Care Work and Reconnections

Chapter

Abstract

The role of care workers in in-home care has been little explored in terms of their relationship with their clients. Their position in many countries of standing betwixt and between client and agency, of becoming almost like kin, and their own frustrations with lack of autonomy, poor pay and working conditions, puts them also in a liminal stage. The care work relationship tends to be defined in terms of the physical and material tasks performed to support the older person at home, while the less tangible, emotional work tends not to be recognised. We maintain that it is this relationship with frail older people which has the potential to provide support for the reclamation of a preferred identity and the reconnection in the final phase of the rite of passage into a new life stage of supported independence.

Keywords

Home Care Care Recipient Emotional Engagement Emotional Connection Care Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aronson, J., & Neysmith, S. M. (1996). ‘You’re not just in there to do the work’: Depersonalizing policies and the exploitation of home care workers’ labor. Gender and Society, 10(1), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balloch, S., McLean, J., & Fisher, M. (Eds.). (1999). Social services: working under pressure. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartoldus, E., Gillery, B., & Stuges, P. J. (1989). Stress and coping among home-care workers. Health and Social Work, 14, 204–210.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, M. (1991). Vision for the future. Nursing the Elderly, January/February, Vol. 1, 10–12.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, J., Dwyer, M., Lambie, H., & Lynch, J. (1999). Homecare workers: A case study of a female occupation. A research report. Wellington: Ministry of Women’s Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Charmaz, K. (1987). Struggling for a self: Identity levels of the chronically ill. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 6, 283–321.Google Scholar
  7. Cooler, C., Selwood, A., & Livingston, G. (2000). The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect. Age and Ageing, 37(2), 151–160.Google Scholar
  8. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1988). Unending work and care: Managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Denton, M., Zetinoglu, I. U., Webb, S., & Lian, J. (1999). Occupational health issues among employees of home care agencies. Canadian Journal on Ageing, 18(2), 154–181.Google Scholar
  10. Denton, M., Zeytinoglu, I., Davies, S., & Lian, J. (2002). Job stress and job dissatisfaction of home care workers in the context of health care restructuring. International Journal of Health Services, 32(2), 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, T. (1992). Making gray gold: Narratives of nursing home care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Doyle, M., & Timonen, V. (2007). Home care for ageing populations: A comparative analysis of domiciliary care in Denmark, the United States and Germany. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Efraimsson, E., Hoglund, I., & Sandman, P. (2001). The everlasting trial of strength and patience: Transitions in home care nursing as narrated by patients and family member. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10, 813–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eustis, N. N., & Fischer, L. R. (1991). Relationships between home care clients and their workers: Implications for the quality of care. The Gerontologist, 31(4), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eustis, N. N., Fischer, L. R., & Kane, R. A. (1994). The homecare worker: On the frontline of quality. Generations, 18(3): 43–49.Google Scholar
  16. Feldman, P. H., Saienza, A., & Kane, N. M. (1990). Who cares for them: Workers in the home care industry. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  17. Francis, J., & Netten, A. (2004). Raising the quality of home care: A study of service users’ views. Social Policy and Administration, 38(3), 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godfrey, M., & Townsend, J. (2008). Older people in transition from illness to health: Trajectories of recovery. Qualitative Health Research, 8 (7), 939–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hale, B. (2006). The meaning of home as it becomes a place for care: A study in the dynamics of home care for older people. A thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D., University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  20. Hochschild, A. (1995). The politics of culture: Traditional, cold modern, and warm modern ideals of care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 2, 331–346.Google Scholar
  21. Hugo, G. (2007). Contextualising the ‘crisis in aged care’ in Australia: A demographic perspective. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 169–182.Google Scholar
  22. Karner, T. X. (1998). Professional caring: Homecare workers as fictive kin. Journal of Aging Studies, 12(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kellaher, L. (2002). Commentary 1. In K. Sumner (Ed.), Our homes, our lives: Choices in later life living arrangements (pp. 26–29). London: Centre for Policy on Ageing.Google Scholar
  24. Lachs, M., & Pillemer, K. (2004). Elder abuse. The Lancet, 364(9441), 1263–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maloney, S. (2005). Improving the quality of work for women in the home care, residential and cleaning sectors: Overview. Report to Central DHBS, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  26. New Zealand Department of Labour. (2009). Workforce 2020: The future demand for paid caregivers in a rapidly ageing society. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Labour.Google Scholar
  27. OECD. (2009). The long-term care workforce: Overview and strategies to adapt supply to a growing demand. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. Parks, J. A. (2003). No place like home. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Paterson, B., Thorne, S., Crawford, J., & Tarko, M. (1999). Living with diabetes as a transformational experience, Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rostgaard, T. (2004). With due care: Social care for the young and the old across Europe. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  31. Schmid, H., & Hasenfeld, Y. (1993). Organizational dilemmas in the provision of home-care services. Social Service Review, 67(1), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stone, D. (2005). For love nor money: The commodification of care. In M. Ertman & J. Williams (Eds.), Rethinking commodification: Cases and readings in law and culture (pp. 271–290). New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  33. Szebehely, M. (1995). The organization of everyday life: On home helpers and elderly people in Sweden. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  34. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  35. Twigg, J. (2000). The body and community care. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ungerson, C. (1990). The language of care: And caring. Work and welfare in Britain and Scandinavia. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  37. Ungerson, C. (2005). Care, work and feeling. Sociological Review, 53(2), 188–203.Google Scholar
  38. Waerness, K. (1984). The rationality of caring. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 5, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, S. J. (2000). Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22(1), 40–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willner, M. A. (2000). Towards a stable and experienced caregiving workforce. Generations, 24(Fall), 60–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. Preventive & Social Medicinec/o University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Dept. Political Science &Public PolicyUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  3. 3.Dept. Preventive & Social MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations