Educational Inequalities in Greece, Sweden and the United Kingdom: A Comparative Analysis of the Origins

Chapter

Abstract

The analysis of the PISA results indicates that both Greece and the United Kingdom show a degree of inequality in students’ achievement, whereas Sweden demonstrates comparatively high levels of educational equality. Educational inequality can be measured in two ways: standard deviations which give the spread of scores in a given country and the socioeconomic gradient which measures how far social origin effects influence individual achievement. According to results from PISA, the overall variation in student performance is much higher in the United Kingdom and Greece than in Sweden (OECD 2001:253, Table 2.3a) and the relationship between student performance and socioeconomic background is again considerably stronger in the first two countries (OECD 2001:308, Table 8.1).

References

  1. Angelis, L. (2003). The Comprehensive School in England. Myth and Reality. Historical Review of the Educational Politics of England through Sources. Athens: Tipothito Giorgos Dardanos (in Greek).Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bouzakis, S. (2005). Modern Greek Education (1821–1998). Dependent Development. Athens: Gutenberg (in Greek).Google Scholar
  4. Brown, P. and Lauder, H. (1996). Education, Globalisation, and Economic Development. Journal of Education Policy, 11: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charalambis, D., Maratou-Alipranti, L., and Hadjiyanni, A. (eds.). (2004). Recent Social Trends in Greece, 1960–2000. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coldron, J., Tanner, E., Finch, S., Shipton, L., Wolstenholme, C., Willis, B., et al. (2008). Secondary School Admissions. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  7. Esping-Andersen, G. (2004). Unequal Opportunities and the Mechanisms of Social Inheritance. In M. Corak (ed.), Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe (pp. 289–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat (1998). Social Portrait of Europe: September 1998. London: Bernan Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eurydice (2005). Key Data on Education in Europe 2005. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  12. Fenger, H. J. M. (2007). Welfare regimes in central and eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2): 1–30.Google Scholar
  13. Fitz, J., Davies, B., and Evans, J. (2006). Educational Policy and Social Reproduction. Class Inscription and Symbolic Control. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Georgiadis, N. M. (2007). Educational reforms in Greece (1959–1997) and human capital theory. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(2). [WWW page]. URL http://www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=105
  15. Green, A. and Wiborg, S. (2004). Comprehensive Schooling and Educational Inequality: An International Perspective. In M. Benn and C. Chitty (eds.), A Tribute to Caroline Benn: Education and Democracy (pp. 217–242). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Grollios, G. and Kaskaris, I. (2003). From socialist – democratic to “third way” politics and rhetoric in Greek education (1997–2002). Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1(1). [WWW page]. URL http://www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=4
  17. Hallam, S. (2002). Ability Grouping in Schools: A Literature Review. London: University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F., and Ridge, J. M. (1980). Origins and Destinations, Family, Class and Education in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hanushek, E. A. and Wößmann, L. (2006) Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? differences – in – differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116 (March): C63–C76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, D. (1967). Social Relations in a Secondary School. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatcher, R. (2006). Social Class and Schooling: Differentiation or Democracy? In Education, Equality and Human Rights. Issues of Gender, ‘Race’, Sexuality, Disability and Social Class (pp. 202–224). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hattersley, R. (2004). The Case against Selection. In M. Benn, C. Chitty, and T. Benn (Eds.), A Tribute to Caroline Benn: Education and Democracy (pp. 53–58). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, K. (2003). Education in Britain: 1944 to the Present. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Katsikas, C. and Kavvadias, G. (1994). Inequalities in Greek Education. Athens: Gutenberg (in Greek).Google Scholar
  25. Lacey, C. (1970). Hightown Grammar. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Margaret Thatcher Foundation. Speeches, Interviews and Other Statements. (2007). Interview for Woman’s Own. [WWW page]. URL http://www.margaretthatcher.org/speeches/displaydocument.asp?docid=106689
  27. Mill, J. S. (1888). “Two Systems of Comparison.” In A. Etzioni and F. DuBow (eds.) (1970). Comparative Perspectives Theories and Methods (pp. 205–213). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  28. Millar, J., Ridge, T., and Bennett, F. (2006). Part-time Work and Social Security: Increasing the Options. Leeds: Corporate Document Services. [WWW page]. URL http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rports2005-2006/rrep351.pdf Google Scholar
  29. Ministry of Education and Science of Sweden. (2004). Equity in Education. Thematic Review. Country Analytical Report, Sweden. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Science of Sweden.Google Scholar
  30. Ministry of Education and Science of Sweden. (2000). Early Childhood Education and Care Policy in Sweden. Stockhom: Ministry of Education and Science of Sweden.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs. (2007). The Structure of the Education System, Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs. [WWW page]. URL http://www.ypepth.gr/en_ec_page1531.htm
  32. Morris, M. (2004). The Route to my Comprehensive. In M. Benn, C. Chitty, and T. Benn (eds.), A Tribute to Caroline Benn: Education and Democracy (pp. 41–52). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2007). Family Database. [WWW page]. URL http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/26/37864482.pdf
  34. OECD. (2005a). Babies and Bosse – Reconciling Work and Family Life (Vol. 4): Canada, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2005b). School Factors Related to Quality and Equity. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD. (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. OECD. (1995). Reviews of National Policies for Education: Sweden. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Pakos, T. and Paleologou, S.-M. (2003). The Development of Greek Economy: A Political Economy Perspective. In C. Kollias and G. Günlük-Şenesen (eds.), Greece and Turkey in the 21st century: Conflict or Cooperation: a Political Economy Perspective (pp. 51–66). New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. PES Disussion Paper. (2006). Party of European Socialists, Childcare Provision: Contributing to the Achievement of Social Democratic Goals. [WWW page]. URL http://www.pes.org/downloads/Campaign_Childcare_Discussion_Paper.pdf
  40. Plantenga, J. and Siegel, M. (2004). European childcare strategies. Position paper for the conference ‘Childcare in a Changing World’. Paper presented at the European conference on the socio-economic aspects of childcare.Google Scholar
  41. Pong, S.-L., Dronkers, J. and Hampden-Thomspon, G. (2003). Family policies and children’s school achievement in single- versus two-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3): 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Powell, M. and Barrientos, A. (2004). Welfare regimes and the welfare mix. European Journal of Political Research, 43: 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Power, S. and Whitty, G. (1999). New Labour’s education policy: first, second or third way? Journal of Education Policy, 14(5): 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sianou-Kirgiou, E. (2006). Education and Social Inequalities. The Transition from Secondary Education to Tertiary Education (1997–2004). Athens: Metehmio (in Greek).Google Scholar
  45. Simon, B. (1991). Education and Social Order, 1940–1990. London: Laurence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  46. Skolverket (2000). Child Care in Sweden. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  47. The Swedish Presidency, Sweden. (2001). The Swedish Welfare System. [WWW page]. URL http://eu2001.se/static/eng/facts/valfard.asp
  48. Tomlinson, S. (2005). Education in a Post-welfare Society (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tsakloglou, P. and Cholezas, I. (2005). Education and Inequality in Greece. Discussion Paper No. 1582. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  50. United Nations (2006). Human Development Report 2006. Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [WWW page]. URL http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/pdfs/report/HDR06-complete.pdf
  51. Venieris, D. (2003). Social policy in Greece: Rhetoric versus reform. Social Policy and Administration, 37(2): 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vogel, J. (1999). The European ‘welfare mix’: Institutional configuration and distributative outcome in sweden and the European Union. A longitudinal and Comparative Perspective. Social Indicators Research, 48(3): 248–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whitty, G. and Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wiborg, S. (2004). Education and social integration: A comparative study of the comprehensive school system in scandinavia. London Review of Education, 2(2): 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Working Families, Poverty in Work – Making Work Better (2006) [WWW page]. URL https://http://www.workingfamilies.org.uk/asp/main_downloads/POVERTY%20IN%20WORK.pdf
  56. World Bank. (2006). World Development Indicators 2006. Washington DC: World Bank. [WWW page]. URL http://devdata.worldbank.org/wdi2006/contents/index2.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations