Homosoil, a Methodology for Quantitative Extrapolation of Soil Information Across the Globe

  • B.P. Mallavan
  • B. Minasny
  • A.B. McBratneyEmail author
Part of the Progress in Soil Science book series (PROSOIL, volume 2)


In many places in the world, soil information is difficult to obtain and can be non-existent. When no detailed map or soil observation is available in a region of interest, we have to extrapolate from other parts of the world. This chapter will discuss the Homosoil method, which assumes homology of soil-forming factors between a reference area and the region of interest. This includes: climate, physiography, and parent materials. The approach will involve seeking the smallest taxonomic distance of the scorpan factors between the region of interest and other reference areas (with soil data) in the world. Using the digital information of soil climate from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) (solar radiation, rainfall, temperature, and evapo-transpiration), topography from the HYDRO1k (elevation, slope, and compound topographic index), and lithology of the world on a 0.5°× 0.5° grid, we calculated Gower’s similarity index between an area of interest and the rest of the world. The rules calibrated in the reference area can be applied in the region of interest realising its limitations and extrapolation consequences.


Global soil mapping Homoclime Climate Map extrapolation Soil forming factors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, J.M., 1997. Global land environments since the last interglacial. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA,
  2. Booth, T.H., Nix, H.A., Hutchinson, M.F., and Busby, J.R., 1987. Grid matching: a new method for homoclime analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 39:241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bui, E.N., Henderson, B.L., and Viergever, K., 2006. Knowledge discovery from models of soil properties developed through data mining. Ecological Modelling 191:431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bui, E.N. Moran, C.J., 2001. Disaggregation of polygons of surficial geology and soil maps using spatial modelling and legacy data. Geoderma 103:79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Durr, H.H., Meybeck, M., and Durr, S.H., 2005. Lithologic composition of the Earth’s continental surfaces derived from a new digital map emphasizing riverine material transfer. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 19, GB4S10.Google Scholar
  6. Gower, J.C., 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartemink, A.E., 2008. Soil map density and a nation’s wealth and income. In: Hartemink, A.E., McBratney, A.B., and Mendonca-Santos, M.L. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping with Limited Data. Springer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenny, H., 1941. Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, P.G., Diaz, W., and Cock, J.H., 2005. Homologue, a computer system for identifying similar environments throughout the tropical world, version Beta a.0. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
  10. McBratney, A.B., Mendonça Santos, M.L., and Minasny, B., 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McKenzie, N.J., Jacquier, D.W., Maschmedt, D.J., Griffin, E.A., and Brough, D.M., 2005. ASRIS Australian Soil Resource Information System. Technical specifications. Version 1.5. October 2005. Australian Collaborative Evaluation Program.Google Scholar
  12. Mourier, B., Walter, C., Merot, P., 2008. Soil distribution in valleys according to stream order. Catena 72:395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. New, M., Hulme, M., and Jones, P.D., 1999. Representing twentieth century space-time climate variability. Part 1: Development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. Journal of Climate 12:829–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prescott, J.A., 1938. The climate of tropical Australia in relation to possible agricultural occupation. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 62:229–240.Google Scholar
  15. Prescott, J.A., 1943. The Australian homoclime of the zone of natural occurrence of Parthenium argentatum. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 67:312–318.Google Scholar
  16. Russell, J.S., and Moore, A.W., 1970. Detection of homoclimates by numerical analysis with reference to the brigalow region (eastern Australia). Agricultural Meteorology 7:455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schenk, H.H., and Jackson, R.B., 2005. Mapping the global distribution of deep roots in relation to climate and soil characteristics. Geoderma 126:129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schultz, J., 2005. The Ecozones of the World: the Ecological Divisions of the Geosphere. Springer-Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  19. Tranter, G., McBratney, A.B., and Minasny, B., 2009. Using distance metrics to determine the appropriate domain of pedotransfer function predictions. Geoderma 149:421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zinck, J.A., 1990. Soil Survey: Epistemology of a Vital Discipline. ITC, Enschede, the Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Montpellier SupAgroMontpellier Cedex 01France
  2. 2.Food & Natural ResourcesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations