Hollywood’s Hero-Lawyer: A Liminal Character and Champion of Equal Liberty

Chapter

Abstract

Hollywood’s hero-lawyer movies are a distinct group of American feature films. Typically, they each depict a lawyer who unwittingly finds himself at the heart of a moral drama involving a client and/or a community in distress, gross injustice, the rule of law and powerful, obstructive forces that must be overcome. Alone with nothing at his side but his professional legal skills, courage, and integrity (and sometimes a good friend and a good woman), the lawyer reluctantly comes to the rescue, often at great personal sacrifice. In the process, he must balance individuality and social commitment, and loyalty to friends, to the law, to the spirit of the law, to the legal community, to justice, and to himself. This chapter argues that Hollywood’s hero-lawyer is the symbolic “champion of equal liberty” as well as a liminal character on the frontier edge of society. This chapter claims that the hero-lawyer’s frontier-based liminality is inseparable from the moral-legal principle of equal liberty that he personifies. This chapter considers the ways in which Hollywood’s hero-lawyer’s liminality is linked with the character’s role as champion of equal liberty. This chapter follows the nuances of the hero-lawyer’s liminality and moral heroism in 15 films, focusing on the classic cinematic formulations of these points and tracing their variations in contemporary film. Presenting the classic Hollywood hero-lawyer films, this chapter demonstrates how contemporary cinematic hero-lawyers (such as Michael Clayton, from 2007) are modeled on their classic predecessors. Yet, in contradistinction to their mythological forerunners, they seem to encounter growing difficulty when coming to the rescue out of the liminal space on the outskirts of society. Contemporary hero-lawyer films present a world in which personal identity is acquired through membership in and identification with a professional elite group such as a corporation or a big law firm. The social world, according to these films, is no longer made up of individuals and their relationships with society but of closed elite groups that supply their members with their social needs. In return, these elite groups exact their members’ absolute adherence and loyalty. Further, despite their liminal personas, the new hero-lawyers often lack a frontier. They are trapped on the edge of an “inside” with no recourse to an “outside,” a Sartrean no-exit hell, if you like. This predicament undercuts the classic construction of the “liminally situated champion of equal liberty,” questioning both the significance of equal liberty and the meaning of liminality.

Keywords

Civil Liberty Elite Group Corporate World American Constitution Civil Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Asimow, M. 1996. When lawyers were heroes. University of San Francisco Law Review 30: 1131–1138.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, T.Lavell. 2006. To kill a mocking bird: Lawyering in an unjust society. In Screening justice – The cinema of law: Films of law, order and social justice, ed. R. Strickland et al. Buffalo: W.S. Hein.Google Scholar
  3. Bergman, P., and M. Asimow. 1996. Reel justice: The courtroom goes to the movies. Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
  4. Eberle, E.J. 2002. Dignity and liberty: Constitutional visions in Germany and the United States. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  5. Garber, M. 2000. Cinema scopes: Evolution, media, and the law. In Law in the domains of culture, ed. A. Sarat and T.R. Kearns, 121–159. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kamir, O. 2000. X-raying Adam’s Rib: Multiple readings of a (feminist?) law-film. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 22: 103–129.Google Scholar
  7. Kamir, O. 2005. Anatomy of Hollywood’s hero-lawyer: A law-and-film study of Western motifs, honor-based values and gender politics underlying anatomy of a murder’s construction of the lawyer image. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 35: 67–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamir, O. 2006a. Law, society and film: Unforgiven’s call to substitute honor with dignity. Law and Society Review 40: 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kamir, O. 2006b. Framed: Women in law and film. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kamir, O. 2009a. Michael Clayton: Hollywood’s contemporary hero-lawyer: Beyond ‘outsider within’ and ‘insider without’. Suffolk University Law Review 42: 829.Google Scholar
  11. Kamir, O. 2009b. North Country’s hero and her cinematic lawyer: Can lawyer films and women’s films merge to launch a new feminist subgenre? CJWL: Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 21: 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lucia, C. 2005. Framing female lawyers. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  13. Moran, J.P. 2002. The scopes trial: A brief history with documents. Boston: Bedford.Google Scholar
  14. Nevins, F.M. 1996. Through the great depression on horseback: Legal themes in Western films of the 1930s. In Legal reelism: Movies as legal texts, ed. J. Denvir, 44–69. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  15. Osborn, J.J. 1996. Atticus finch – The end of honor: A discussion of ‘to kill a mockingbird’. University of San Francisco Law Review 30: 1139–1142.Google Scholar
  16. Ryan, C. 1996. Print the legend: Violence and recognition in The man who shot liberty valance. In Legal reelism: Movies as legal texts, ed. J. Denvir, 23–43. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  17. Strickland, R. 1997. The cinematic lawyer: The magic mirror and the silver screen. Oklahoma Law Review 22: 13–23.Google Scholar
  18. Tompkins, J. 1992. West of everything: The inner life of westerns. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wright, W. 1975. Sixguns & society: A structural study of the Western. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Wright, W. 2001. The wild west: The mythical cowboy and social theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations