (2006) Predictability and preparedness in influenza control. Science 312 (5772):392–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothman KJ (2002) Epidemiology: an Introduction. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Lipsitch M, Riley S, Cauchemez S, Ghani AC, Ferguson NM (2009) Managing and reducing uncertainty in an emerging influenza pandemic. N Eng J Med 361 (2):112–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MAFF/ADAS (1986) Animal Health 1986: Report of the chief veterinary officer. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Hartsough GR, Burger D (1965) Encephalopathy of mink. I. Epizootiologic and clinical observations. J Infect Dis 115 (4):387–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilesmith JW, Wells GA, Cranwell MP, Ryan JB (1988) Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: epidemiological studies. Vet Rec 123 (25):638–644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bockman JM, Kingsbury DT, McKinley MP, Bendheim PE, Prusiner SB (1985) Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prion proteins in human brains. N Engl J Med 312 (2):73–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rescher N (1976) Plausible reasoning: an introduction to the theory and practice of plausibilistic inference. Van Gorcum, Assen/AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. Bode L, Pocchiari M, Gelderblom H, Diringer H (1985) Characterization of antisera against scrapie-associated fibrils (SAF) from affected hamster and cross-reactivity with SAF from scrapie-affected mice and from patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J Gen Virol 66 (11):2471–2478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hample D (1985) A third perspective on argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric 18 (1):1–22Google Scholar
  46. Hample D (1988) Argument: public and private, social and cognitive. J Am Forensic Assoc 25 (1):13–19Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts and HumanitiesNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations