Secondary Emotions Deduction from Context
Human centred services are increasingly common in the market of mobile devices. However, affective aware services are still scarce. In turn, the recognition of secondary emotions in mobility conditions is critical to develop affective aware mobile applications. The emerging field of Affective Computing offers a few solutions to this problem. We propose a method to deduce user’s secondary emotions based on context and personal profile. In a realistic environment, we defined a set of emotions common to a museum visit. Then we developed a context aware museum guide mobile application. To deduce affective states, we first used a method based on the user profile solely. Enhancement of this method with machine learning substantially improved the recognition of affective states. Implications for future work are discussed.
Keywordsaffective computing context awareness neural networks basic and secondary emotions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We thank our students (A. Fatiol, O.Litan, R.M. Cimpean, E. Ciurea, M. Herculea) for their help in developing the web based and the J2ME application and to all participants in the tests.
This work benefit by the support of the national contract PN2 Idei number 1062 and CNCSIS type A number 1566.
- R.A. Plutchik, “A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotions. In: Kellerman”, R.P.H. (ed.): Emotion: Theory research and experience, Vol. 1, 1980, pp. 3-33.Google Scholar
- R. Harré, “An Outline of the Social Constructionist Viewpoint”, Harre, R. (ed.), The Social Construction of Emotions. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford and New York, 1989, pp. 2-13.Google Scholar
- K. Issroff, E. Scanlon, and A. Jones, “Affect and mobile technologies: case studies”, Proc. The CSCL alpine rendez-vous, workshop 2: Beyond mobile learning, Trinity College, 2007.Google Scholar
- B. Kort, R. Reilly and R. Picard, “An Affective Model of Interplay between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy-Building a Learning Companion”, Proc. Second IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’01), 2001.Google Scholar
- A. Kapoor, S.Mota and R.W. Picard, “Towards a learning companion that recognizes affect”, In Proc. AAAI Fall Symposium, 2001.Google Scholar
- S.K. D’Mello, S.D. Craig, B. Gholson, S.Franklin, R. Picard and A. Graesser, “Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system”, Proc. Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop Workshop at 2005 International conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, AMC press, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
- T. Yanaru, “An emotion processing system based on fuzzy inference and subjective observations”, Proc. 2nd New Zealand Two-Stream International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Expert Systems (ANNES ‘95), Dunedin, New Zealand,1995, pp. 15-21.Google Scholar
- K.-I. Benţa, H.-I. Lisei and M. Cremene, “Towards a Unified 3D Affective Model”, Proc. Consortium Proceedings of International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII2007), Lisbon, Portugal, 2007.Google Scholar
- S. Mota and R.W. Picard, “Automated posture analysis for detecting learner’s interest level”, Proc. CVPR Workshop on HCI, 2003.Google Scholar
- A. Kapoor, S. Mota and R.W. Picard, “Towards a learning companion that recognizes affect”, Proc. AAAI Fall Symposium, 2001.Google Scholar
- W. Burleson, “Affective learning companions: strategies for empathetic agents with real-time multimodal affective sensing to foster meta-cognitive and meta-affective approaches to learning, motivation, and perseverance”, PhD. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006Google Scholar
- R. Plutchik, The Psychology and Biology of Emotion. Harper Collins New York, 1994.Google Scholar
- D.M. McNair, M. Lorr, L.F. Droppleman, “POMS : Profile Of Mood States”, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1971.Google Scholar
- P. Lonsdale, R. Beale and W. Byrne, “Using context awareness to enhance visitor engagement in a gallery space”, McEwan, T., Gulliksen, J. and Benyon, D. (eds.), Proc. People and computers xix - the bigger picture. Proceedings of HCI 2005, Springer, London, 2005, pp. 101-112.Google Scholar
- O. Stock, M. Zancanaro, P. Busetta, C. Callaway, A. Krüger, M. Kruppa, T. Kuflik, E. Not and C. Rocchi, “Adaptive, intelligent presentation of information for the museum visitor in PEACH”, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction vol. 17(3), 2007.Google Scholar