Data and Methods

Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 27)

Abstract

This chapter introduces data and methods that will be used throughout the study. The chapter provides a list of newly available male fertility datasets, including those to be analyzed in this book. It also discusses the strengths and limitations of those data sources. Moreover, the chapter addresses the issue of data quality in male fertility reports and evaluates the quality of data to be examined in this book. As far as methodology, the Poisson regression models and Stata survey commands are introduced to enlighten the reader the methodological and statistical issues that are associated with this research. The discussion of data and methods also allows future research to replicate and extend findings of this current analysis.

Keywords

Male Fertility Current Population Survey Female Fertility World Fertility Survey Female Fertility Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allison, P. (1999). Multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  2. Auriat, N. (1991). Who forgets? An analysis of memory effects in a retrospective survey on migration history. European Journal of Population, 7(4), 311–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachrach, C. A., Evans, V. J., Ellison, S. A., & Stolley, K. S. (1992). What price do we pay for single sex fertility surveys? Paper presented at the Population Association of America (PAA) Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  4. Bachu, A. (1996). Fertility of American men: U.S. Census Bureau Population Division Working Paper, No.14.Google Scholar
  5. Cherlin, A., Griffith, J., & McCarthy, J. (1983). A note on maritally-disrupted men’s reports of child support in the June 1980 current population survey. Demography, 20(3), 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, D. A. (2000). Male fertility trends in industrial countries: Theories in search of some evidence. In C. Bledsoe, J. I. Guyer, & S. Lerner (Eds.), Fertility and male life-cycle in the era of fertility decline (pp. 29–60). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coughlin, M. T., LaPorte, R. E., O’Leary, L., & Lee, P. A. (1998). How accurate is male recall of reproductive information? American Journal of Epidemiology, 148(8), 806–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courgeau, D. (1992). Impact of response errors on event history analysis. Population: An English Selection, 4, 97–110.Google Scholar
  9. Fikree, F. F., Gray, R. H., & Shah, F. (1993). Can men be trusted? A comparison of pregnancy histories reported by husbands and wives. American Journal of Epidemiology, 138(4), 237–242.Google Scholar
  10. Greene, M. E., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000). Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review, 26(1), 81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hertrich, V. (1998). Are men’s and women’s answers to be equally trusted? A dual collection of birth and marriage histories in a population in Mali. Population: An English Selection, 10(2), 303–318.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, E. F., & Forrest, J. D. (1992). Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women. Demography, 29(1), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (2nd Edn). College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  14. National Center for Health Statistics (2004). Public use data file documentation, national survey of family growth cycle 6: 2002, user’s guide. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  15. National Center for Health Statistics (2005). Fertility, family planning and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 national survey of family growth. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  16. Poston, D. L. J., & Chang, C.-F. (2005). Bringing males in: A critical demographic plea for incorporating males in methodological and theoretical analyses of human fertility. Critical Demography, 1(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Poulain, M., Rianey, B., & Firdion, J.-M. (1992). Data from a life history survey and the Belgian population register: A comparison. Population: An English Selection, 4, 77–96.Google Scholar
  18. Ratcliffe, A. A., Hill, A. G., Harrington, D. P., & Walraven, G. (2002). Reporting of fertility events by men and women in rural Gambia. Demography, 39(3), 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rendall, M. S., Clarke, L., Peters, H. E., Ranjit, N., & Verropoulou, G. (1999). Incomplete reporting of men’s fertility in the United States and Britain: A research note. Demography, 36(1), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rendall, M. S., Joyner, K., Peters, H. E., Yang, F., Handcock, M. S., & Ryan, A. (2006). A Bayesian approach to combining population and survey data for male fertility estimation. Paper presented at the annual meetings of population association of America, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  21. Seltzer, W. (1973). Demographic data collection: A summary of experience. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  22. Seltzer, J. A., & Brandreth, Y. (1994). What fathers say about involvement with children after separation. Journal of Family Issues, 15(1), 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sorensen, E. (1997). A national profile of nonresident fathers and their ability to pay child support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(4), 785–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sprehe, J. T. (1974). The world fertility survey: An international program of fertility research. Studies in Family Planning, 5(2), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. The Ministry of the Interior of Republic of China (2005). Taiwan-Fukien demographic fact book. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior of Republic of China.Google Scholar
  26. Thomas, V. S. (1996). The age pattern of male fertility in the U.S. 1957–1964 birth cohorts Unpublished Dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  27. United Nations (2001). Demographic yearbook 2001. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  28. Yaukey, D., Roberts, B. J., & Griffith, W. (1965). Husbands’ vs. wives’ responses to a fertility survey. Population Studies, XIX(1), 29–43.Google Scholar
  29. Zarate, A. O. (1967). A note on the accuracy of male responses to questions on fertility. Demography, 4(2), 846–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public AffairsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations