Advertisement

“Opting Out”: A Case Study of Smallholder Rejection of Research in Western Kenya

  • Michael MisikoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Biophysical soil fertility management research, however good the knowledge it generates, has to contend with social processes among smallholders if that research is to help alleviate poverty. This chapter traces the reasons why smallholder farmers in western Kenya “opted out” of the processes of a participatory, community-based soil fertility management research project that was intended to improve their livelihoods. Critical case sampling was used to investigate 16 notable “dissidents” of the action-research processes. In-depth interviews, informal interviews, and participant observation were undertaken among these informants and four focus group discussions were used for follow up and further data collection. Results showed that smallholders’ participation in soil fertility management research was shaped by many factors, including: perceptions of long-term vs. short-term benefits; personalities and the local “politics of research”; contradictory policies or practices of research institutions; and the nature of soil fertility technologies that were being researched. These factors had similar influences across gender and age. This chapter suggests that meaningful researcher–smallholder partnerships can be achieved if policies and practices of collaborating institutions are harmonised and research is objectively guided and reviewed against smallholder objectives.

Keywords

Agricultural research Soil fertility Western Province (Kenya) Participation–“opting out” Smallholders 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the assistance of farmers in western Kenya, the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), the Rockefeller Foundation, Wageningen University and Research Centre, and the TSBF Institute of CIAT. Perceptions documented here were observed among some farmers; this document does not wish to generalise all observations. The author takes full responsibility for any omissions, inaccuracies, and analyses.

References

  1. Abwunza, J. M. (1995). ‘Silika’ – To make our lives shine: Women’s groups in Maragoli. Anthropologica, 37(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bationo, A. (Ed.). (2004). Managing Nutrient cycles to sustain soil fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Nairobi: Academic Science.Google Scholar
  3. Bationo, A., Hartemink, A., Lungu, O., Naimi, M., Okoth, P., Smaling, E., & Thiombiano, L. (2006). African soils: Their productivity and profitability of fertiliser use. Background paper presented at the African Fertiliser Summit, 9–13 June 2006. Abuja, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, R. (1993). Challenging the professions: Frontiers for rural development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, Y. (Ed.). (1968). Man in adaptation: The cultural present (2nd ed.). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  6. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? (p. 247). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  7. Crowley, E. L., & Carter, S. E. (2000). Agrarian change and the changing relationships between toil and soil in Maragoli, Western Kenya (1900–1994). Human Ecology, 28(3), 383–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Defoer, T., Budelman, A., Toulmin, C., & Carter, S. E. (2000). Building common knowledge: Participatory learning and action research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
  9. FAO, IFAD, & WB. (2008). Gender in agriculture sourcebook. Rome/Washington, DC: Food and Agriculture Organisation, International Fund for Agricultural Development/World Bank.Google Scholar
  10. Holmberg, J. (1992). Making development sustainable: Redefining Institutions, Policy and Economics, International Institute for Environment and Development. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  11. Marshall, P. A. (2003). Human subjects protections, institutional review boards, and cultural anthropological research. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(2), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Misiko, M. (2008). An ethnographic exploration of the impacts of HIV/AIDS on soil fertility management among smallholders in Butula, western Kenya. NJAS, 56(3), 167–177.Google Scholar
  13. Misiko, M, P. Tittonell, J.J. Ramisch, P. Richards and K.E. Giller (2008). Integrating new soyabean varieties for soil fertility management in smallholder systems through participatory research: lessons from western Kenya. Agricultural Systems, 97, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Misiko, M. (2007). Participatory analyses of the “Strengthening ‘Folk Ecology’ Project” activities: A report on the January–March 2007 fieldwork. Nairobi: TSBF-CIAT. (mimeo).Google Scholar
  15. Misiko, M. (2001). The potential of community institutions in dissemination and adoption of agricultural technologies in Emuhaya, Kenya. M.A. Thesis, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
  16. Mosse, D. (2001). ‘People’s knowledge’, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 16–35). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  17. Onduru, D., De Jager, A., Gachini, G., & Diop, J. (2001). Exploring new pathways for innovative soil fertility management in Kenya. Managing Africa’s Soils, 25 Google Scholar
  18. Pijnenburg, B. (2004). Keeping it vague: Discourses and practices of participation in rural Mozambique. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  19. Pretty, J. N. (1995). Regenerating agriculture: Policies and practices for sustainability and self-reliance. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  20. Ramisch, J. J., Misiko, M. T., Ekise, I. E., & Mukalama, J. B. (2006). Strengthening ‘folk ecology’: Community-based learning for soil fertility management, western Kenya. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 4(2), 154–168.Google Scholar
  21. Ramisch, J. J. (2010). Experiments as ‘performances’: Interpreting farmers soil fertility management practices in western Kenya. Chapter 15 in M. Goldman, P. Nadasdy, & M. D. Turner (Eds.), Knowing nature, transforming ecologies: Science, power, and practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Republic of Kenya. (1997a). Busia District Development Plan 1997–2001. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  23. Republic of Kenya. (1997b). Vihiga District Development Plan 1997–2001. Nairobi: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  24. Röling, N. (1990). The agricultural research-technology transfer interface: A knowledge systems perspective. In D. Kaimowitz (Ed.), Making the link: Agricultural research and technology transfer in developing countries (pp. 1–42). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  25. Savala, C. E. N., Omare, M. N., & Woomer, P. L. (Eds.). (2003). Organic resource management in Kenya: Perspectives and guidelines. Nairobi: Forum for Organic Resource Management and Agricultural Technologies.Google Scholar
  26. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme (TSBF). (2000). The Biology and fertility of tropical soils: Report of the Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme 1997–1998. Nairobi: TSBF.Google Scholar
  27. Vanlauwe, B., Diels, J., Sanginga, N., & Merckx, R. (Eds.). (2002). Integrated plant nutrient management in sub-Saharan Africa. Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar
  28. Wangila, J., Rommelse, R., & deWolffe, J. (1999). Characterization of households in the pilot project area of western Kenya. Nairobi: ICRAF (mimeo).Google Scholar
  29. Werner, J. (2000). Participatory development of agricultural innovations: Procedures and methods of on-farm research (p. 193). Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning and Innovation SystemsAfrica Rice Centre (WARDA)CotonouBenin

Personalised recommendations