Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Issues in Business Ethics book series (IBET, volume 27)

Abstract

According to Hitt (1998), “we are on the precipice of an epoch,” in the midst of a new economic age, in which twenty-first century organizations are facing a complex competitive landscape driven largely by globalization and the technological revolution. This new age is about an economy where knowledge is a core commodity and the rapid production of knowledge and innovation is critical to organizational survival (Bettis and Hitt, 1995; Boisot, 1998). Consistent with these changes, much discussion is taking place in the management literature regarding challenges facing organizations in a transitioning world (Barkema et al., 2002; Bettis and Hitt, 1995; Child and McGrath, 2001).

Keywords

Complex Adaptive System Task Conflict Complexity Science Adaptive Dynamic Complex Network Dynamic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Achtenhagen, L., L. Melin, T. Mullern and T. Ericson (2003). Leadership: The role of interactive strategizing. In A. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, F.A.J. Van Den Bosch, W. Ruigrok and T. Numagami (eds.), Innovative forms of organizing: International perspectives. London: Sage Publications, pp. 49–71.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, P. (2001). A complex systems approach to learning in adaptive networks. International Journal of Innovation Management 5:149–180.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. and S. Sveningsson (2003). The great disappearing act: Difficulties in doing “Leadership.”. The Leadership Quarterly 14:359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur, W.B. (1989). The economy and complexity. In D.L. Stein (ed.), Lectures in the sciences of complexity, vol. 1. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 713–740.Google Scholar
  5. Ashby, W.R. (1960). Design for a Brain, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bak, P. (1996). How Nature Works. New York, NY: Copernicus.Google Scholar
  7. Bamford, J.D., B. Gomes-Casseres and M.S. Robinson (2002). Mastering Alliance Strategy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Barkema, H.G., J.A.C. Baum and E.A. Mannix (2002). Management challenges in a new time. Academy of Management Journal 45(5):916–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnard, C.I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bedeian, A.G. and J.G. Hunt (2006). Academic amnesia and vestigial assumptions of our forefathers. The Leadership Quarterly 17(2):190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bettis, R.A. and M.A. Hitt (1995). The new competitive landscape 7(13). Strategic Management Journal 7(13):7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bennis, W. (1996). Becoming a leader of leaders. In R. Gibson (Ed.), Rethinking the future (pp. 148–163). London: Brealey.Google Scholar
  14. Bluedorn, A.C., R.A. Johnson, D.K. Cartwright and B.R. Barringer (1994). The interface and convergence of the strategic management and organizational environment domains. Journal of Management 20(2):201–262.Google Scholar
  15. Boal, K., C.J. Whitehead, R. Phillips and J. Hunt (1992). Strategic Leadership: A Multiorganizational-level Perspective. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  16. Boisot, M.H. (1998). Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bonabeau, E. and C. Meyer (2001). Swarm intelligence: A whole new way to think about business. Harvard Business Review 79(5):107–114.Google Scholar
  18. Bradbury, H. and B. Lichtenstein (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science 11:551–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carley, K. (1997). Organizational adaptation. Annals of Operations Research 75:25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carley, K. and V. Hill (2001). Structural change and learning within organizations. In A. Lomi and E.R. Larsen (eds.), Dynamics of Organizational Societies. Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
  21. Carley, K. and J.S. Lee (1998). Dynamic organizations: Organizational adaptation in a changing environment. Advances in Strategic Management: A Research Annual 15:269–297.Google Scholar
  22. Carley, K. and Y. Ren (2001). Tradeoffs Between Performance and Adaptability for c 3 i Architectures (part of the A2C2 Project Supported in Part by the Office of Naval Research). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  23. Carley, K. and D.M. Svoboda (1996). Modeling organizational adaptation as a simulated annealing process. Sociological Methods and Research 25(1):138–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Child, J. and R.G. McGrath (2001). Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. The Academy of Management Journal 44(6):1135–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Cilliers, P. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management 5:135–147.Google Scholar
  27. Conger, J.A. (1999). Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider’s perspective on these developing streams of research. The Leadership Quarterly 10(2):145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Coveney, P. (2003). Self-organization and complexity: A new age for theory, computation and experiment. Paper presented at the Nobel symposium on self-organization, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  29. Cusumano, M. (2001). Focusing creativity: Microsoft’s “Synch and stabilize” Approach to software product development. In I. Nonaka and T. Nishiguchi (eds.), Knowledge Emergence: Social, Technical, and Evolutionary Dimensions of Knowledge Creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–123.Google Scholar
  30. Davenport, T.H. (2001). Knowledge work and the future of management. In W.G. Bennis, G.M. Spreitzer and T.G. Cummings (eds.), The Future of Leadership: Today’s Top Leadership Thinkers Speak to Tomorrow’s Leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
  31. Day, D.V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly 11(4):581–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dooley, K.J. (2000). Complex adaptive systems: A nominal definition, October 26, 1996. Retrieved September, 2006, from http://www.eas.asu.edu/~kdooley/casopdef.html
  33. Dougherty, D. (1996). Organizing for innovation. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp. 424–439.Google Scholar
  34. Dougherty, D. and C. Hardy (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal 39:1120–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Drath, W. (2001). The Deep Blue Sea: Rethinking the Source of Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  36. Drucker, P.F. (1998). Management’s new paradigms (cover story). Forbes 162(7):152–170.Google Scholar
  37. Drucker, P.F. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  38. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32:543–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Finkelstein, S. and D.C. Hambrick (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  40. Fletcher, J.K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly 15:647–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goodwin, B. (1994). How the Leopard Changed its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  42. Gronn, P. (1999). A realist view of leadership. Paper presented at the educational leaders for the new millenium – Leaders with soul. ELO-AusAsia On-line Conference.Google Scholar
  43. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 13:423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Halal, W.E. (ed.) (1998). The Infinite Resource: Mastering the Boundless Power of Knowledge. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Halal, W.E. and K.B. Taylor (eds.) (1999). Twenty-first Century Economics: Perspectives of Socioeconomics for a Changing World. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Heckscher, C. (1994). Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In C.Heckscher and A. Donnellon (eds.), The Post-bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal 15:73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heifetz, R.A. (1994). Leadership Without Easy Answers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Heifetz, R.A. and D.L. Laurie (2001). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review 79(11):131–141.Google Scholar
  50. Heifetz, R.A. and M. Linsky (2002). Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive Through the Dangers of Leading. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Henrickson, L. and B. McKelvey (2002). Foundations of “new” social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism and agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(3):7288–7295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hernes, G. (1998). Real virtuality. In P. Hedström and R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hitt, M.A. (1998). Presidential address: Twenty-first century organizations: Business firms, business schools, and the academy. The Academy of Management Review 23:218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Holland, J.H. (1995). Hidden Order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  55. Homans, G.C. (1950). The Human Group. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  56. Hosking, D.M. (1988). Organizing, leadership and skilful process. Journal of Management Studies 25:147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. House, R.J. and T. Mitchell (1974). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Journal of Contemporary Business:81–97.Google Scholar
  58. Howell, J.M. and K. Boies (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly 15(1):123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hunt, J. (1999). Transformational/charismatic leadership’s transformation of the field: An historical essay. The Leadership Quarterly 10(2):129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hunt, J. and A. Ropo (1995). Multi-level leadership – Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of general motors. The Leadership Quarterly 6(3):379–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Huxham, C. and S. Vangen (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal 43(6):1159–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ilinitch, A.Y., R.A. D’Aveni and A. Lewin (1996). New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science 7:211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jaques, E. (1989). Requisite Organization. Arlington, VA: Cason Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Jaussi, K.S. and S.D. Dionne (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly 14:475–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jehn, K.A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 42:530–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jennings, J. and L. Haughton (2000). It’s Not the Big That Eat the Small… it’s the Fast That Eat the Slow. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  67. Jones, G.R. (2000). Organizational Theory, 3rd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  68. Kauffman, S.A. (1993). The Origins of Order. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Kontopoulos, K.M. (1993). The Logics of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Krause, D.E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly 15(1):79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  72. Levy, S. (1992). Artificial Life: The Quest for New Creation. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  73. Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In G.E. Swanson, T.M. Newcomb and E.L. Hartley (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology, Rev. edn. New York, NY: Holt, pp. 459–473.Google Scholar
  74. Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  75. Lewin, A. (1999). Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Lichtenstein, B., M. Uhl-Bien, R. Marion, A. Seers, D. Orton and C. Schreiber, (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 8(4):2–12.Google Scholar
  77. Lorenz, E. (1993). The Essence of Chaos. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mackenzie, K. (2006). The LAMPE theory of organizational leadership. In F. Yammarino and F. Dansereau (eds.), Research in multi-level issues, vol. 12. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  79. Mandelbrot, B.B. (1983). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  80. Manville, B. and J. Ober (2003, Jan.). Beyond empowerment: Building a company of citizens. Harvard Business Review 81:48–53.Google Scholar
  81. Marion, R. (1999). The Edge of Organization: Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Marion, R. and M. Uhl-Bien (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly 12:389–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Marion, R. and M. Uhl-Bien (2003). Complexity theory and Al-Qaeda: Examining complex leadership. Emergence: A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management 5:56–78.Google Scholar
  84. Marion, R. and M. Uhl-Bien (2007). Complexity and strategic leadership. In R. Hooijberg, J. Hunt, J. Antonakis, K. Boal and N. Lane (eds.), Being There Even When you are not: Leading Through Structures, Systems, and Processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  85. McKelvey, B. (2001). Energizing order-creating networks of distributed intelligence. International Journal of Innovation Management 5:181–212.Google Scholar
  86. McKelvey, B. (2008). Emergent strategy via complexity leadership: Using complexity science and adaptive tension to build distributed intelligence. In M. Uhl-Bien and R. Marion (eds.), Complexity Theory and Leadership, Vol. 1: Conceptual Foundations. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, pp. 225–268.Google Scholar
  87. McKelvey, B. and M.H. Boisot (2003). Transcendental organizational foresight in nonlinear contexts. Paper presented at the INSEAD Conference on Expanding Perspectives on Strategy Processes, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
  88. McKelvey, B., R. Marion and M. Uhl-Bien (2003). A simple-rule approach to CEO leadership in the 21st century. Paper presented at the University of Lecce Conference on New Approaches to Strategic Management, Ostuni, Italy.Google Scholar
  89. McKelvey, B., H. Mintzberg, T. Petzinger, L. Prusak, P. Senge and R. Shultz (1999). The gurus speak: Complexity and organizations. Emergence: A journal of complexity issues in organizations and management 1(1):73–91.Google Scholar
  90. Miles, R.E. (1998). The spherical network organization. In W.E. Halal (ed.), The Infinite Resource: Creating and Leading the Knowledge Enterprise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
  91. Miles, R.E., C.C. Snow, J.A. Matthews and G. Miles (1999). Cellular-network organizations. In W.E. Halal and K.B. Taylor (eds.), Twenty-first Century Economics. New York, NY: Macmillan, pp. 155–173.Google Scholar
  92. Mumford, M., K.E. Bedell-Avers and S.T. Hunter (2008). Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. In M.D. Mumford, S.T. Hunter and K.E. Bedell (eds.), Research in Multi-level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier 7:107–157Google Scholar
  93. Mumford, M., S. Connelly and B. Gaddis (2003). How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases. The Leadership Quarterly 14(4/5, Pt. 1):411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Mumford, M.D. and B. Licuanan (2004). Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions. The Leadership Quarterly 15(1):163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mumford, M.D., R.A. Schultz and H.K. Osburn (2002a). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. In F.J. Yammarino and F. Dansereau (eds.), Research in Multi-level Issues: The Many Faces of Multi-level Issues. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mumford, M.D., G.M. Scott, B. Gaddis and J.M. Strange (2002b). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly 13(6):705–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nonaka, I. and T. Nishiguchi (2001). Introduction: Knowledge emergence. In I. Nonaka and T. Nishiguchi (eds.), Knowledge Emergence: Social, Technical, and Evolutionary Dimensions of Knowledge creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  98. Osborn, R. and J. Hunt (2007). Leadership and the choice of order: Complexity and hierarchical perspectives near the edge of chaos. The Leadership Quarterly 18(4):319–340.Google Scholar
  99. Osborn, R., J.G. Hunt and L.R. Jauch (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 13:797–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Parks, S.D. (2005). Leadership Can Be Taught: A Bold Approach for a Complex World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  101. Pearce, C.L. and J.A. Conger (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  102. Pfeffer, J. (2005). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. The Academy of Management Executive 19(4):95–108.Google Scholar
  103. Phillips, R. and J. Hunt (eds.) (1992). Strategic Leadership: A Multiorganizational-level Perspective. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  104. Popper, K.R. (1986). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Prigogine, I. (1997). The End of Certainty. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  106. Prusak, L. (1996). The knowledge advantage. Strategy & Leadership 24:6–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Quinn, J.B., P. Anderson and S. Finkelstein (2002). Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. In S. Little, P. Quintas and T. Ray (eds.), Managing Knowledge: An Essential Reader. London: Sage, pp. 335–348.Google Scholar
  108. Reiter-Palmon, R. and J.J. Illies (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from the creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly 15:55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rost, J.C. (1991). Leadership for the Twenty-first Century. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  110. Roy, D. (1954). Efficiency and ‘the fix’: Informal intergroup relations in a piecework machine shop. American Journal of Sociology 60:255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schilling, M.A. and H.K. Steensma (2001). The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal 44(6):1149–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schneider, M. (2002). A stakeholder model of organizational leadership. Organization Science 13(2):209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Schneider, M. and M. Somers (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly 17(4):351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Schreiber, C. (2006). Human and organizational risk modeling: Critical personnel and leadership in network organizations. Unpublished Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  115. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organizations. American Sociological Review 13:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  117. Shalley, C.E. and L.L. Gilson (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly 15(1):33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Simon, H.A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106:467–482.Google Scholar
  119. Stacey, R.D., D. Griffin and P. Shaw (2000). Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  120. Sterman, J.D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review 10:291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Streatfield, P.J. (2001). The Paradox of Control in Organizations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thomas, C., R. Kaminska-Labbé and B. McKelvey (2005). Managing the MNC and exploitation/exploration dilemma: From static balance to dynamic oscillation. In G. Szulanski, Y. Doz and J. Porac (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management: Expanding Perspectives on the Strategy Process, vol. 22. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 213–250.Google Scholar
  123. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly 17:654–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Volberda, H.W. (1996). Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science 7(4):359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Weick, K.E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Weisburg, R. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R.J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 226–259.Google Scholar
  127. West, M.A., C.S. Borill, J.F. Dawson and F. Brodbeck (2003). Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care. The Leadership Quarterly 14:393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Yukl, G. (2005). Leadership in Organizations, 6th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  129. Zaccaro, S.J. and R.J. Klimoski (2001). The nature of organizational leadership: An introduction. In S.J. Zaccaro and R.J. Klimoski (eds.), The nature of Organizational Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3–41.Google Scholar
  130. Zohar, D. (1997). Rewiring the Corporate Brain. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Innovative Leadership, University of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School, Clemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.Anderson School, UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations