The Second Demographic Transition Meets Globalization: A Comprehensive Theory to Understand Changes in Family Formation in an Era of Rising Uncertainty

Chapter
Part of the Life Course Research and Social Policies book series (LCRS, volume 1)

Abstract

Since the late 1960s, there have been significant changes in partnership, fertility and family formation in many Western societies, first described in the concept of the second demographic transition (SDT). Since the 1980s, however, an additional series of broader transformations occurred, often termed globalization, which is characterized by increasingly volatile financial markets, accelerating speed of change and interdependence of networks. This chapter compares and contrasts the two large-scale heuristic frameworks of the SDT and globalization, with the goal of producing a more comprehensive theory to understand family formation and pathways to adulthood. We first define these two approaches, followed by a comparison of differences and overlapping features. We conclude with a critical reflection of the added-value of comparing and synthesizing the two approaches and provide suggestions for future extensions.

References

  1. Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2002). Globalization and the great u-turn: Income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries. The American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1244–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allmendinger, J. (1989). Educational system and labor market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 3, 231–250.Google Scholar
  3. Ariès, P. (1980). Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West. Population and Development Review, 6(4), 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auer, P., & Cazes, S. (2000). The resilience of the long-term employment relationship: Evidence from the industrialized countries. International Labour Review, 139(4), 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P. (Ed.). (1995). The new role of women: Family formation in modern societies. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Drobnič, S. (Eds.). (2001). Careers of couples in contemporary societies: A cross-national comparison of the transition from male breadwinner to dual earner families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Prein, G. (1998). Rational choice theory and large-scale data analysis. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Stockmann, R. (1998/99). Globalization and chances in vocational training systems in developing and advanced industrialized societies (Vol. I-III). Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  9. Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., & Kurz, K. (Eds.). (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (Advances in Sociology Series). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4(1), 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brady, D., Beckfield, J., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2005). Economic globalization and the welfare state in affluent democracies, 1975–2001. American Sociological Review, 70, 921–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breen, R. (1997). Risk, recommodification and stratification. Sociology, 31(3), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burton-Jones, A. (1999). Knowledge capitalism: Business, work and learning in the new economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. I). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Castles, F. G., & Ferrera, M. (1996). Home ownership and the welfare state: Is southern Europe different? South European Society and Politics, 1(2), 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cliquet, R. L. (1991). The second demographic transition: Fact or fiction?”. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  18. Coleman, D. (2004). Why we don’t have to believe without doubting in the “Second demographic transition” – Some agnostic comments. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2004, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooke, L. P. (2003). The South revisited: The division of labor and family outcomes in Italy and Spain (IRISS Working Paper Series, no. 2003–12). Luxembourg: CEPS/Instead.Google Scholar
  20. Corijn, M., & Klijzing, E. (2001). Transitions to adulthood in Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. DiPrete, T. A., De Graaf, P. M., Luijkx, R., Tåhlin, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1997). Collectivist versus individualist mobility regimes? Structural changes and job mobility in four countries. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 318–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R. (1976). The conflict between aspirations and resources. Population and Development Review, 2(3), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth: What do we really know? The Economic Journal, 108, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elster, J. (1989). Solomonic judgements – Studies in the limitations of rationality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.). (1993). Changing classes: Stratification and mobility in post-industrial societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Esser, H. (1991). Alltagshandeln und Verstehen. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  28. Fligstein, N. (1998). Is globalization the cause of the crises of welfare states? (European University Institute Working Paper SPS No. 98/5). San Domenico, Italy.Google Scholar
  29. Gallie, D. (Ed.). (2004). Resisting marginalization. Unemployment experience and social policy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gallie, D., White, M., Cheng, Y., & Tomlinson, M. (1998). Restructuring the employment relationship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Guillén, M. (2001). Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heiner, R. A. (1983). The origin of predictable behavior. The American Economic Review, 73, 560–595.Google Scholar
  34. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (Eds.). (1999). Global transformations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jameson, F., & Miyoshi, M. (Eds.). (1998). The cultures of globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kreyenfeld, M., & Hank, K. (2000). Does the availability of child care influence the employment of mothers? Findings from western Germany. Journal Population Research and Policy Review, 19(4), 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuijsten, A. C. (1996). Changing family patterns in Europe: A case of divergence? European Journal of Population, 12(2), 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  40. Lesthaeghe, R., & Meekers, D. (1986). Value changes and the dimensions of familism in the European community. European Journal of Population, 2(3/4), 225–268.Google Scholar
  41. Lesthaeghe, R., & van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In D. J. van de Kaa & R. Lesthaeghe (Eds.), Bevolking: groei en krimp (pp. 9–24). Deventer: Van Loghum Slateru.Google Scholar
  42. Liefbroer, A. (1991). The choice between a married or unmarried first union by young adults: A competing risks analysis. European Journal of Population, 7, 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liefbroer, A. C. (2005). The impact of perceived costs and rewards of childbearing on entry into parenthood: Evidence from a panel study. European Journal of Population, 21(4), 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liefbroer, A. C., & Fokkema, T. (2008). Recent developments in demographically relevant attitudes and behaviour: New challenges for a new era? In J. Surkyn, P. Deboosere, & J. van Bavel (Eds.), Demographic challenges for the 21st century. A state of art in demography (pp. 115–141). Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
  45. Lindenberg, S. (1983). Utility and morality, Kyklos, 36, 450-468.Google Scholar
  46. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  47. Mason, K., & Oppenheim, K. (1997). Gender and demographic change: What do we know? In G. W. Jones et al. (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition (pp. 158–182). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  48. Maurice, M., & Sellier, F. (1979). A societal analysis of industrial relations: A comparison between France and West Germany. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 17, 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mayer, K. U. (2004). Whose lives? How history, societies, and institutions define and shape life courses. Research in Human Development, 1(3), 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Micheli, G. (2004). On the verge of familistic interpretation. Familism, moods and other alchemies. In G. Dalla Zuanna & G. Micheli (Eds.), Strong family and low fertility: A paradox?” European studies of population (Vol. 14, pp. 127–160). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mills, M. (2004). Stability and change: The structuration of partnership histories in Canada, the Netherlands and the Russian federation. European Journal of Population, 20(1), 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mills, M. (2007). Individualization and the life course: Towards a theoretical model and empirical evidence. In C. Howard (Ed.), Individualization (pp. 61–79). Toronto: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  55. Mills, M. (2009). Globalization and inequality. European Sociological Review, 25(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mills, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course: A theoretical framework. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 1–24). London/New York: Routledge Advances in Sociology Series.Google Scholar
  57. Mills, M., Blossfeld, H.-P., & Klijzing, E. (2005). Becoming an adult in uncertain times: A 14-Country comparison of the losers of globalization. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (Routledge Advances in Sociology Series, pp. 393–411). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Mills, M., Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M. L., & Begall, K. (2008a). Asymmetric gender role-sets and fertility intentions: A comparative analysis of Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mills, M., Blossfeld, H.-P., Buchholz, S., Hofäcker, D., Bernardi, F., & Hofmeister, H. (2008b). Converging divergences? An international comparison of the impact of globalization on industrial relations and employment careers. International Sociology, 23(4), 561–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Montanari, I. (2001). Modernization, globalization and the welfare state: A comparative analysis of old and new convergence of social insurance since 1930. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(3), 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nazio, T., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2003). The Diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population, 19, 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young Men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.Google Scholar
  64. Oppenheimer, V. K., Kalmijn, M., & Lim, N. (1997). Men’s Career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography, 3, 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Piore, M. J. (1969). On-the-job training in the dual labor market: Public and private responsibilities in on-the-job training of disadvantaged workers. In A. R. Weber, G. H. Cassel, & W. L. Ginsburg (Eds.), Public-private manpower politics (pp. 101–132). Madison: Industrial Relations Research Association Series.Google Scholar
  66. Pongrácz, M., & Spéder, Z. (2008). Attitudes towards forms of partnership. In Ch Höhn, D. Avramov, & I. Kotowska (Eds.), People, population change and policies: Lessons from the population policy acceptance study (Vol. 1, pp. 93–112). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Raab, M., Ruland, M., Schönberger, B., Blossfeld, H.-P., Hofäcker, D., Buchholz, S., & Schmelzer, P. (2008). GlobalIndex – A sociological approach to globalization measurement. International Sociology, 24(4), 596–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Regini, M. (2000). Between deregulation and social pacts: The responses of European economies to globalization. Politics and Society, 28(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reher, S. D. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rindfuss, R., & Vandenheuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16(4), 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schulze, G. G., & Ursprung, H. W. (1999). Globalization of the economy and the nation state. The World Economy, 22, 295–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shavit, Y., & Müller, W. (1998). From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  73. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sobotka, T. (2003). Re-emerging diversity: Rapid fertility changes in Central and Eastern Europe after the collapse of the communist regimes. Population-E, 58(4–5), 451–486.Google Scholar
  75. Sobotka, T. (2008). The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe. Demographic Research, 19(8), 171–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sørensen, A. B. (1983). The structure of allocation to open and closed positions in social structure. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 12, 203–224.Google Scholar
  77. Soskice, D. (1998). Divergent production regimes: Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s. In H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks, & J. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism (pp. 101–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Standing, G. (1997). Globalization, labor flexibility and insecurity: The era of market regulation. The European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1, 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Streeck, A. (1987). The uncertainties of management in the management of uncertainties: Employees, labor relations and industrial adjustment in the 1980s. Work Employment and Society, 1, 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Useem, M. (1996). Investor capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  81. van Bavel, J. (2007, November 18). Subreplacement fertility in the west before the baby boom (1900–1940). Current and contemporary perspectives. Paper presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the Social Science History Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  82. van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.Google Scholar
  83. van de Kaa, D. J. (1996). Anchored narratives: The story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility. Population Studies, 50(3), 389–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Fakultät Sozial- und WirtschaftswissenschaftenOtto-Friedrich-Universität BambergBambergGermany

Personalised recommendations