The Implications of the Conceptual Profile in Science Teaching: An Example from a Teaching Sequence in Thermal Physics

Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 42)

Abstract

This chapter deals with practical implications of the conceptual profile theory to the design and development of teaching sequences, using as an example a teaching project in thermal physics with 9th grade students in Brazil. We start with a discussion of a simplified version of the heat conceptual profile model built by Amaral and Mortimer, and then we show how the contents and activities of the teaching sequence fit with the learning demands related to this simplified model. Next, we examine the learning contexts and micro-contexts of the activities that have proved effective in promoting understanding of the potentialities and limitations of the prescientific zones of heat and introducing and strengthening the scientific way of thinking. Finally, we present classroom teaching episodes that indicate how the alternation between authoritative and dialogic discourse contributes to enhance students’ awareness of the heat conceptual profile. The work allowed us to indicate the heuristic potential of this theoretical framework for innovative teaching practices in science education.

Keywords

Scientific Concept Science Classroom Thermal Sensation Thermal Balance Teaching Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguiar, O. G., Jr. (2002). Planejar o ensino considerando a perspectiva da aprendizagem: uma análise de abordagens didáticas na introdução da física térmica [Planning teaching considering the learning perspective: An analysis of pedagogical approaches in the introduction of thermal physics]. Caderno Catarinense de Ensino de Física, 19, 219–241.Google Scholar
  2. Aguiar, O. G., Jr., & Mortimer, E. F. (2005). Tomada de consciência de conflitos: análise da atividade discursiva de uma aula de ciências [Becoming conscious aware of conflicts: Analysis of a classroom discursive activity]. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 10, 179–207.Google Scholar
  3. Aguiar, O. G., Jr., De Caro, C., Paula, H. F., Loureiro, M., Lima, M. E., Castro, R. S., Braga, S. M., & Silva, N. S. (2007). Construindo Consciências [Constructing consciousness] (Vol. 3, 2nd ed.). São Paulo: Scipione.Google Scholar
  4. Aguiar, O. G., Jr., Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and responding to students’ questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 174–193. doi: 10.1002/tea.20315.Google Scholar
  5. Amaral, E. M. R., & Mortimer, E. F. (2001). Uma proposta de perfil conceitual para o conceito de calor [A proposal of a conceptual profile of heat]. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 1, 5–18.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1994). Children’s and lay adults’ views about thermal equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 405–419. doi: 10.1080/0950069940160403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1996). Learning the scientific ‘story’: A case study in the teaching and learning of elementary thermodynamics. Science Education, 80, 249–281. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199606)80:3<249::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bachelard, G. (1996). The formation of the scientific mind. London: Clianmen Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds., V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cafagne, A. (1996). Concepções em termodinâmica: o senso comum e o conhecimento científico [Conceptions in thermodynamics: The common sense and the scientific knowledge]. Doctoral dissertation, Faculdade de Educação, USP, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  11. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. XV). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Erickson, G. (1985). Heat and temperature, Part A. In R. Driver, E. Guesnes, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 52–84). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Leach, J. T., & Scott, P. H. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142. doi: 10.1080/03057260208560189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lijnse, P. (1995). ‘Developmental research’ as a way to an empirically based ‘didactical structure’ of science. Science Education, 79, 189–199. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730790205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mortimer, E. F., Scott, P., Amaral, E. M. R., & El-Hani, C. N. (2010). Modeling modes of thinking and speaking with conceptual profiles. In S. D. J. Pena (Ed.), Themes in transdisciplinary research (pp. 105–137). Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, P., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605–631. doi: 10.1002/sce.20131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silva, D. (1995). Estudo das trajetórias cognitivas de alunos na diferenciação dos conceitos de calor e temperatura [A study of students’ cognitive paths in the differentiation of heat and temperature]. Doctoral dissertation. São Paulo: Faculdade de Educação da USP.Google Scholar
  19. Viennot, L. (1997). Experimental facts and ways of reasoning in thermodynamics: Learners’ common approach. In A. Tiberghien, E. L. Jossem, & J. Barojas (Eds.), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education. London: The International Commission on Physics Education (ICPE). http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/jossem/ICPE/BOOKS.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationFederal University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations