Archimedes in Ancient Roman World

Conference paper
Part of the History of Mechanism and Machine Science book series (HMMS, volume 11)

Abstract

Cicero’s rediscovery of Archimedes’ tomb shows the interest for the Sicilian scientist in Rome, even if in Italy Archimedes’ geometry was put into practice only by architects and by Gromatici, a sort of practical technicians who worked primarily in military and agricultural fields (we have some clear information about their work in a wonderful manuscript of the sixth century now in Wolfenbüttel). Some poets of the classical period were interested in the combination of numbers (like Catullus’ 5 or 7 and Virgil’s Georgics 2), but they never did open references to Archimedes, for metrical difficulties and embarrassed by his astonishing killing during the Roman occupation of Syracuse. Archimedes’ life and death had an important part on the confluence of eastern and western culture in the third and second centuries B.C., but a good image of the scientist received serious obstacles by the difficulties of his theoretical works (Cicero also didn’t read and understand the mathematical and physical ones) and by his strong and open struggle against the Romans.

Keywords

Intellectual Capital Sixth Century Open Reference Roman Supremacy Arab Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lorenzo Braccesi, “L’assassinio di Archimede”, Hesperia 22, 2008, 161-166.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mario Geymonat, “Il grande Archimede”, Sandro Teti Editore, Roma, 20083.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mario Geymonat, “Archimede: spirito moderno di uno scienziato antico”, Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana 8, 10-A, 2007, 427-440.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mary Jaeger, “Archimedes and the Roman Imagination”, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2008 (with my review in Classical World 103.1, 2009).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reviel Netz, “The Works of Archimedes I (On the Sphere and Cylinder)”, Translation and Commentary, Cambridge University Press 2004.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reviel Netz, Fabio Acerbi, Nigel Wilson, “Towards a Reconstruction of Archimedes’ Stomachion”, Sciamus 5, 2004, 67-99.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reviel Netz and William Noel, “The Archimedes Codex”, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robin G.M. Nisbet and Margaret Hubbard, “A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book 1”, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of Latin Literature in University Ca’ FoscariVeneziaItaly

Personalised recommendations