Catchment Management Agencies: A Case Study of Institutional Reform in South Africa

  • Eiman Karar
  • Gugu Mazibuko
  • Thomas Gyedu-Ababio
  • Derek Weston
Chapter
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter highlights the decentralisation of water resources management to a local level through the establishment of Catchment Management Agencies (CMA). The first 8 of 19 proposed CMAs have been established and a number of institutional challenges have been identified. Stakeholder participation in the establishment of CMAs has been largely successful, but the process of establishment has been too slow and further delayed by a review of the number of CMAs to be established. The Inkomati experience shows that a lack of coherent support from DWAF and building the credibility of the institution in the water management area have been major challenges. The fact that DWAF is the driver and initiator of CMA establishment placed huge strain on the already-limited human capacity that had to perform these tasks in addition to daily water resource management activities.

Although the decentralisation-based reforms for water management define a critical role for communities and users at large, the state must, and will continue to, play a fundamental role because of its responsibility for managing water as a public good and for ensuring redress, equitable allocation of water and equitable representation in decision-making. As a water-scarce country, the need to safeguard the sustainable provision of ecosystem goods and services and to protect the interests and welfare of all users, especially the poor, women and the disabled becomes critical.

Keywords

Decentralisation Governance Public participation Catchment management agencies Institutional change Capacity building 

References

  1. Asmal K (1998) Water as a metaphor for governance: issues in the management of water resources in Africa. Water Policy 1:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Coning C, Sherwill T (2004) An assessment of the water policy process in South Africa (1994 to 2003). Water research Commission Report TT232/04. Water Research Commission, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  3. DWAF (2005) The national water resource strategy for South Africa. Department of Water Affairs & Forestry, 2005. Government Printer, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  4. Molden D (2007) Water for food, water for life. Comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. IWMI, Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
  5. RSA (1997) White paper on a national water policy for South Africa. Government Printer, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  6. RSA (1998) National Water Act. Government Gazette Vol.398. 26 August 1998. Office of the President, Cape TownGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eiman Karar
    • 1
  • Gugu Mazibuko
    • 2
  • Thomas Gyedu-Ababio
    • 3
  • Derek Weston
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Research CommissionPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Pegasys Strategy and DevelopmentPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.South African National ParksPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations