Advertisement

How do Socioeconomic Characteristics Interact with Equity and Efficiency Considerations? An Analysis of Hurricane Disaster Relief Goods Provision

  • Mark W. Horner
  • Michael J. Widener
Chapter
Part of the GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL, volume 99)

Abstract

Spatial analytic research has explored the issue of where to best site hurricane relief distribution facilities, but it has largely concentrated on the efficient provision of these services. However, equity considerations may also impact decisions on where to locate facilities. Questions of efficiency vs. equity become all the more acute when more detailed assessments of peoples’ socioeconomic characteristics are made as a part of these decisions. This paper examines the issue of siting hurricane disaster relief facilities based on equity vs. efficiency objectives, in light of populations’ socioeconomic differences. Population differences are measured in terms of a household income variable. p-median and vertex p-center problems are applied to find relief center locations in a Southeastern U.S. city. Results show that income differences interact with the location strategies employed to produce variation in people’s accessibility to relief goods.

Keywords

Hurricanes Distaster relief Spatial model GIS Equity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. (BCS-0550330) awarded to the first author (Horner). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Altay, N. & Green, W.G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, E.J. (1991). Hurricane evacuation behavior. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9(2), 287–310Google Scholar
  3. Cervero, R. & Duncan, M. (2006). Which reduces vehicle travel more: jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng, T.C.E., Kang, L. & Ng, C.T. (2007). An improved algorithm for the p-center problem on interval graphs with unit lengths. Computers & Operations Research, 34(8), 2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cutter, S.L., Emrich, C.T., Mitchell, J.T., Boruff, B.J., Gall, M., Schmidtlein, M.C., Burton, C.G. & Melton, G. (2006). The long road home: Race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment, 48(2), 8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daskin, M.S. (1995). Network and discrete location: models, algorithms, and applications. (New York: John Wiley and Sons)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daskin, M.S. (2008). What you should know about location modeling. Naval Research Logistics, 55(4), 283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeVerteuil, G. (2000). Reconsidering the legacy of urban public facility location theory in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 24(1), 47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drezner, T. (2004). Location of casualty collection points. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 22(6), 899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elsner, J.B. & Jagger, T.H. (2006). Comparison of hindcasts anticipating the 2004 Florida Hurricane season. Weather and Forecasting, 21(2), 182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM). (2004). Florida Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. Available on http://floridadisaster.org/documents/CEMP/floridaCEMP.htm.
  12. Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM). (2006). Florida Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan County Logistics Planning Standard - Operating Guideline (CEMP 2355). Available on http://floridadisaster.org/bpr/Response/CIandLOG.htm
  13. Fothergill, A., Maestas, E.G.M. & Darlington, J.D. (1999). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2), 156–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu, H. Q. & Wilmot, C.G. (2006). Survival analysis-based dynamic travel demand models for hurricane evacuation. Transportation Research Record, 1964, 211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harsanyi, J.C. (1975). Can maximin principle serve as a basis for morality – critique of rawls. J Theory. American Political Science Review, 69(2), 594–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horner, M.W. & Downs, J.A. (2007). Testing a flexible GIS-based network flow model for routing hurricane disaster relief goods. Transportation Research Record, 2022, 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horner, M.W. & Downs, J.A. (2008a). An analysis of the effects of socio-economic status on hurricane disaster relief plans. Transportation Research Record, 2067, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horner, M.W. & Downs, J.A. (2008b). Optimizing Hurricane Disaster Relief Goods Distribution and Transportation: Florida Department of Emergency Management Comprehensive Plan. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, at Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. Horner, M. W. & Mefford, J.N. (2005). Examining the spatial and social variation in employment accessibility: a case study of bus transit in austin, texas. In D. Levinson & K. Krizek (Eds.), Access to Destinations (pp. 193–214). (Oxford: Elsevier)Google Scholar
  20. Horner, M. W. & Murray, A.T. (2002). Excess commuting and the modifiable areal unit problem. Urban Studies, 39(1):131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindell, M.K. & Prater, C.S. (2007). Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: Examples from hurricane research and planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development-Asce, 133(1), 18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, S.X. & X. Zhu, A. (2004). Accessibility analyst: an integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning. Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design, 31(1), 105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marsh, M.T. & Schilling, D.A. (1994). equity measurement in facility location analysis – a review and framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 74(1), 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, H. J. & Shaw, S.-L. (2001). Geographic information systems for transportation. (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  25. Mirchandani, P. B. & Francis, R.L. (1990). Discrete location theory. (New York: John Wiley and Sons)Google Scholar
  26. Morrill, R. L. & Symons, J. (1977). Efficiency and equity aspects of optimum location. Geographical Analysis, 9(3), 215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicholas, M. A., Handy, S. L & Sperling, D. (2004). Using geographic information systems to evaluate siting and networks of hydrogen stations. Transportation Research Record, 1880, 126–134Google Scholar
  28. Oppong, J.R. (1996). Accommodating the rainy season in third world location-allocation applications. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 30(2), 121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Preston, J. & Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(3), 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ReVelle, C., Marks, D. & Liebman, J.C. (1970). Analysis of private and public sector location models. Management Science Series a-Theory, 16(11), 692–707Google Scholar
  31. ReVelle, C.S. & Eiselt, H.A. (2005). Location analysis: a synthesis and survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(1), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ReVelle, C.S. & Swain, R.W. (1970). Central facilities location. Geographical Analysis, 2(1), 30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwanen, T. (2003). Transport planning, logistics, and spatial mismatch: a regional science perspective. Journal of Regional Science, 43(1), 206–209Google Scholar
  34. Scott, D.M. & Horner, M.W. (2008). Examining the role of urban form in shaping people’s accessibility to opportunities: an exploratory analysis. Forthcoming in the Journal of Transportation and Land Use.Google Scholar
  35. Smoyer-Tomic, K.E., Spence, J.C. & Amrhein, C. (2006). Food deserts in the prairies? Supermarket accessibility and neighborhood need in Edmonton, Canada. Professional Geographer, 58(3), 307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Talen, E. & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4), 595–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teitz, M. B. & Bart, P. (1968). Heuristic methods for estimating generalized vertex median of a weighted graph. Operations Research 16(5), 955–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Truelove, M. (1993). Measurement of spatial equity. Environment and Planning C-Government And Policy, 11(1), 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolshon, B. (2006). Evacuation planning and engineering for hurricane katrina. The Bridge, 36(1), 27–34Google Scholar
  40. Wright, P.D., Liberatore, M.J. & Nydick, R.L. (2006). A survey of operations research models and applications in homeland security. Interfaces, 36(6), 514–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations