From Democracy to Management-Oriented Leadership? The Manager-Academic in Norwegian Higher Education

Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 33)

Abstract

This chapter describes recent changes and reforms in the governance and leadership structure in Norwegian higher education. The main questions in the analysis are as follows: In what direction has the leadership structure in Norwegian higher education moved? Are we witnessing a development towards a less democratic structure with a subsequent change towards a more management-oriented structure, or is another picture emerging? There are still democratic elements in the middle-management structure in Norwegian higher education, both in formal arrangements and in how the system is carried out in practice. And, even though many democratic elements are no longer mandatory, it is still possible for the institutions to pursue a democratic structure, but not one that is prescribed and predefined by the state authorities. The structure still has some democratic features, even though changes make it difficult to use the label democracy. While it could be argued that representative democracy is under pressure, deliberative democracy seems to have established roots in the leadership style in Norwegian higher education.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution Departmental Level Academic Staff Governing Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bendix, R., & Rokkan, S. (1962). The extension of national citizenship to the lower classes: A comparative perspective. Paper presented at the 5th World Congress of Sociology, Washington, DC, 2–8 September, 1962.Google Scholar
  2. Bleiklie, I., Tjomsland, M., & Østergren, K. (2006). Ledelse og styringsformer ved universiteter og høgskoler. In S. Michelsen & P. O. Aamodt (Eds.), Kvalitetsreformen møter virkeligheten (pp. 121–141). Oslo/Bergen: Norges forskningsråd.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2001). New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (1998). Democracy and liberty. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 185–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elster, J. (1998). Introduction. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gornitzka, Å., & Larsen, I. M. (2004). Towards professionalisation? Restructuring of administrative work force in universities. Higher Education, 47(4), 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gulddahl Rasmussen, J. (2002). Management between the shop floor and the corporate level. European Journal of Education, 37(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  9. Hood, C. (1995). The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hope, K. L., Ringkjøb, H. E., & Rykkja, L. H. (2008). Evaluering av styring og ledelse ved NTNU. Rapport 4/2008. Bergen: Rokkansenteret.Google Scholar
  11. Larsen, I. M. (1999). Evaluering av høgskolereformen – Høgskolestyrets styringsrolle og høgskolerådet rådgivningsrolle. Delrapport 5. Oslo: Norges Forskningsråd.Google Scholar
  12. Larsen, I. M. (2000). Research policy at Norwegian universities: Walking the tightrope between internal and external interests. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larsen, I. M. (2002). Between control, rituals and politics: The governing board in higher education institutions in Norway. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 99–119). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Larsen, I. M. (2003). Departmental leadership in Norwegian universities: In between two models of governance. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 71–88). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen, I. M., & Gornitzka, Å. (1995). New management systems in Norwegian universities: The interface between reform and institutional understanding. European Journal of Education, 30(3), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larsen, I. M., & Langfeldt, L. (2005). Profiling comprehensiveness? Strategy formulation and effects of strategic programmes at traditional universities. In Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education (pp. 343–361). Dordrecht: Kluwer-Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larsen, I. M., Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2009). Four basic dilemmas in university governance reform. Journal of Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(3), 33–50.Google Scholar
  18. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Meek, V. L. (2003). Introduction. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michelsen, S., & Aamodt, P. O. (2007). Evaluering av kvalitetsreformen – sluttrapport. Oslo/Bergen: Norges forskningsråd.Google Scholar
  22. Midgaard, K. (2004). Gode styreformer og demokrati. In K. Midgaard & B. E. Rasch (Eds.), Demokrati – vilkår og virkninger (pp. 21–50). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Education. (2009). Tilstandsrapport for høyere utdanningsinstitusjoner. Oslo: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  24. Olsen, J. P. (1990). Demokrati på svenska. Stockholm: Carlson Bokförlag.Google Scholar
  25. Olsen, J. P. (1996). Norway: Slow learner – Or another triumph of the tortoise? In J. P. Olsen & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Lessons from experience (pp. 180–213). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Peters, B. G. (2001). The future of governing. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  27. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. G. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trow, M. (1994). Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. Higher Education Policy, 7(2), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oslo University CollegeOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations