Unraveling the Scientific, Social, Political, and Economic Dimensions of Environmental Issues Through Role-Playing Simulations

Chapter

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is a role-play simulation unit within a college-level interdisciplinary science elective course for preservice teachers. The simulation utilized a United States Senate Subcommittee hearing to explore the use of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) genes in corn. Over an extended time period, students explored the material in depth, which incorporated a wide variety of teaching strategies and topics of current interest in science education (simulations, role-playing, driving questions, oral presentations, technology integration, portfolios, reflection, and concept mapping). The results demonstrated that this type of learning experience can significantly impact students’ understanding of how science is applied to environmental problems. Furthermore, students developed a greater appreciation of the importance of examining the scientific, social, political, economic, and ethical dimensions of environmental issues.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubusson, P., Fogwill, S., Barr, R., & Perkovic, L. (1997). What happens when students do simulation role-play in science? Research in Science Education, 27(4), 565–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessin, R. (1999). Bt-Corn: What is it and how it works. Retrieved October 31, 2002, from http://www.uky.edu/Agriculture/Entomology/entfacts/fldcrops/efl.30.htm
  4. Blogspot. (2009). Blogspot website. Retrieved March 22, 2009, from https://www.blogger.com/start
  5. Council for Environmental Education. (2003). Project WILD: K-12 curriculum and activity guide. Houston, TX: Council for Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. EnviroSci Inquiry. (2008). Abandoned mine drainage module. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.leo.lehigh.edu/envirosci/watershed/riverexp/mine/index.html
  8. Harwood, W. S., MaKinster, J. G., Cruz, L., & Gabel, D. (2002). Acting out science: Using Senate Hearings to debate global climate change. Journal of College Science Teaching, 21(7), 442–447.Google Scholar
  9. Losey, J. E., Rayor, L. S., & Carter, M. E. (1999). Transgenic pollen harms Monarch larvae. Nature, 399(6735), 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research and theory for college and university teachers. Lexington, KY: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  12. Nelson, C. E., Nickels, M. K., & Beard, J. (1998). The nature of science as a foundation for ­teaching science: Evolution as a case study. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. PBwiki. (2009). PBwiki website. Retrieved March 22, 2009, from http://pbwiki.com
  14. Pennock, M. T., & Bardwell, L. V. (1994). Approaching environmental issues in the classroom (pp. 1–23). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  15. Project WET. (2003). Project Wet: K-12 Curriculum and activity guide. Boseman, MT: The Watercourse.Google Scholar
  16. Shelton, A. M., & Roush, R. T. (1999). False reports and the ears of men. Nature Biotechnology, 17(9), 832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shulman, L. S. (2000). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning? The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 48–52.Google Scholar
  18. Webb, D. (2002). Role-playing: A teaching strategy. Retrieved July 11, 2003, from http://condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/~cb6879/spring2002/davidpaper.htm
  19. Wilson, C., & MaKinster, J. (2008). HogWild!: An interdisciplinary unit exploring the environmental issues surrounding the establishment of a hog farm in the Finger Lakes Region. Retrieved from http://fli.hws.edu/gitahead/hogwild/teacher.html
  20. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2004). Beyond STS: A researched-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hobart & William Smith CollegesGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations