Towards a Caring Economy

  • Dimitria Electra GatziaEmail author
Part of the Issues in Business Ethics book series (IBET, volume 34)


The predominant economic theory in the United States and most of the developed world emphasizes competitive relations among individuals or institutions. These relations are often justified by traditional moral concepts such as justice, equality, rights, etc. The ethics of care, on the other hand, emphasizes personal relationships among individuals in their communities and takes interdependence as a necessary condition for achieving individual interests. Prima facie, the ethics of care seems to be, at best, irrelevant and, at worse, inconsistent with this economic theory. I argue that the claim that the ethics of care is irrelevant is misguided. The claim that it is inconsistent with the predominant economic theory, on the other hand, seems correct. This, however, need not be viewed as a flaw of the ethics of care since, I contend, it is more plausibly construed as a flaw of the predominant economic system. The ethics of care is relevant to economic theory in two ways. Firstly, it is relevant in settling disputes within the preferred economic theory. The ethics of care places primary importance on the interests of the individuals who are affected the most by such arrangements. Secondly, it is relevant in evaluating competing economic theories. The ethics of care can ensure that an economic theory creates a system that will positively affect the individuals and their societies by assigning primary roles to them. The relevancy of the ethics of care further suggests that any inconsistency between it and an economic system should count against the economic system. An economic theory, if it is to be justified, must be conducive to the welfare of the individuals in their communities. The ethics of care can help us determine whether an economic theory can be justified.


Economics Social welfare Gross domestic product Neo-liberalism 


  1. Baier, Annette C. 1994. The need for more than justice. In Moral prejudices: Essays on ethics, 18–32. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakan, Joel. 2004. The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baruchello, Giorgio. 2008. Capitalism and freedom: The core of a contradiction—an essay on Cornelius Castoriadis and John McMurtry. Nordicum-mediterraneum: Icelandic e-journal of nordic and mediterranean studies.Google Scholar
  4. Baruchello, Giorgio. 2011. Your money or your life John McMurtry and Martha Nussbaum on the for-profit assault upon life-capabilities. Journal of Philosophy of Life 1 (1): 13–48.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Yoram, and Elaina Rose. 2009. Why are economics students more selfish than the rest? In Department of Economics, University of Washington, WA. Working Papers Series.Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, John B. Jr. 2007. Towards a just and sustainable economic order. In Environmental ethics: An anthology, ed. Light Andrew, and Holmes Rolston III, 359–370. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Cookson, Clive. 2008. Poverty mars formation of infant brains. Financial Times, February 16.Google Scholar
  8. Copp, David. 2006. The oxford handbook of ethical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Daly, Mary. 2002. Care as good for social Policy. Journal of Social Policy 31 (2): 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daly, Herman E. 2005. “Economics in a full world. Scientific American 293 (3): 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daly, Herman E., and Townsend Kenneth N. 1993. Valuing the earth: Economics, ecology, ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Denis, A. 2005. The invisible hand of god in Adam Smith. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 23 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duska, Ronald F. 2006. Contemporary reflections on business ethics. Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, Nancy, and Linda Gordon. 2006. “Dependency” demystified: Inscriptions of power in a keyword of the welfare state. In Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology, ed. Robert E. Goodin, and Philip Pettit, 591–606. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, Milton. 1982. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fryer, David. 2006. Insecurity, and restructuring of unemployment and mental health. In Unemployment and health: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. T. Keiselbach, A. H. Winefield, C. Boyd, S. Anderson, 21–34. Australia: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gelfand, Scott D. 2004. The ethics of care and (capital?) punishment. Law and Philosophy 23: 593–614.Google Scholar
  18. Groenhoul, Ruth E. 2004. Connected lives: Human nature and an ethics of care. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist morality. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Held, Virginia. 2006. The ethics of care personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Loy, David R. 1997. The religion of the market. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 65 (2): 275–290.Google Scholar
  22. Maguire, Daniel C. 2010. Ethics: A compete method for moral choice. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  23. McMurtry, John. 1999. The cancer stage of capitalism. Sterling, VA: Pluto Press. London.Google Scholar
  24. McMurtry, John. 2005. Principles of the good life: The primary theorems of economic reason [Unpublished manuscript circulated amongst EOLSS contributors to the encyclopedia entitled Philosophy and World Problems].Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, Richard R. (ed.). 2005. The limits of market organization. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Nicholls, D. 1992. The invisible hand, providence and the market. In The values of the enterprise culture, ed. P. Heelas and P. Morris, 217–36. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Nürnberger, Klaus. 1998. Beyond marx and market: Outcomes of a century of economic experimentation. New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Pickersgill, Gary M., and Joyce E. Pickersgill. 1974. Contemporary economic systems: A comparative view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Pizarro, David. 2000. Nothing more than feelings?: The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 30: 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1986. The first and second discourses and essays on the origin of languages (trans. and ed. Victor Gourevitch).Google Scholar
  33. Schmitt, John. 2009. Inequality as policy: The United States since 1979. Real-World Economics Review (51): Online journal.Google Scholar
  34. Schweickart, David. 1980. Capitalism or worker control? An ethical and economic appraisal. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Schweickart, David. 1992. Economic democracy: A worthy socialism that would really work. Science and Society 56 (1): 9–38.Google Scholar
  36. Schweickart, David. 1996. Against capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shaw, William H. 2011. Business ethics: A textbook with cases. Wadsworth Publishing (7th edition, 2010).Google Scholar
  38. Singer, Peter. 1994. The famine relief argument. In Social and political philosophy, ed. Elizabeth Smith, and H. Gene Blocker, 456–465. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Slote, Michael. 1998. Justice and caring. Social Philosophy and Policy 15: 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, Susan J. 2005. States, markets, and an ethic of care. Political Geography 24: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sollenius, Jan. 2000. Humane economy. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  42. Tronto, Joan C. 1996. Care as a political concept. In Revisioning the political: Feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory, eds. Nancy J. Hirschmann, and Christine Di Stefano, 139–155. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  43. Varian, Hal R. 2000. What use is economic theory? In Variants in economic theory: Selected works of Hal R. Varian. 352–360. Nothhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. Superseding historic injustice. In Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology, eds. Robert E. Goodin, and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Wilber, Charles K. 1998. Trust, moral hazards, and social economics: Incentives and the organization of work. In Economics, ethics, and public policy, ed. Charles K. Wilber, 93–105. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Wolff, Richard D., and Stephen A. Resnick. 1987. Economics: Marxian versus neoclassical. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe University of Akron Wayne CollegeOrrvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations