Decomposition of Head-Related Transfer Functions into Multiple Damped and Delayed Sinusoidals
Abstract
There are currently two options to achieve binaural sound spatialization using Head-Related Impulse Responses (HRIRs): measure every intended listener’s HRIR or use generic HRIRs. However, measuring HRIRs requires expensive and specialized equipment, which removes its availability to the general public. In contrast, use of generic HRIRs results in higher localization errors. Another possibility that researchers, including our group, are pursuing is the customization of HRIRs. Our group is pursuing this by developing a structural model in which the physical measurements of a new intended listener could be used to synthesize his/her custom-fitted HRIRs, to achieve spatialization equivalent to measured HRIRs. However, this approach requires that HRIRs from multiple subjects be initially broken down in order to reveal the parameters of the corresponding structural models. This paper presents a new method for decomposing HRIRs and tests its performance on simulated examples and actual HRIRs.
Keywords
Head-Related Transfer Functions (HRTFs) Damped and Delayed Sinusoidals (DDS) Hankel Total Least Squares (HTLS) Signal DecompositionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Acknowledgments
This work was sponsored by NSF grants CNS- 0520811, HRD-0317692, CNS-0426125, and HRD-0833093.
References
- [1]R. Kassier, H. Lee, T. Brookes, and F. Rumsey, “An Informal Comparison Between Surround-Sound Microphone Techniques,” presented at 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society (AES), Barcelona, Spain, May 28-31, 2005.Google Scholar
- [2]A. Berkhout, D. Devries, and P. Vogel, “Acoustic Control by Wave Field Synthesis,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 93, pp. 2764-2778, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]L. Rayleigh, “On Our Perception of the Direction of a Source of Sound,” Proceedings of the Musical Association, vol. 2, pp. 75-84, 1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]D. Batteau, “The Role of the Pinna in Human Localization,” presented at Royal Society of London, Aug 15, 1967, pp. 158-180.Google Scholar
- [5]J. Hebrank and D. Wright, “Spectral Cues Used in the Localization of Sound Sources on the Median Plane,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (JASA), vol. 56, pp. 1829-1834, 1974.Google Scholar
- [6]B. Gardner and K. Martin, “HRTF measurements of a KEMAR dummy-head microphone,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory Vision and Modeling Group, Last Accessed: Sept. 26, 2008; http://sound.media.mit.edu/KEMAR.html.
- [7]V. Algazi, R. Duda, D. Thompson, and C. Avendano, “The Cipic HRTF database,” 2001 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, Last Accessed: Sept. 26, 2008; http://interface.cipic.ucdavis.edu/.
- [8]E. Wenzel, M. Arruda, D. Kistler, and F. Wightman, “Localization Using Nonindividualized Head-Related Transfer-Functions,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 94, pp. 111-123, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]P. Satarzadeh, V. Algazi, and R. Duda, “Physical and Filter Pinna Models Based on Anthropometry,” in 122nd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Vienna, Austria, 2007.Google Scholar
- [10]J. Blauert, Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- [11]A. Barreto and N. Gupta, “Dynamic Modeling of the Pinna for Audio Spatialization,” WSEAS Transactions on Acoustics and Music, vol. 1, pp. 77-82, January 2004.Google Scholar
- [12]J. Proakis and S. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar
- [13]K. J. Faller II, A. Barreto, N. Gupta, and N. Rishe, “Decomposition and Modeling of Head-Related Impulse Responses for Customized Spatial Audio,” WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 1, pp. 354-361, 2005.Google Scholar
- [14]K. J. Faller II, A. Barreto, N. Gupta, and N. Rishe, “Decomposition of Head Related Impulse Responses by Selection of Conjugate Pole Pairs,” in Advances in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, K. Elleithy, Ed. Netherlands: Springer, 2007, pp. 259-264.Google Scholar
- [15]S. Van Huffel, H. Chen, C. Decanniere, and P. Vanhecke, “Algorithm for Time-Domain NMR Data Fitting Based on Total Least-Squares,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A, vol. 110, pp. 228-237, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]A. Wevers, L. Rippert, J. M. Papy, and S. Van Huffel, “Processing of transient signals from damage in CFRP composite materials monitored with embedded intensity-modulated fiber optic sensors,” Ndt & E International, vol. 39, pp. 229-235, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]R. Boyer, L. De Lathatrwer, and K. Abed-Meraim, “Higher order tensor-based method for delayed exponential fitting,” Ieee Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, pp. 2795-2809, 2007.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [18]R. Strum and D. Kirk, First Principles of Discrete Systems and Digital Signal Processing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988.Google Scholar
- [19]H. L. Han, “Measuring a Dummy Head in Search of Pinna Cues,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 42, pp. 15-37, 1994.Google Scholar
- [20]T. Nishino, T. Oda, and K. Takeda, “Evaluation of head-related transfer function on the opposite side to a sound source,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 120, pp. 3094-3094, 2006.Google Scholar