Advertisement

Introduction to Zoosemiotics

  • Dario MartinelliEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 5)

Abstract

Zoosemiotics is a field of inquiry introduced in 1963 by Thomas Albert Sebeok. That is the year when the term and a first definition make their first appearance, initially as a compromise between ethological and semiotic research (in the beginning, Sebeok was convinced that “zoosemiotics” had to be meant mostly as an umbrella term, gathering different scholarly approaches to animal communication). A synthetic definition of zoosemiotics, in the light of its most recent developments, can be today that of the study of semiosis within and across animal species. A spectrum of different possible definitions of the term has been attempted (in the next chapter of this book), but at the end of the day it is probably safe to trace a common ground in the way just mentioned.

Keywords

Nonhuman Animal Humpback Whale Human Identity Semiotic System Paul McCartney 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Searle JR (1975) The logical status of fictional discourse, New Literary Hist 14:319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cimatti F (1998) Mente e linguaggio negli animali. Carrocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  3. Salthe SN (1993) Development and evolution: complexity and change in biology. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Petrilli S (1998) Teoria dei segni e del linguaggio. Edizioni B.A.Graphis, BariGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennett DC (1996) Kinds of minds. Hypercollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Shanahan MP (2006) A cognitive architecture that combines internal simulation with a global workspace. ConsciousCogn 15:433–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbieri M (2009) A short history of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics 2(2):221–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodall J (1971) In the shadow of man. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Sebeok TA (2001b) The Swiss pioneer in nonverbal communication Studies: Heini Hediger (1908–1992) Legas, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouissac P (ed) (1998) Encyclopedia of semiotics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitchell RW (ed) (2002) Pretending and imagination in animals and children. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Sebeok TA (1994) Signs: an introduction to semiotics. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  13. Sebeok TA (1990) Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto Semiotic Circle, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  14. Singer P (1989) All animals are equal. In:. Regan T, Singer P (eds) Animal rights and human obligations. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp 148–162Google Scholar
  15. Hoffmeyer J (1995) The semiotic body-mind. In: Sebeok A, Tasca N (eds) Essays in honor of Thomas, Porto, pp 367–383.Google Scholar
  16. Raby CR, Alexis DM, Dickinson A, Clayton NS (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445:919–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deely J (2009) Basics of semiotics, 5th edn. Tartu University Press, TartuGoogle Scholar
  18. Allport GW (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Sebeok TA (1981) The play of musement. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis D (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Barbieri M (2008) Biosemiotics: a new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften 95(7):577–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freud S (1899) Die Traumdeutung. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig and ViennaGoogle Scholar
  23. Deely J (1990) Basics of semiotics, 1st edn. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  24. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Divers J (2002) Possible worlds. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Bekoff M (1995) Cognitive ethology and the explanation of nonhuman animal behaviour. In: Meyer JA, Roitblat, HL (eds) Comparative approaches to cognitive science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 119–150Google Scholar
  27. Tajfel H (1981) Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Prodi G (1983) Lingua e biologia. In: Segre C (ed) Intorno alla linguistica. Feltrinelli, Milano, pp 172–202Google Scholar
  29. Brooks D, Wiley, EO (1986) Evolution as entropy. Toward a unified theory of biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. Bruner J (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Kull K (1999) Biosemiotics in the twentieth century: a view from biology. Semiotica 127(1/4):385–414Google Scholar
  32. Sebeok TA (1991) A sign is just a sign. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  33. Deely J (2005) Defining the semiotic animal – a postmodern definition of human being. Tip-Top, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoffmeyer J (1997) Biosemiotics: towards a new synthesis in biology? Eur J Semiot Stud 9(2):355–376Google Scholar
  35. Sebeok TA (1998) Come comunicano gli animali che non parlano. Edizioni dal Sud, ModugnoGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoffmeyer J (1996) Signs of meaning in the universe. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothschild FS (1962) Laws of symbolic mediation in the dynamics of self and personality. Ann NY Acad Sci 96:774–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Genette G (1972) Figures III. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  39. Kessel EL (1955) The mating activities of balloon flies. Syst Zool 4:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Brown R (1989) Group processes: dynamics within and between groups. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Herrick P (1999) The many worlds of logic. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Griffin D (1976) The question of animal awareness. Rockefeller University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton WJ, Marler P (1966) Mechanisms of animal behaviour. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Art Research Faculty of ArtsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations