Decomposition of Head-Related Transfer Functions into Multiple Damped and Delayed Sinusoidals

  • Kenneth John FallerII
  • Armando Barreto
  • Malek Adjouadi
Conference paper

Abstract

There are currently two options to achieve binaural sound spatialization using Head-Related Impulse Responses (HRIRs): measure every intended listener’s HRIR or use generic HRIRs. However, measuring HRIRs requires expensive and specialized equipment, which removes its availability to the general public. In contrast, use of generic HRIRs results in higher localization errors. Another possibility that researchers, including our group, are pursuing is the customization of HRIRs. Our group is pursuing this by developing a structural model in which the physical measurements of a new intended listener could be used to synthesize his/her custom-fitted HRIRs, to achieve spatialization equivalent to measured HRIRs. However, this approach requires that HRIRs from multiple subjects be initially broken down in order to reveal the parameters of the corresponding structural models. This paper presents a new method for decomposing HRIRs and tests its performance on simulated examples and actual HRIRs.

Keywords

Head-Related Transfer Functions (HRTFs) Damped and Delayed Sinusoidals (DDS) Hankel Total Least Squares (HTLS) Signal Decomposition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored by NSF grants CNS- 0520811, HRD-0317692, CNS-0426125, and HRD-0833093.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Kassier, H. Lee, T. Brookes, and F. Rumsey, “An Informal Comparison Between Surround-Sound Microphone Techniques,” presented at 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (AES), Barcelona, Spain, May 28-31, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Berkhout, D. Devries, and P. Vogel, “Acoustic Control by Wave Field Synthesis,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 93, pp. 2764-2778, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. Rayleigh, “On Our Perception of the Direction of a Source of Sound,” Proceedings of the Musical Association, vol. 2, pp. 75-84, 1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Batteau, “The Role of the Pinna in Human Localization,” presented at Royal Society of London, Aug 15, 1967, pp. 158-180.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Hebrank and D. Wright, “Spectral Cues Used in the Localization of Sound Sources on the Median Plane,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA), vol. 56, pp. 1829-1834, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. Gardner and K. Martin, “HRTF measurements of a KEMAR dummy-head microphone,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory Vision and Modeling Group, Last Accessed: Sept. 26, 2008; http://sound.media.mit.edu/KEMAR.html.
  7. [7]
    V. Algazi, R. Duda, D. Thompson, and C. Avendano, “The Cipic HRTF database,” 2001 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, Last Accessed: Sept. 26, 2008; http://interface.cipic.ucdavis.edu/.
  8. [8]
    E. Wenzel, M. Arruda, D. Kistler, and F. Wightman, “Localization Using Nonindividualized Head-Related Transfer-Functions,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 94, pp. 111-123, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P. Satarzadeh, V. Algazi, and R. Duda, “Physical and Filter Pinna Models Based on Anthropometry,” in 122nd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Vienna, Austria, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Blauert, Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Barreto and N. Gupta, “Dynamic Modeling of the Pinna for Audio Spatialization,” WSEAS Transactions on Acoustics and Music, vol. 1, pp. 77-82, January 2004.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Proakis and S. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. J. Faller II, A. Barreto, N. Gupta, and N. Rishe, “Decomposition and Modeling of Head-Related Impulse Responses for Customized Spatial Audio,” WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 1, pp. 354-361, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    K. J. Faller II, A. Barreto, N. Gupta, and N. Rishe, “Decomposition of Head Related Impulse Responses by Selection of Conjugate Pole Pairs,” in Advances in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, K. Elleithy, Ed. Netherlands: Springer, 2007, pp. 259-264.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Van Huffel, H. Chen, C. Decanniere, and P. Vanhecke, “Algorithm for Time-Domain NMR Data Fitting Based on Total Least-Squares,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A, vol. 110, pp. 228-237, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Wevers, L. Rippert, J. M. Papy, and S. Van Huffel, “Processing of transient signals from damage in CFRP composite materials monitored with embedded intensity-modulated fiber optic sensors,” Ndt & E International, vol. 39, pp. 229-235, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. Boyer, L. De Lathatrwer, and K. Abed-Meraim, “Higher order tensor-based method for delayed exponential fitting,” Ieee Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, pp. 2795-2809, 2007.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Strum and D. Kirk, First Principles of Discrete Systems and Digital Signal Processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. L. Han, “Measuring a Dummy Head in Search of Pinna Cues,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 42, pp. 15-37, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    T. Nishino, T. Oda, and K. Takeda, “Evaluation of head-related transfer function on the opposite side to a sound source,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 120, pp. 3094-3094, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth John FallerII
    • 1
  • Armando Barreto
    • 1
  • Malek Adjouadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations