Advertisement

The European IVD Directive and Genetic Testing

  • Stuart Hogarth
  • David Barton
  • David Melzer
Chapter

Key Points

• As part of the In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD) sector, genetic tests fall under the broader statutory regimes for the regulation of medical devices. The EU IVD Directive governs the safety, quality and performance of devices by setting out requirements for: placing a product on the market, production, labelling, clinical evaluation/investigation and post-marketing surveillance.

• Based on the EUs New Approach legislation, the Directive sets out broad and general standards for safety and effectiveness in a series of essential requirements with which all IVDs must comply before being placed on the market.

• The regulatory controls to ensure that IVDs are compliant with the Directive are known as conformity assessment procedures. These vary depending on the risks posed by the test. Higher risk tests are subject to independent pre-market review by Notified Bodies, for low risk tests the manufacturer has sole responsibility for assessing conformity with the Directive.

• There has been a prolonged policy debate about how best to ensure the safe and appropriate use of clinical genetic tests and many believe that genetic tests should be subject to independent pre-market evaluation before entering clinical use.

• The IVD Directive, as currently implemented by member states, is considered by many to be an inadequate mechanism for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of genetic tests. In particular there is concern about a number of ambiguities and variations in interpretation and enforcement.

• Key issues which need to be addressed are classification of nearly all tests (including most genetic tests) as low risk and consequent lack of premarket review; confusion about regulatory status of laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) produced by commercial laboratories, and ambiguity about whether manufacturers must provide data on the clinical validity of their tests.

• Revision of the Directive is now being considered by the European Commission who have indicated an interest in addressing some of the issues outlined.

Keywords

Regulation IVD directive Clinical validity Reference materials 

References

  1. DG Enterprise. MEDDEV. 2.14/2 rev.1, February 2004 IVD Guidance: Research Use Only Products. A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified Bodies. Brussels: European Commission, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. EU Medical Devices Experts Group. Report on the Functioning of the Medical Devices Directive. Brussels: European Commission, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. European Association of Notified Bodies for Medical Devices. NB-MED/2.12/Rec1: Post-marketing Surveillance (PMS) Post-market/Production Recommendation. Brussels: European Commission, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. Guidelines on Post Market Clinical Follow-Up MEDDEV 2.12-2. Brussels: European Commission, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. Recast of the Medical Device Directives: Public Consultation. Brussels: European Commission, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. GHTF. Principles of In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Devices Classification, 2008Google Scholar
  7. Higson G. Medical Device Safety – The Regulation of Medical Devices for Public Health and Safety. Bristol: Institute of Physics, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. UK Healthcare Industries Task Force, Minutes of meeting held on 18 December 2003, http://www.advisorybodies.gov.uk/hitf/wg3meeting18dec03.htm, 2003
  9. Hodges C. European regulation of medical devices. In Griffin J, O’Grady J (eds.). The Regulation of Medical Products. London: BMJ, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Hogarth S, Melzer D The IVD Directive and genetic testing: problems and proposals. A Briefing Presented to the 20th Meeting of Competent Authorities. Lisbon: Cambridge University, July 2007.Google Scholar
  11. McGovern MM, Elles R, Beretta I, Somerville MJ, Hoefler G, Keinanen M, Barton D, Carson N, Dequeker E, Brdicka R, Blazkova A, Aymé S, Schnieders B, Müller CR, Dalen V, Martinez AA, Kristoffersson U, Ozguc M, Mueller H, Boone J, Lubin IM, Sequeiros J, Taruscio D, Williamson B, Mainland L, Yoshikura H, Ronchi E. Report of an international survey of molecular genetic testing laboratories. Commun Genet 2007; 10: 123–131 (DOI: 10.1159/000101753).Google Scholar
  12. Pilot L. Medical device labeling in the European Union. Medical Device and Diagnostics Industry, May 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Sale J. Industry point of view. Presentation at Advanstar Conference, Paris, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. Stinshoff K. Role of standards in the assessment of medical devices. Business Briefing – Medical Device Technology and Manufacturing, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biomedicine and Society, King’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Molecular GeneticsNational Centre for Medical Genetics, University College DublinDublinIreland
  3. 3.Epidemiology and Public HealthPeninsula Medical SchoolExeterUK
  4. 4.Epidemiology LaboratoryUS National Institute on AgingBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations