Exploring Reform Ideas for Teaching Algebra: Analysis of Videotaped Episodes and of Conversations About Them

Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Teacher Education book series (MTEN, volume 5)

Abstract

This chapter explores the learning experienced by teachers engaged in algebra reform inquiry. The chapter describes two ways of using video episodes in the analysis of learning practices acquired through teaching. First, we perform a comparative analysis of two episodes that involve guided inquiry during whole-group discussion by the same students, taught by the same teacher at a distance of two years. Acquired practices are analyzed by quantifying “initiation–response–evaluation” statements made by the students and the teacher. The analysis sheds light on changes in practices and norms taking place over time. Second, we use the same two video episodes in a qualitative comparative analysis of two groups of teachers reflecting on the video episodes. One group of participants consists of teachers engaged in teaching the same reform algebra curriculum, the second of algebra teachers using traditional methods of teaching algebra in secondary school. The episodes motivated the first group to analyze their own tensions and dilemmas that the newly learned practices introduced. The major attempts of participants of the second group were to “fix” what they perceived to be the reality in ways that coincided with their practices.

Keywords

Class Discussion High School Teacher Qualitative Comparative Analysis Student Answer Algebra Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse. The language of teaching and learning. Heinemann Portsmouth, NH.Google Scholar
  2. Chazan, D., & Ball, D.(1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19, 2–10.Google Scholar
  3. Chazan, D., & M. Schnepp (2002). Methods, goals, beliefs, commitments and manner in teaching: Dialogue against a calculus backdrop. Social Constructivist Teaching, 9, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chazan, D., Callis, S., & Lehman, M. (2008). Embracing reason: Egalitarian ideals and the teaching of high school mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Elikan, S. (1999). Characterization of computers’ supported inquiry discussions in mathematics classrooms. M.A. Thesis. University of Haifa, Israel. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  6. Herbst, P. G. & D. Chazan (2003). Exploring the practical rationality of mathematics teaching through coversations about videotaped episodes: the case of engaging students in proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1): 14–2.Google Scholar
  7. Kieran, C., & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Research on the role of technological environments in algebra learning and teaching. In K. Stacey, H. Shick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of Algebra. ICMI Study-12 Volume (pp. 99–152). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. The practitioner inquiry series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 1, 29–63.Google Scholar
  11. Leikin, R., & Rota, S. (2006). A case study on the development of teacher’s proficiency through teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leikin, R. (2005). Teachers’ learning in teaching: Developing teachers’ mathematical knowledge through instructional interactions. The paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study: The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics. http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html
  13. Levenberg, I. (1995). Teacher’s diary. Journal for Mathematics Teachers (ALEE') 17, 73–77 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  14. Lindsay, J. S. (1990). Classroom discourse analysis: A review of the literature with implications for educational evaluation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 107–116.Google Scholar
  15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989, 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  16. Nemirovsky, R. (1996). A functional approach to algebra: Two issues that emerge. In Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 295–316). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Pimm, D. (1996) ‘This is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 371–409). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schifter, D. (1996). What’s happening in math class? Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 44–49.Google Scholar
  21. Stacey, K., & Kendal, M. (2004). Algebra: A world of difference, In: K. Stacey, H. Shick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra. The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 329–346), Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Visual Math: Algebra (1995). Center for educational technology, Ramat-Aviv. http://www.cet.ac.il/math-international/visualizing.htm
  23. Wood, T. (1995). An emerging practice of teaching. In P. Cobb & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds), The emergence of mathematical meaning. Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 203–228). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (2008). Technology and curriculum design: The ordering of discontinuities in school algebra. In L. English et al. (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd edn., pp. 806–837). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Yerushalmy, M., Elikan, S., & Chazan, D. (2000). Discussions in the Mathematics Classroom. Multimedia package (Video and Documents). University of Haifa and Center for Educational Technology, Ramat-Aviv, IL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations