The Cluster Mission: Space Plasma in Three Dimensions

  • M. G. G. T. TaylorEmail author
  • C. P. Escoubet
  • H. Laakso
  • A. Masson
  • M. L. Goldstein
Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings book series (ASSSP)


At the time of writing, Cluster is approaching 8 years of successful operation and continues to fulfill, if not exceed its scientific objectives. After a nominal mission lifetime of 2 years Cluster currently in its extended mission phase, up to June 2009, with a further extension request submitted for a further 3.5 years. The primary goals of the Cluster mission include three-dimensional studies of small-scale plasma structures and turbulence in the key plasma regions in the Earth’s environment: solar wind and bow shock, magnetopause, polar cusps, magnetotail, and auroral zone. During the course of the mission, the relative distance between the four spacecraft is being varied to form a nearly perfect tetrahedral configuration at 100, 250, 600, 2,000, 5,000 and 10,000 km inter-spacecraft separation targeted to study scientifically interesting regions at different scales. In the last few years, the constellation strategy has moved towards a multi-scale concept, enabling two scale sizes to be investigated at the same time. In these cases, three spacecraft are separated by 10,000 km with the last spacecraft separated from this plane by varying distances from 16 km up to several 1,000 km. This configuration is targeted at boundaries, with the plane of the large-scale triangle parallel to the plane of the boundary and the final spacecraft separated a small distance from the main triangle in the normal direction. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of the mission concept and implementation and highlight a number of Cluster’s latest science results, which include: the first observation of three dimensional (3-D) surface waves on the bow shock, the first 3-D analysis of turbulence in the magnetosheath, the discovery of magnetosonic waves accelerating electrons to MeV energies in the radiation belts, along with a number of discoveries involving magnetic reconnection.


Solar Wind Magnetic Reconnection Plasma Sheet Radiation Belt Substorm Onset 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank all PIs and their teams for their hard work on the Cluster instruments and data, and the JSOC and ESOC teams for their very efficient operation of the Cluster spacecraft.


  1. 1.
    Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS Mission, Space Sci. Rev., doi: 10.1007/s11214–008–9336–1, (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao, J.B., Ma, Y.D., Parks, G., Rème, H., Dandouras, I., Nakamura, R., Zhang, T.L., Zong, Q., Lucek, E., Carr, C.M., Liu, Z.X., Zhou, G.C.: Joint observations by Cluster satellites of bursty flows in the magnetotail, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 111, A04206, 10.1029/2005JA011322, (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chum, J. and Santolik, O.: Propagation of whistler-mode chorus to low altitudes: divergent ray trajectories and ground accessibility, Ann. Geophys., pp. 3727–3738. SRef-ID: 1432–0576/ag/2005–23–3727, (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunlop, M.W., Escoubet, C.P., Liu, Z.-X., Shen, C., Laakso, H., Taylor, M.G.G.T., Fazakerley, A.N., and the Double Star PIs: Double Star: Mission, instruments and joint observations (Dayside Boundary phenomena), this issue, (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Escoubet, C.P., Fehringer, M., Goldstein, M.: The Cluster mission, Ann. Geophys., 19, 1197, (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friis-Christensen, E., Lühr, H., Knudsen, D., Haagmans, R.: Swarm – An Earth Observation Mission investigating Geospace, Adv. Space Res., 41 (1), 210–216, (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haerendel, G., Roux, A., Blanc, M., Paschmann, G., Bryant, D., Korth, A., Hultqvist, B.: Study in three dimensions of plasma turbulence and small-scale structure in the magnetosphere mission proposal submitted to ESA, (1982)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    He, J.-S., Zong, Q.-G., Deng, X.-H., Tu, C.-Y., Xiao, C.-J., Wang, X.-G., Ma, Z.-W., Pu, Z.-Y., Lucek, E., Pedersen, A., Fazakerley, A., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Dunlop, M.W., Tian, H., Yao, S., Tan, B., Fu, S.-Y., Glassmeier, K.-H., Rème, H., Dandouras, I., Escoubet, C.P.: Electron trapping around a magnetic null, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L14104,, (2008)
  9. 9.
    Henderson, P.D., Owen, C.J., Lahiff, A.D., Alexeev, I.V., Fazakerley, A.N., Lucek, E., Rème, H.: Cluster PEACE observations of electron pressure tensor divergence in the magnetotail, Geophys. Res. Lett., Vol. 33, No. 22, L22106,, (2006)
  10. 10.
    Horne, R.B., Thorne, R.M., Glauert, S.A., Meredith, N.P., Pokhotelov, D., Santolík, O.: Electron acceleration in the Van Allen radiation belts by fast magnetosonic waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L17107,, (2007)
  11. 11.
    Laakso, H.C. Perry, S. McCaffrey, D. Herment, A.J. Allen, C.C. Harvey, C.P. Escoubet, C. Gruenberger, M.G.G.T. Taylor, and R. Turner, Cluster Active Archive: overview, this issue, (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, Z.X., Escoubet, C.P., Pu, Z., Laakso, H., Shi, J.K., Shen, C., Hapgood, M.: The Double Star Mission, Ann. Geophys., Page(s) 2707–2712. SRef-ID: 1432–0576/ag/2005–23–2707, (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Louarn, P., Le Quéau, D.: Generation of the auroral kilometric radiation in plasma cavities-II. The cyclotron maser instability in small size sources, Planet. Space Sci., 44, 211–224, (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marklund, G.; Johansson, T.; Lileo, S.; Karlsson, T.: Cluster observations of an auroral potential and associated field-aligned current reconfiguration during thinning of the plasma sheet boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 112, No. A1, A01208,, (2007)
  15. 15.
    Matthaeus, W.H., Montgomery, D.C.: Selective decay hypothesis at high mechanical and magnetic Reynolds numbers, in Nonlinear Dynamics, ed. Hellman, Hobert H. G., Proc. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Vol.357, pp. 203, (1980)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mutel, R.L., Christopher, I.W., Pickett, J.S.: Cluster multispacecraft determination of AKR angular beaming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07104, (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moullard, O., Burgess, D., Horbury, T.S., Lucek, E.A.: Ripples observed on the surface of the Earth’s quasi-perpendicular bow shock, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 111, No. A9, A09113,, (2006)
  18. 18.
    Nakamura, R., Baumjohann, W., Fujimoto, M., Asano, Y., Runov, A., Owen, C.J., Fazakerley, A.N., Klecker, B., Rème, H., Lucek, E.A., André, M., Khotyaintsev, Y.: Cluster observations of an ion-scale current sheet in the magnetotail under the presence of a guide field, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A07S16,, (2008)
  19. 19.
    Nykyri, K., Otto, A., Lavraud, B., Mouikis, C., Kistler, L.M., Balogh, A., Rème, H.: Cluster Observations of reconnection due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the dawnside magnetospheric flank, Annales Geophysicae, 2619–2643, Vol. 24, No. 10, (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phan, T.D., Gosling, J.T., Davies, M.S., Skoug, R.M., Øieroset, M., Lepping, R.P., McComas, D.J., Smith, C.W., Rème, H., Balogh, A.: A Magnetic reconnection X-line extending more than 390 Earth Radii in the solar wind, Nature, Vol. 439, (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phan, T.D., Drake, J.F., Shay, M.A., Mozer, F.S., Eastwood, J.P.: Evidence for an Elongated ( > 60 Ion Skin Depths) Electron Diffusion Region during Fast Magnetic Reconnection, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 255002, (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pritchett, P.L., Strangeway, R.J., Ergun, R.E., Carlson, C.W.: Generation and propagation of cyclotron maser emissions in the finite auroral kilometric radiation source cavity, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A12), 1437, doi:10.1029/2002JA009403, (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Retinò, A., Sundkvist, D., Vaivads, A., Mozer, F., Andre, M., Owen, C.J.: In-situ evidence of magnetic reconnection in turbulent plasma, Nature Physics, March 25, doi:10.1038/nphys574, (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Runov, A., Baumjohann, W., Nakamura, R., Sergeev, V.A., Amm, O., Frey, H., Alexeev, I., Fazakerley, A.N., Owen, C.J., Lucek, E.A., André, M., Vaivads, A., Dandouras, I., Klecker, B.: Observations of an active thin current sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A07S27, doi:10.1029/2007JA012685, (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sahraoui, F.; Belmont, G., Rezeau, L., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Pinçon, J.-L., Balogh, A.: Anisotropic turbulent spectra in the terrestrial magnetosheath: Cluster observations, Physical Review Letters, 96, 075002, (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sahraoui, F.: Diagnosis of magnetic structures and intermittency in space-plasma turbulence using the technique of surrogate data Phys. Rev. E, 78, 026402, (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Santolik, O., Chum, J., Parrot, M., Gurnett, D.A., Pickett, J.S., Cornilleau–Wehrlin, N.: Propagation of whistler mode chorus to low altitudes: Spacecraft observations of structured ELF hiss, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A10208, doi:10.1029/2005JA011462, (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sergeev, V., Semenov, V., Kubyshkina, M., Ivanova, V., Baumjohann, W., Nakamura, R., Penz, T., Runov, A., Zhang, T.L., Glassmeier, K.-H., Angelopoulos, V., Frey, H., Sauvaud, J.-A., Daly, P., Cao, J.B., Singer, H., Lucek, E.: Observation of repeated intense near-Earth reconnection on closed field lines with Cluster, Double Star, and other spacecraft, Geophys. Res. Lett., Vol. 34, No. 2, (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trines, R., Bingham, R., Dunlop, M.W., Vaivads, A., Davies, J.A., Mendonça, J.T., Silva, L.O., Shukla, P.K.: Spontaneous Generation of Self-Organized Solitary Wave Structures at Earth’s Magnetopause, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 205006, (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Volpp, J., Escoubet, C.P., Foley, S., Godfrey, J., Hapgood, M., Pallaschke, S.: Cluster constellation change manoeuvres – Management and Operations, SpaceOps 2004, Montreal, Canada, (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xiao, C.J., Wang, X.G., Pu, Z.Y., Ma, Z.W., Zhao, H., Zhou, G.P., Wang, J.X., Kivelson, M.G., Fu, S.Y., Liu, Z.X., Zong, Q.G., Dunlop, M.W., Glassmeier, K.-H., Lucek, E., Rème, H., Dandouras, I., Escoubet, C.P.: Satellite observations of separator line geometry of three-dimensional magnetic reconnection, Nature Physics, 3, 609–613, doi:10.1038/nphys650, (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. G. T. Taylor
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. P. Escoubet
    • 1
  • H. Laakso
    • 1
  • A. Masson
    • 1
  • M. L. Goldstein
    • 2
  1. 1.ESA/ESTEC, D-SRENoordwijkThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Code 673, NASA/GSFCGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations