Synthesis: The Past, Present and Future of Las Tablas de Daimiel

Chapter
Part of the Wetlands: Ecology, Conservation and Management book series (WECM, volume 2)

Abstract

Great strides have been made in our understanding of the ecology of a semiarid floodplain wetland, Las Tablas de Daimiel National Park (TDNP). Continuous interdisciplinary and collaborative research efforts during the last decades helped increase our understanding of basic and applied aspects of the wetland’s ecology and biogeochemistry. The main message of this book is that human activity irreversibly altered a unique ecosystem in a few decades which evolved over thousands of years. Hydrological disruptions due to aquifer overexploitation resulting from excessive agricultural irrigation, contamination and a series of management interventions that caused more damage than repair form the core of the problem. However, our knowledge is far from complete, especially concerning means to manage the wetland in a way that guarantees both sustainability and development in times of over-exploitation by humans. In addition to summarizing the contents of this book, we will advocate research approaches that could fill remaining information gaps. Critical to the survival of this wetland will not only be scientific progress. An integration of scientific, cultural and historical knowledge in the interaction cycles between ecological, social, political and economic systems should be the ultimate goal. Without this panarchic approach to understanding ecosystems and their management, sustainable development will remain an eternal oxymoron.

Keywords

Treated Waste Water Ecological Component Peat Fire Interaction Cycle Tagus Basin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are most grateful to Andrew Boulton and Miguel Alvarez-Cobelas for helpful comments on previous manuscript drafts.

References

  1. Alba-Tercedor J, Sánchez-Ortega A (1988) Un método rápido y simple para evaluar la calidad de las aguas corrientes basado en el de Hellawell (1978). Limnetica 4:51–56Google Scholar
  2. Altermatt F, Ebert D (2008) Genetic diversity of Daphnia magna populations enhances resistance to parasites. Ecol Lett 11:918–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez-Cobelas M, Rojo C, Angeler DG (2005) Mediterranean limnology: current state, gaps and the future. J Limnol 64:13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angeler DG (2007) Resurrection ecology and global climate change research in freshwater ecosystems. J N Am Benthol Soc 26:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angeler DG, García G (2005) Using emergence from soil propagule banks as indicators of ecological integrity in wetlands: advantages and limitations. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:740–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angeler DG, Sánchez-Carrillo S, García G, Alvarez-Cobelas M (2001) The influence of Procambarus clarkii (Cambaridae, Decapoda) on water quality and sediment characteristics in a semiarid floodplain wetland. Hydrobiologia 464:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Angeler DG, Sánchez-Carrillo S, Alvarez-Cobelas M, Cirujano S, Medina L (2003) Exotic crayfish activity and its effects on water quality: preliminary implications for the alternative stable equilibria in Mediterranean wetlands. J Mediterr Ecol 4:13–21Google Scholar
  8. Angeler DG, Boulton AJ, Jenkins KM, Sánchez B, Alvarez M, Sánchez S (2007) Alternative states and temporary wetlands: research opportunities for understanding effects of anthropogenic stress and natural disturbance. In: Clarkson PA (ed) Environmental research advances. Nova, New York, pp 5–17Google Scholar
  9. Angeler DG, Viedma O, Sánchez-Carrillo S, Alvarez-Cobelas M (2008) Conservation issues of temporary wetland Branchiopoda (Anostraca, Notostraca: Crustacea) in a semiarid agricultural landscape: What spatial scales are relevant? Biol Conserv 141:1224–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Angeler DG, Alvarez-Cobelas M, Rojo C, Sanchez-Carrillo S (2010) Phytoplankton community similarity in a semiarid floodplain during contrasting hydrological connectivity regimes. Ecol Res (DOI: 10.1007/s11284-009-0681-7)Google Scholar
  11. Batzer DP, Rader R, Wissinger SA (1999) Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C et al (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brendonck L, De Meester L (2003) Egg banks in freshwater zooplankton: evolutionary and ecological archives in the sediment. Hydrobiologia 491:65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Constanza R, Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis M (2001) Late Victorain Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB (2006) Foundations of restoration ecology. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ann Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forbes ST (1887) The lake as a microcosm. Bulletin of the Peoria (Illinois) Scientific Association Reprinted in Bulletin Ill Nat Hist Surv 15:537–550 (1925)Google Scholar
  19. Fraser E (2003) Social vulnerability and ecological fragility: building bridges between social and nautral sciences using the Irish potato famine as a case study. Conserv Ecol 7 (online)Google Scholar
  20. Gao X, Giorgi F (2008) Increased aridity in the Mediterranean region under greenhouse gas forcing estimated from high resolution simulations with a regional climate model. Global Planet Change 62:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geiger W, Alcorlo P, Baltanas A et al (2005) Impact of an introduced Crustacean on the trophic webs of Mediterranean wetlands. Biol Invasion 7:49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Harding JS, Benfield EF, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones EBD (1998) Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14843–14847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (2005) Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 11:609–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Claimte Change 2007: the physical science basis. IPCC, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kerfoot WC, Weider LJ (2004) Experimental paleoecology (resurrection ecology): chasing Van Valen’s Red Queen hypothesis. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1300–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerfoot WC, Robbins JA, Weider LJ (1999) A new approach to historical reconstruction: combining descriptive and experimental paleolimnology. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1232–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leuteritz TEJ, Ekiba HR (2008) Not all roads lead to resilience: a complex systems approach to the comparative analysis of tortoises in arid ecosystems. Ecol Soc 13:1. Online at: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art1/ Google Scholar
  33. Levin SA (2006) Learning to live in a global commons: socioeconomic challenges for a sustainable environment. Ecol Res 21:328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Middleton B (1999) Wetland restoration: flood pulsing and disturbance dynamics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Moreno JM (2005) Evaluación preliminar de los impactos en España por efecto del cambio climático. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  37. Moyer B, McAllister A, Finley ML, Soifer S (2001) Doing democracy: the MAP model for organizing social movements. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL (1997) Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecol 5:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reber A, Castella G, Christe P, Chapuisat M (2008) Experimentally increased group diversity improves disease resistance in an ant species. Ecol Lett 11:682–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schweinfurth U (1982) Landscape change and geomedical consequences in the highlands of Sri Lanka (Cylon). Mountain Res Devel 2:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Stockwell CA, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (2003) Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 18:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wenthworth Group (2003) Blueprint for a national water plan. The Wentworth Group, WWF AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  44. Zedler JB (2000) Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:402–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aquatic Sciences and AssessmentSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations