Visual Law: The Changing Signifiers of Law in Popular Visual Culture

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter uses Saussurean semiotics to explore how law is culturally defined through popular visual media and how these media representations contribute to wider understandings of both law’s functioning and its limitations. It profiles four signifiers of law in popular visual media: the father, the lawyer, the policeman and the vigilante and explores the relationship between them, analysing the impact each of these signifiers has on the corresponding signified of law and their connections to justice and the rule of law. The primary texts I will be looking at are the US television series Law & Order (NBC) and Dexter (Showtime) and the UK series Life on Mars (BBC). Following Bennett and Woollacott’s study (1987, Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero. London: Methuen) these examples are supported by a deliberately wide-ranging series of secondary media texts, with some slippage between filmic and televisual texts, as any other approach runs the risk of being too limiting, abstracting texts from the wider culture which both elucidates their meaning and demonstrates how widespread these ideas of law truly are.

Keywords

Crime Control Defence Lawyer Serial Killer Television Series Police Procedural 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1998 [1995]. Homo Sace: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, Maxine P. and Blackwelder, Stephen P. 1993. Fathering in the 20th Century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 975–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auerback, Jerold S. 1983. Justice Without Law? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bainbridge, Jason. 2006. Lawyers, Justice and the State: The Sliding Signifier of Law in Popular Culture. Griffith Law Review, 15(1), 153–176.Google Scholar
  5. Bainbridge, Jason. 2007. ‘This Is The Authority. This Planet Is Under Our Protection’ An Exegesis of Superheroes’ Interrogations of Law. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 3, 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balkin, Jack. 1994. Transcendental Deconstruction, Transcendental Justice. Michigan Law Review, 92, 1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry, Norman. 2000. An Introduction to Modern Political Theory, 4th edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Barthes, Roland. 1972. Myth Today. In Mythologies. New York, NY: Noonday Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, Tony and Woollacott, Janet. 1987. Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  10. Bruzzi, Stella. 2005. Bringing Up Daddy: Fatherhood and Masculinity in Post-war Hollywood. London: BFI.Google Scholar
  11. Chase, Anthony. 2002. Movies on Trial: The Legal System on the Silver Screen. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, Alan. 1986. In Bennett, Tony et al. (eds). Popular Culture and Social Relations. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  13. Coltrane, Scott and Parke, Ross D. 1998. Reinventing Fatherhood: Toward an Historical Understanding of Continuity and Change in Men’s Family Lives. Philadelphia, PA: National Center on Fathers and Families, December.Google Scholar
  14. Coontz, Stephanie 1992. The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trip. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Creeber, Glen. 2001. The Television Genre Book. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Culler, Jonathan. 1976. Saussure. New York, NY: Fontana.Google Scholar
  17. Denvir, John. 1996. Legal Reelism: Movies as Legal Texts. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Derrida, Jacques. 1992. Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’. In ed. Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfield and David G. Carlson, Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx, trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1983 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics, trans. Roy Harris. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  21. Feibleman, James K. 1985. Justice, Law and Culture. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldman, Stephen. 2000. American Legal Through from Premodernism to Postmodernism: An Intellectual Voyage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Felski, Rita. 1995. The Gender of Modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fiske, John. 1982. Introduction to Communication Studies. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1997. “In the Exigency of His Longing”: Freud’s Discovery of Law and Fiction in Totem and Taboo. New Formations, 32, 143–156.Google Scholar
  26. Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2001. Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Frank, Jerome. 1949. Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Freud, Sigmund. 1950. Totem and Taboo, trans. J. Strachey. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, Lawrence. 2000. Lexitainment: Legal Process as Theatre. De Paul Law Review, 50, 539.Google Scholar
  30. Frow, John and Morris, Meaghan. 1993. Introduction. In Australian Cultural Studies: A Reader. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gillers, Steven. 1989. Taking LA Law More Seriously. Yale Law Journal, 98, 1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodrich, Peter. 1997. Maladies of the Legal Soul: Psychoanalysis and Interpretation in Law. Washington & Lee Law Review, 54, 1047.Google Scholar
  33. Grant, Judith. 1992. Prime Time Crime: Television Portrayals of Law Enforcement. Journal of American Culture, 15, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hawkes, Terence. 1977. Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fallon, Richard H., Jr.. 1997. “The Rule of Law” as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse. Columbia Law Review, 97, 1.Google Scholar
  36. LaRossa, Ralph. 1997. The Modernization of Fatherhood: A Social and Political History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. LaRossa, Ralph, Jaret, Charles, Gadgil, Malati, and Wynn, Robert G. 2004. The Changing Culture of Fatherhood in Comic-Strip Families: A Six-Decade Analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laster, Kathy. 2000. The Drama of the Courtroom. Sydney: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  39. Litowitz, Douglas E. 1997. Postmodern Philosophy and Law. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  40. Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1985. Just Gaming, trans. Wlad Godzich and Jean-Loup Thebaud. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2001. Can They Do That? Legal Ethics in Popular Culture: Of Characters and Acts. UCLA Law Review, 48, 1305.Google Scholar
  42. Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1985. No Sense of Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Miller, Mark Crispin 1986. Dads Through the Decades: Thirty Years of TV Fathers. In ed. Todd Gitlin, Watching Television. London: Pantheon. Viewecd on 16 July 2009, http://www.medialit.org/reading_room/article38.html.Google Scholar
  44. Mintz, Steven 1996. From Patriarchy to Androgyny and Other Myths: Placing Men’s Family Roles in Historical Perspective. In eds. A. Booth and A. C. Crouter, Men in Families. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 3–30.Google Scholar
  45. Moran, Albert. 1985. Images and Industry: Television Drama Production in Australia. Sydney: Currency Press.Google Scholar
  46. O’Sullivan, Tim, Hartley, John, Saunders, Danny Montgomery, Martin, and Fiske, John. 1994. Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Porsdam, Helle. 1999. Legally Speaking: Contemporary American Culture and the Law. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  48. Redhead, Steve. 1995. Unpopular Cultures: The Birth of Law and Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rushkoff, Douglas. 1994. Media Virus: Hidden Agendas in Popular Culture. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  50. Sarat, Austin. 1999. Rethinking Law and Fatherhood: Male Subjectivity in the Film A Perfect World. Genders, 30. Accessed on 16 July 2009. http://www.genders.org/g30/g30_sarat.html
  51. Sarup, Madan. 1996. Identity, Culture and the Postmodern World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Silverman, Kaja. 1992. Male Subjectivity at the Margins. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Thomas, Jeffrey, E. 2001. Legal Culture and the practice: A postmodern depiction of the rule of law. UCLA Law Review, 48, 1495–1519.Google Scholar
  54. Tushnet, Mark 1996. Class Action. In ed. John Denvir, Legal Reelism: Movies as Legal Texts. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  55. Weber, Max. 1991. Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Talcott Parsons. London: HarperCollins Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swinburne UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Swinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations