Sensing of Photosynthetic Activity of Crops
The light use efficiency of photosynthesis dynamically adapts to environmental factors and is one major factor determining crop yield. Optical remote sensing techniques have the potential to detect physiological and biochemical changes in plant ecosystems, and non-invasive detection of changes in photosynthetic energy conversion may be of great potential for managing agricultural production in a future bio-based economy. Here we give an overview on the principles of optical remote sensing in crop systems with a special emphasis on investigating hyperspectral reflectance data and the sun-induced fluorescence signal. Especially sun-induced fluorescence as a parameter, which becomes important in remote sensing research may have great potential quantifying the physiological status of the photosynthetic apparatus. Both remote sensing principles were applied during the CEFLES2 campaign in Southern France, where the structural and functional status of several crops was measured on the ground and using state-of-the-art optical remote sensing techniques. Sun-induced fluorescence measurements over a variety of crops showed that additional information can be retrieved also over dense canopies, where classical remote sensing signals often saturate. With a view to the future, we discuss how hyperspectral reflectance and sun-induced fluorescence can quantitatively be related to photosynthetic efficiency and help to measure and manage productivity of natural and agricultural ecosystems.
KeywordsPhotosynthetic Efficiency Pigment Composition Saturate Light Pulse Normalize Difference Vegetation IndexNormalized Natural Canopy
This work has been made possible by the funding support of the ESA-projects (1) Technical Assistance for Airborne/Ground Measurements in support of Sentinel-2 mission during CEFLES2 Campaign (ESRIN/Contract No. 20801/07/I-LG) (2) Technical Assistance for Airborne/Ground Measurements in support of FLEX mission proposal during CEFLES2 Campaign (ESRIN/Contract No. 20802/07/I-LG) (3) FLEX Performance analysis and requirements consolidation study (ESTEC/Contract No. 21264/07/NL/FF). Additional financial and intellectual support was provided by the SFB/TR 32 ‘Patterns in Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Systems: Monitoring, Modelling, and Data Assimilation’ – project D2, funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
- Alonso L, Gómez-Chova L, Vila-Francés J et al (2007) Sensitivity analysis of the FLD method for the measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence using a field spectroradiometer. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Remote Sensing of Vegetation Fluorescence, Florence, Italy, 7–9 Feb 2007Google Scholar
- Ananyev G, Kolber ZS, Klimov D et al (2005) Remote sensing of heterogeneity in photosynthetic efficiency, electron transport and dissipation of excess light in Populus deltoides stands under ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations, and in a tropical forest canopy, using a new laser-induced fluorescence transient device. Global Change Biol 11:1195–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Damm A, Elbers J, Erler E et al (2009) Remote sensing of sun induced fluorescence to improve modelling of diurnal courses of gross primary production (GPP). Global Change Biol DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01908.xGoogle Scholar
- Goel NS (1989) Inversion of canopy reflectance models for estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data. In: Asrar G (ed) Theory and applications of optical remote sensing. Wiley, New York, pp 205–251Google Scholar
- Liang SL (2004) Quantitative remote sensing of land surfaces. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Maier SW, Günther KP, Stellmes M (2003) Sun-induced fluorescence: a new tool for precision farming. In: McDonald M, Schepers J, Tartly L et al (eds) Digital imaging and spectral techniques: applications to precision agriculture and crop physiology, vol 66. ASA Special Publication, Madison, pp 209–222Google Scholar
- Meroni M, Rossini M, Guanter L et al (2009) Remote sensing of solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence: review of methods and applications. Rem Sens Environ 113:2037–2051Google Scholar
- Rascher U, Bobich EG, Lin GH et al (2004) Functional diversity of photosynthesis during drought in a model tropical rainforest – the contributions of leaf area, photosynthetic electron transport and stomatal conductance to reduction in net ecosystem carbon exchange. Plant Cell Environ 27:1239–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rascher U, Nichol CL, Small C et al (2007) Monitoring spatio-temporal dynamics of photosynthesis with a portable hyperspectral imaging system. Photogram Eng Rem Sens 73:45–56Google Scholar
- Schreiber U, Bilger W (1993) Progress in chlorophyll fluorescence research: major developments during the past years in retrospect. Proc Bot 53:151–173Google Scholar
- Schulze ED, Caldwell MM (1995) Ecological studies. In: Schulze ED, Caldwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 100Google Scholar