Advertisement

Dynamic Changes in Optical Properties

  • Jennifer K. BartonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Most biological tissues are highly scattering, and, at resonant wavelengths, have strong absorption from chromophores such as oxyhemoglobin and water. Optical properties of tissue can vary considerably with time, due to actions that are either deliberate (e.g. application of “optical clearing” agents) or unintentional (e.g. dehydration of ex vivo tissue samples). During photothermal therapy, dramatic shifts in optical properties can occur due to high temperatures and reversible or irreversible biochemical reactions. An understanding of dynamic tissue optical properties is important for at least three reasons: (1) implementing tissue handling protocols that assure repeatable optical property measurements, (2) developing mathematical models that accurately predict therapeutic outcomes, and (3) manipulating tissue optical properties to enhance diagnostic information or therapeutic efficacy.

Keywords

Optical Coherence Tomography Bathochromic Shift Thermal Lens Evaporative Water Loss Photothermal Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Collins JR. Change in the infrared absorption spectrum of water with temperature. Phys Rev., 26:771–779 (1925).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hale GM, Querry, MR, Rusk AN, and Williams D. Influence of temperature on the spectrum of water. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 62:1103–1108 (1972).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walsh JT Jr and Cummings JP. Effect of the dynamic optical properties of water on midinfrared laser ablation. Lasers Surg. Med., 15:295–305 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cordone L, Cupane A, Leone M, and Vitrano E. Optical absorption spectra of deoxy- and oxyhemoglobin in the temperature range 300–320 K. Biophys. Chem., 24:259–275 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    San Biagio, PL, Vitrano E, Cupane A, Madonia F, and Palma MU. Temperature induced difference spectra of oxy and deoxy hemoglobin in the near-IR, visible and Soret regions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 77:1158–1165 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinke JM and Shepherd AP. Effects of temperature on optical absorbance spectra of oxy-, carboxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin. Clin. Chem., 38:1360–1364 (1992).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sfareni R, Boffi A, Quaresima V, and Ferrari M. Near infrared absorption spectra of human deoxy- and oxyhaemoglobin in the temperature range 20–40 degrees C. Biochim Biophys Acta., 1340(2):165–169 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray K and Slade EF. The temperature dependence of the optical absorption spectra of some methaemoglobin derivatives. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 48:1019–24 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jansen ED, van Leeuwen TG, Motamedi M, Borst C, and Welch AJ. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient of water for midinfrared laser radiation. Lasers Surg. Med., 14:258–68 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schomacker KT, Domankevitz Y, Flotte TJ, and Deutsch TF. Co:MgF2 laser ablation of tissue: Effect of wavelength on ablation threshold and thermal damage. Lasers Surg. Med., 11:141–151 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lange BI, Brendel T, and Huttmann G. Temperature dependence of light absorption in water at holmium and thulium laser wavelengths. Appl. Opt., 41:5797–803 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Black JF, Wade N, and Barton JK. Mechanistic comparison of blood undergoing laser photocoagulation at 532 and 1,064 nm. Lasers Surg. Med., 36:155–165 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verkryusse W, Nilsson AMK, Milner TE, Beek JF, Lucassen GW, and van Gemert MJC. Optical absorption of blood depends on temperature during a 0.5 ms laser pulse at 586 nm. Photochem. Photobiol., 67:276–281 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Black JF and Barton JK. Chemical and structural changes in blood undergoing laser photocoagulation. Photochem. Photobiol., 80:89–97 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zijlstra WG, Buursma A, and van Assendelft OW. Visible and near infrared absorption spectra of human and animal haemoglobin. VSP, Utrecht (2000).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kienle A and Hibst R. A new optimal wavelength for treatment of port wine stains? Phys. Med. Biol., 40:1559–1576 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Gemert, MJC, Welch AJ, Pickering JW, Tan OT, and Gijsbers GHM. Wavelengths for laser treatment of port wine stains and telangiectasia. Lasers Surg. Med., 16:147–155 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gordon JP, Leite CC, Moore RS, Porto PS, and Whinnery JR. Long-transient effects in lasers with inserted liquid samples. J. Appl. Phys., 36:3–8 (1965).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Venkatesh S, Guthrie S, Cruickshank FR, Bailey R, Foulds W, and Lee WR. Thermal lens measurements in the cornea. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 69:92–95 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fankhauser F, Roussel P, Steffen J, Van der Zypen E, and Chrenkova A. Clinical studies on the efficiency of high power laser radiation upon some structures of the anterior segment of the eye. Int. Ophthalmol. 3:129 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ith M, Frenz M, and Weber HP. Scattering and thermal lensing of 2.12-μm laser radiation in biological tissue. Appl. Opt., 40:2216–2223 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Motamedi M, Welch AJ, Cheong W, Ghaffari SA, and Tan OT. Thermal lensing in biologic medium. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 24:693–696 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Affonce DA and Fowler AJ. The effect of thermal lensing during selective Photothermolysis. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 73:473–479 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vincelette RL, Thomas RJ, Rockwell BA, Lund DJ, and Welch AJ. Thermal lensing in ocular media exposed to continuous-wave near-infrared radiation: 1150–1350 nm region. J. Bioimed Opt., 13:054005 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halldorsson, T. Alteration of optical and thermal properties of blood by Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Proceedings of the 4th congress of the international society for laser surgery, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 23–27 (1981).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barton JK, Frangineas G, Pummer H, and Black JF. Cooperative phenomena in two-pulse, two-color laser photocoagulation of cutaneous blood vessels. Photochem. Photobiol., 73:642–50 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barton JK, Popok D, and Black JF. Thermal analysis of blood undergoing laser photocoagulation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 7:936–943 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Randeberg LL, Bonesronning JH, Dalaker M, Nelson JS, and Svaasand LO. Methemoglobin formation during laser induced photothermolysis of vascular skin lesions. Lasers Surg. Med., 34:414–419 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ross EV and Domankevitz Y. Laser leg vein treatments: A brief overview. J. Cosmetic Laser Ther., 5:192–197 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tanghetti EA, Sherr EA, and Alvarado SL. Multipass treatment of photodamage using the pulse dye laser. Derm. Surg., 29:686–691 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rohrer TE, Chatrath V, and Iyengar V. Does pulse stacking improve the results of treatment with variable-pulse pulsed-dye lasers? Derm. Surg., 30:163–167 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mordon S and Brisot D, Fournier N. Using a “non uniform pulse sequence” can improve selective coagulation with a Nd:YAG laser (1.06 micron) thanks to Met-hemoglobin absorption: A clinical study on blue leg veins. Lasers Surg. Med., 32:160–170 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang MU, Yaroslavsky AN, Farinelli WA, Tsao SS, and Anderson RR. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser treatment for port wine stains. J. Amer. Acad. Derm., 52(3):480–490 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zanelli G and Narurkar VA. Full thickness scars from long pulsed 1064 nm lasers. Lasers Surg. Med., S16, 80:28 (2004).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kimel S, Choi B, Svaasand LO, Lotfi J, Viator JA, and Nelson JS. Influence of laser wavelength and pulse duration on gas bubble formation in blood filled glass capillaries. Lasers Surg. Med., 36:281–288 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pikkula BM, Chang DW, Nelson JS, and Anvari B. Comparison of 585 and 595 nm laser-induced vascular response of normal in vivo human skin. Lasers Surg. Med., 36:117–123 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jia W, Choi B, Franco W, Lotfi J, Majaron B, Aguilar G, and Nelson JS. Treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions using multiple-intermittent cryogen spurts and two-wavelength laser pulses: Numerical and animal studies. Lasers Surg. Med., 39:494–503 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cilesiz IF and Welch AJ. Light dosimetry: Effects of dehydration and thermal damage on the optical properties of the human aorta. App. Opt., 32:477–487 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jerath MR, Gardner CM, Rylander HG 3rd, and Welch AJ. Dynamic optical property changes: Implications for reflectance feedback control of photocoagulation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 16:113–126 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jerath MR, Chundru R, Barrett SF, Rylander HG 3rd, and Welch AJ. Preliminary results on reflectance feedback control of photocoagulation in vivo. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 41:201–203(1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cilesiz I, Thomsen S, and Welch AJ. Controlled temperature tissue fusion: Argon laser welding of rat intestine in vivo, part one. Lasers Surg. Med., 21:269–277 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Simhon D, Ravid A, Halpern M, Cilesiz I, Brosh T, Kariv N, Leviav A, and Katzir A. Laser soldering of rat skin, using fiberoptic temperature controlled system. Lasers Surg. Med. 29(3):265–273 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nilsson AMK, Lucassen GW, Verkryusse W, Andersson-Engels S, and van Gemert MJC. Changes in optical properties of human whole blood in vitro due to slow heating. Photochem. Photobiol., 65:366–373 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kim B, Jacques SL, Rastegar S, Thompsen S, and Motamedi M. Nonlinear finite-element analysis of the role of dynamic changes in blood perfusion and optical properties in laser coagulation of tissue. IEEE Sel. Top. Quantum. Electron., 2:922–933 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    London RA, Flinsky ME, Zimmerman GB, Bailey DS, Eder DC, and Jacques SL. Laser-tissue interaction modeling with LATIS. Appl. Opt., 36:9068–9074 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Whelan WM and Wyman DR. Dynamic modeling of interstitial laser photocoagulation: Implications for lesion formation in liver in vivo. Lasers Surg. Med. 24:202–208 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jiang SC and Zhang XX. Effects of dynamic changes of tissue properties during laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT). Lasers Med. Sci., 19:197–202 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhu D, Luo Q, Zhu G, and Liu W. Kinetic thermal response and damage in laser coagulation of tissue. Lasers Surg. Med., 31:313–321 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Iizuka MN, Vitkin IA, Kolios MC, and Sherar MD. The effects of dynamic optical properties during interstitial laser photocoagulation. Phys. Med. Biol., 45:1335–1357 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wacker FK, Reither K, Ritz JP, Roggan A, Germer CT, and Wolf KJ. MR-guided interstitial laser-induced thermotherapy of hepatic metastasis combined with arterial blood flow reduction: Technique and first clinical results in an open MR system. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging., 13:31–36 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wohlgemuth WA, Wamser G, Reiss T, Wagner T, and Bohndorf K. In vivo laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy of pig liver with a temperature-controlled diode laser and MRI correlation. Lasers Surg. Med., 29:374–378 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Giorgio A, Tarantino L, de Stefano G , Farella N, Catalano O, Cusati B, Del Viscovo L, Alaia A, and Caturelli E. Interstitial laser photocoagulation under ultrasound guidance of liver tumors: Results in 104 treated patients. Eur J. Ultrasound., 11:181–188 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhu D, Luo Q, and Cen J. Effects of dehydration on the optical properties of in vitro porcine liver. Lasers Surg. Med., 33:226–231 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rylander CG, Stumpp OF, Milner TE, Kemp NJ, Mendenhall JM, Diller KR, and Welch AJ. Dehydration mechanism of optical clearing in tissue. J. Biomed. Opt., 11(4):041117 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fischbarg J and Maurice DM. An update on corneal hydration control. Experimental Eye Res., 78:537–541 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hosseini K, Kholodnykh, Petrova I, Esenaliev R, Hendrikse F, and Motamedi M. Monitoring of rabbit cornea response to dehydration stress by optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 45:2555–2562 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sivak MV Jr, Kobayashi K, Izatt JA, Rollins AM, Ung-Runyawee R, Chak A, Wong RC, Isenberg GA, and Willis J. High-resolution endoscopic imaging of the GI tract using optical coherence tomography. Gastrointest. Endosc., 51:474–479 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chan EK, Sorg B, Protsendo D, O’Neil M, Motamedi M, and Welch AJ. Effects of compression on soft tissue optical properties. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum. Electron., 2:943–950 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jiang S, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD, Kogel C, and Poplack SP. In vivo near-infrared spectral detection of pressure-induced changes in breast tissue. Opt. Lett., 28:1212–1214 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Childers MA, Franco W, Nelson JS, and Aguilar G. Laser surgery of port wine stains using local vacuum pressure: Changes in skin morphology and optical properties (part I). Lasers Surg. Med., 39:108–117 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jansen ED, Asshauer T, Frenz M, Motamedi M, Delacretaz G, and Welch AJ, Effect of pulse duration on bubble formation and laser-induced pressure waves during holmium laser ablation. Lasers Surg. Med., 18:278–293 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wesendahl T, Janknecht P, Ott B, and Frenz M. Erbium:YAG laser ablation of retinal tissue under perfluorodecaline: Determination of laser–tissue interaction in pig eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41:505–512 (2000).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mackanos MA, Jansen ED, Shaw BL, Sanghera JS, Aggarwal I, and Katzir A, Delivery of midinfrared (6 to 7-microm) laser radiation in a liquid environment using infrared-transmitting optical fibers. J. Biomed. Opt., 4:583–593 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chance B, Liu H, Kitai T, and Zhang Y. Effects of solutes on optical properties of biological materials: Models, cells, and tissues. Anal. Biochem., 227:351–362 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Liu H, Beauvoit B, Kimura M, and Chance B. Dependence of tissue optical properties on solute-induced changes in refractive index and osmolarity. J. Biomed. Opt., 1:200–211 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tuchin VV, Xu X, and Wang RK. Dynamic optical coherence tomography in studies of optical clearing, sedimentation, and aggregation of immersed blood. Appl. Opt., 41:258–271 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wang X, Milner TE, Change MC, and Nelson JS. Group refractive index measurement of dry and hydrated type I collagen films using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J. Biomed. Opt., 1:212–216 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Vitkin IJW, Wilson B, and Anderson RR. Optical and thermal characterization of natural melanin. Photochem. Photobiol., 59:455–462 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bolin FP, Preuss LE, Taylor RC, and Ference RJ. Refractive index of some mammalian tissues using a fiber optic cladding method. Appl. Opt., 28:2297–2302 (1989).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tuchin VV, Maksimova IL, Zimnyakov DA, Kon IL, Mavlutov AH, and Mishin AA. Light propagation in tissues with controlled optical properties, J. Biomed. Opt., 2:401–417 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vargas G, Chan EK, Barton JK, Rylander HG, and Welch AJ. Use of an agent to reduce scattering in skin. Lasers Surg. Med., 24:133–141 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Xu X and Wang RK. The role of water desorption on optical clearing biotissue: Studied with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Med. Phys., 30:1246–1253 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Choi B, Tsu L, Ishak TS, Iskandar SM, Chess S, and Nelson JS. Determination of chemical agent optical clearing potential using in vitro human skin. Lasers Surg. Med., 36:72–75(2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yeh AT, Choi B, Nelson JS, and Tromberg BJ. Reversible dissociation of collagen in tissues. J. Invest. Derm., 121:1332–1335 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yeh AT and Hirshburg J. Molecular interactions of exogenous chemical agents with collagen – implications for tissue optical clearing. J. Biomed. Opt., 11:014003 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hirshburg J, Choi B, Nelson JS, and Yeh AT. Collagen solubility correlates with skin optical clearing. J. Biomed. Opt., 11:040501 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hirshburg J, Choi B, Nelson JS, and Yeh A. Correlation between collagen solubility and skin optical clearing using sugars. Lasers Surg. Med., 39:140–144 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Xu X and Wang RK. Synergistic effect of hyperosmotic agents of dimethyl sulfoxide and glycerol on optical clearing of gastric tissue studied with near infrared spectroscopy. Phys. Med. Biol., 49:457–468 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jiang J and Wang RK. Comparing the synergistic effects of oleic acid and dimethyl sulfoxide as vehicles for optical clearing of skin tissue in vitro. Phys. Med. Biol., 49:5283–5294 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Stumpp O, Welch AJ, Gill HS, and Prausnitz MR. OCT analysis of microneedle and Er:YAG surface ablation for enhanced transepidermal delivery of hyper-osmotic agents for optical skin clearing. Proc. SPIE, 5319:121–129 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Stumpp O, Welch AJ, Milner TE, and Neev J. Enhancement of transepidermal skin clearing agent delivery using a 980 nm diode laser. Lasers Surg. Med., 37:278–285 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Tuchin VV, Altshuler GB, Gavrilova AA, Pravdin AB, Tabatadze D, Childs J, and Yaroslavsky IV. Optical clearing of skin using flash lamp-induced enhancement of epidermal permeability. Lasers Surg. Med., 38:824–836 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Stumpp O, Chen B, and Welch AJ. Using sandpaper for noninvasive transepidermal optical skin clearing agent delivery. J Biomed. Opt., 11:041118 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    McNichols RJ, Fox MA, Gowda A, Tuya S, Bell B, and Motamedi M. Temporary dermal scatter reduction: Quantitative assessment and implications for improved laser tattoo removal. Lasers Surg. Med., 36:289–296 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Vargas G, Chan KF, Thomsen SL, and Welch AJ. Use of somatically active agents to alter optical properties of tissue: Effects on the detected fluorescence signal measured through skin. Lasers Surg. Med., 29:213–220 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    He Y and Wang RK. Improvement of low-level light imaging performance using optical clearing method. Biosens. Bioelectron., 20:460–467 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jansen ED, Pickett PM, Machanos MA, and Virostko J. Effect of optical tissue clearing on spatial resolution and sensitivity of bioluminescence imaging. J. Biomed. Opt., 11:021119 (2006).Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Plotnikov S, Juneja V, Isaacson, Mohler WA, and Campahnola PJ. Optical clearing for improved contrast in second harmonic generation imaging of skeletal muscle. Biophys J., 90:328–339 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wang RK, Xu X, Tuchin VV, and Elder JB. Concurrent enhancement of imaging depth and contrast for optical coherence tomography by hyperosmotic agents, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 18:948–953 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    He Y and Wang RK. Dynamic optical clearing effect of tissue impregnated with hyperosmotic agents and studied with optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt., 9:200–206 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Khan MH, Chess S, Choi B, Kelly KM, and Nelson JS. Can topically applied optical clearing agents increase the epidermal damage threshold and enhance therapeutic efficacy? Lasers Surg. Med., 35:93–95 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Vargas G, Barton JK, and Welch AJ. The use of hyper-osmotic chemical agent to improve the laser treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions. J. Biomed. Opt., 13:021114 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Vargas G, Redinger A, Dozier SS, and Welch AJ. Morphological changes in blood vessels produced by hyperosmotic agents and measured by optical coherence tomography. Photochem. Photobiol., 77:541–549 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Tuchin VV, Xu X, and Wang RK. Dynamic optical coherence tomography in studies of optical clearing, sedimentation, and aggregation of immersed blood. Appl. Opt., 41:258–271 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Xu X, Wang RK, Elder JB, and Tuchin VV. Effect of dextran-induced changes and aggregation on optical properties of whole blood. Phys. Med. Biol., 48:1205–1221 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Cheng H, Luo Q, Zeng S, Chen S, Luo W, and Gong H. Hyperosmostic chemical agent’s effect on in vivo cerebral blood flow revealed by laser speckle. Appl. Opt., 43:5772–5777 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations