Introduction and Overview

Chapter
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 27)

Abstract

The first chapter is an introductory chapter which discusses the research background and provides an overview of the book. The chapter starts with a brief introduction of the female-dominated tradition in demographic and sociological studies of fertility. The chapter then discusses a number of reasons, including biological, sociological and methodological matters that have caused men to be ignored in conventional studies of fertility. Despite the female-dominated tradition in fertility studies, the chapter highlights a growing body of literature on male fertility, which indicates that men have received an increasing amount of research attention in recent years. In the end, the chapter emphasizes the importance of bringing men into fertility research. The chapter also outlines the objectives and the structure of the book and points out how this book improves existing literature on male fertility.

Keywords

Male Fertility Fertility Decline Female Fertility Nonmarital Birth Fertility Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bledsoe, C., Guyer, J., & Lerner, S. (2000). Fertility and male life-cycle in the era of fertility decline. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bledsoe, C., Guyer, J. I., & Lerner, S. (2000). Introduction. In C. Bledsoe, J. I. Guyer, & S. Lerner (Eds.), Fertility and male life-cycle in the era of fertility decline (pp. 1–26). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bongaarts, J. (1994). The impact of the proximate determinants of fertility: A comment on reinis. Population Studies, 48(1), 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theories of fertility decline. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, D. A. (2000). Male fertility trends in industrial countries: Theories in search of some evidence. In C. Bledsoe, J. I. Guyer, & S. Lerner (Eds.), Fertility and male life-cycle in the era of fertility decline (pp. 29–60). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Corijn, M., & Klijzing, E. (2001). Transitions to adulthood in Europe. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Courgeau, D. (1992). Impact of response errors on event history analysis. Population: An English Selection, 4, 97–110.Google Scholar
  8. Dribe, M., & Stanfors, M. A. (2006). Education, work, and parenthood: The experience of young men and women in post-war Sweden. California: Paper presented at the Population Association of America (PAA) Annual Meeting, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  9. Goldscheider, F. K., & Kaufman, G. (1996). Fertility and commitment: Bringing men back in. Population and Development Review, 22(Supplement: Fertility in the United States” New Patterns, New Theories), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene, M. E., & Biddlecom, A. E. (2000). Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review, 26(1), 81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenhalgh, S. (1990). Toward a political economy of fertility: Anthropological contributions. Population and Development Review, 16(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guzzo, K. B., & Furstenberg, F. F. J. (2006). Paper presented at the population association of America (PAA) annual meeting, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  13. Hertrich, V. (1998). Are men’s and women’s answers to be equally trusted? A dual collection of birth and marriage histories in a population in Mali. Population: An English Selection, 10(2), 303–318.Google Scholar
  14. Hynes, K., Yang, F. T. -A., Joyner, K., & Peters, H. E. (2006). The transition to early fatherhood: National estimates based on multiple surveys. Montreal: Paper presented at the American Sociological Association (ASA) Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  15. Juby, H., & Bourdais, C. L. (1998). The changing context of fatherhood in Canada: A life course analysis. Population Studies, 52(2), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keyfitz, N. (1977). Applied mathematical demography. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Magnani, R. J., Bertrand, J. T., Makani, B., & McDonald, S. W. (1995). Men, marriage and fatherhood in Kinshasa, Zaire. International Family Planning Perspectives, 21(1), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan, S. P., & Hagewen, K. J. (2005). Fertility. In D. L. J. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 229–251). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Notestein, F. W. (1953). Economic problems of population change proceedings of the eighth international conference of agricultural Economists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Paget, W. J., & Timaeus, I. M. (1994). A relational Gompertz model of male fertility: Development and assessment. Population Studies, 48(2), 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pollak, R. A. (1986). A reformulation of the two-sex problem. Demography, 23(2), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Poston, D. L. J., & Chang, C. -F. (2005). Bringing males in: A critical demographic plea for incorporating males in methodological and theoretical analyses of human fertility. Critical Demography, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
  23. Poston, D. L., & Frisbie, W. P. (2005). Ecological demography. In D. L. J. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 601–624). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Poulain, M., Rianey, B., & Firdion, J. -M. (1992). Data from a life history survey and the Belgian population register: A comparison. Population: An English Selection, 4, 77–96.Google Scholar
  25. Rendall, M. S., Joyner, K., Peters, H. E., Yang, F., Handcock, M. S., & Ryan, A. (2006). A Bayesian approach to combining population and survey data for male fertility estimation. Los Angeles: Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of Population Association of America.Google Scholar
  26. Schoen, R. (1981). The harmonic mean as the basis of a realistic two-sex marriage model. Demography, 18(2), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seltzer, W. (1973). Demographic data collection: A summary of experience. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  28. Shryock, H. S., & Siegel, J. S. (1976). The methods and materials of demography. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Watkins, S. C. (1991). From provinces into nations: Demographic integration in Western Europe, 1870–1960. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Watkins, S. C. (1993). If all we know about women was what we read in demography, what should we know? Demography, 30(4), 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood, J. W. (1994). Dynamics of human reproduction: Biology, biometry and demography. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  32. Zhang, L. (2006). Patterns of male and female fertility. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association (ASA) Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public AffairsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations