Advertisement

Toward Awakening Consciousness: A Response to EcoJustice Education and Science Education

  • Michael L. Bentley
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 3)

Abstract

In “Ecojustice Education for Science Educators,” Rebecca Martusewicz, John Lupinacci, and Gary Schnakenberg break new ground for the field of science education in relating long-known limits to our ability to understand the cosmos to those eternal mysteries they identify as the meaning of “sacred.” Our fundamental unawareness was well-understood by the medical researcher and gifted science writer, Lewis Thomas, who wrote that, “[t]he only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant of nature” (1974, p. 58). Beginning with the premise of our fundamental inability to ever fully know, Martusewicz, Lupinacci, and Schnakenberg argue that to achieve a sustainable society in proper relation to the ecosystem, science educators will have to rethink the curriculum and adopt a different approach to instruction.

Keywords

Science Education Science Teacher Community School Charter School Sustainable Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baines, L. (2007). Learning from the world: Achieving more by doing less. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 98–100.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Bentley, M. L., Fleury, S. C., & Garrison, J. W. (2007). Critical constructivism for teaching and learning in a democratic society. Journal of Thought, 42, 9–22.Google Scholar
  5. Bracey, G. W. (2009). Education hell: Rhetoric vs. reality. Alexandria: Educational Research Service.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, C. L., & Bentley, M. L. (2004). ELLs: Children left behind in science class. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8, 152–157.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Association of California School Administrators (2008, January 21). Ruling: NCLB an unfunded mandate. EdCal. Retrieved October 23, 2009, from http://www.acsa.org/FunctionalMenuCategories/Media/EdCalNewspaper/2008/January21/RulingNCLBanunfundedmandate.aspx Google Scholar
  9. Corcoran, P. B., & Sievers, E. (1994). Reconceptualizing environmental education: Five possibilities. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corsiglia, J., & Snively, G. (1995). Global lessons from the traditional science of long-resident peoples. In G. Snively & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Thinking globally about mathematics and science education. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Research and Development Group.Google Scholar
  11. Cuban, L. (2008). The perennial reform: Fixing school time. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 240–250.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1987). Freedom. In J. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 11, pp. 247–255). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gibson, R., & Wayne, E. (2009). The education agenda is a war agenda: Connecting reason to power and power to resistance. Workplace, 16, 31–52.Google Scholar
  14. Giroux, H. A. (2009). The corporate stranglehold on education. Sociologias. Retrieved September 8, 2009, from http://sociologias-com.blogspot.com/2009/09/corporate-stranglehold-on-education.html Google Scholar
  15. Glasson, G. E., & Bentley, M. L. (2000). Epistemological undercurrents in scientists’ reporting of research to teachers. Science Education, 84, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glickman, C. (2008). Backtalk: Educators tell business how to stop ruining America. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 392.Google Scholar
  17. Goddard Institute for Space Studies. (2009). GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Global Temperature Trends: 2008 Annual Summation. Retrieved September 19, 2009, from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2008/ Google Scholar
  18. Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (Eds.). (2007). Place-based education in the global age. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Hock, D. (2000). Birth of the Chaordic Age. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Kohl, H. (2009). Good stuff: An open letter to Arne Duncan. Rethinking Schools, 23. Retrieved August 29, 2009, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/23_04/good234.shtml Google Scholar
  21. McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  22. Meier, D. (2008). Schooling for democracy or for the workplace? Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 507–510.Google Scholar
  23. Mueller, M. P., & Bentley, M. L. (2009). Environmental and science education in developing nations: A Ghanaian approach to renewing and revitalizing the local community and ecosystems. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, G. (1997). Environment-population-sustainable development: Where do we go from here? Focus, 7, 36–39.Google Scholar
  26. Obama’s “Race to the Top”. (2009, July 30). Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204886304574308442726348678.html Google Scholar
  27. Perkins, J. (2004). Confessions of an economic hit man. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Reiss, M. J. (1993). Science education for a pluralist society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Self, E. (2009). A school for peace and justice. Educational Leadership, 66(10). Retrieved September 6, 2009, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/jul09/vol66/num10/A_School_for_Peace_and_Justice.aspx Google Scholar
  30. Sleeter, C. E. (2008). Teaching for democracy in an age of corporatocracy. Teachers College Record, 110, 139–159.Google Scholar
  31. Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities. Great Barrington: Orion Society.Google Scholar
  32. Takahisa, S., & Chaluisan, R. (1995). New York City Museum School. In Proceedings, Museum School Symposium: Beginning the Conversation. St. Paul: Science Museum of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  33. Thomas, L. (1974). The medusa and the snail: More notes of a biology watcher. New York: Bantam New Age Books.Google Scholar
  34. Worldwatch Institute. (2009). State of the world: Into a warming world. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Yager, R. E. (Ed.). (1993). What research says to the science teacher, vol. 7: The science, technology, society movement. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  36. Zell, S. K. (1998). Ecofeminism and the science classroom: A practical approach. Science & Education, 7, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao, Y. (2009, August 30). National education standards can end up hurting students. Detroit Freepress, 28A. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://www.freep.com/article/20090830/OPINION01/908300438/1069/OPINION01/National-education-standards-can-end-up-hurting-students Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Bentley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TennesseeTennesseeUSA

Personalised recommendations