A Global Earthquake Building Damage and Casualty Database

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 29)

Abstract

This chapter presents a preliminary overview of the Cambridge University Earthquake Damage Database (CUEDD) now the Cambridge Earthquake Impact Database (CEQID) with emphasis on its human casualty component. CUEDD is based on earthquake damage data assembled by the Martin Centre at Cambridge University since 1980, complemented by other more-recently published and some unpublished data. The database through its organised, expandable and web-accessible format, summarizes information on worldwide post-earthquake building damage surveys which have been carried out since the 1960s (www.ceqid.org). Currently it contains data on the performance of more than 1.3 million individual buildings, in 600 surveys following 50 separate earthquakes. The database provides total recorded casualties (deaths, seriously and moderately injured), and casualty rates as a proportion of population with definitions of injury levels used, and information on dominant types of injury, age groups affected, etc. It also provides geographically disaggregated data where possible, and associates them with tables and GIS maps. Sources of information on other aspects of human casualty information (epidemiological studies, health care impacts, etc.) are provided. Analytical tools enable relationships between casualty rates, building classes and ground motion parameters to be determined.

Keywords

Ground Motion Damage Level Vulnerability Curve Damage Ratio Modify Mercalli Intensity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

CUEDD has been developed by Cambridge Architectural Research Ltd. The project team has included Robin Spence, Antonios Pomonis, Emily So, Keiko Saito, Victoria Lee, Hermione Tuck, Aiko Furukawa, Janet Owers and Susanna Jenkins. CAR has worked in collaboration with the PAGER team at US Geological Survey, Golden Colorado, David Wald and Kishor Jaiswal. The database and website design were by Simon Ruffle and Vicky Smith of Stride Design. Financial support for the development of CUEDD has been provided by the Coburn Foundation. Several damage surveys have been sourced from the personal archive of Andrew Coburn; other contributions have come from Antonios Pomonis, the EU Centre, Pavia, and Jim Cousins of GNS, New Zealand.

References

  1. Bulut M, Fedakar R, Akkose S, Akgoz S, Ozguc H, Tokyay T (2005) Medical experience of a university hospital in Turkey after the 1999 Marmara earthquake. Emerg Med J 22:494–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Erdik M (2001) Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) earthquakes. In: Casciati F, Magonette G (eds) Structural control for civil and infrastructure engineering. World Scitific, Istanbul, pp 149–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mulvey JM, Awan SU, Qadri AA, Maqsood MA (2008) Profile of injuries arising from the 2005 Kashmir earthquake: The first 72h. Inj Int J Care Inj 39:554–560Google Scholar
  4. NIBS and FEMA (National Institute of Building Sciences and Federal Emergency Management Agency), (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS®MH technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Petal MA (2004) Urban disaster mitigation and preparedness: the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. Dissertation University of California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Sheng ZY (1987) Medical support in the Tangshan earthquake: a review of the management of mass casualties and certain major injuries. J Trauma 27(10):1130–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. So E, Spence R (2009) Estimating shaking-induced casualties and building damage for global earthquake events. Final Technical Report, NEHRP Grant number 08HQGR0102Google Scholar
  8. Spence RJS, So E, Jenny S, Castella H, Ewald M, Booth E (2008) The Global Earthquake Vulnerability Estimation System (GEVES): an approach for earthquake risk assessment for insurance applications. Bull Earthquake Eng 6(3):463–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Spence
    • 1
  • E. So
    • 1
  • S. Jenkins
    • 1
  • A. Coburn
    • 2
  • S. Ruffle
    • 3
  1. 1.Cambridge Architectural Research LtdCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Risk Management Solutions, Inc., Peninsular HouseLondonUK
  3. 3.Stride Design LtdCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations