Advertisement

Introduction: Some Basic Remarks on Sustainable Forest Management, Environment and Global Ethics

  • Hartmut IhneEmail author
  • Peter Spathelf
Chapter
Part of the Managing Forest Ecosystems book series (MAFE, volume 19)

Abstract

Conceptions and implementation of SFM are based on different theoretical approaches of ‘conservation’. They imply various dimensions of development and a broad range of interests, perspectives, values, and philosophies of the individuals and collectives affected and involved (political, religious, economic, social, theoretical, etc.). Globalisation and global change makes this already complex relationship even more intricate. Down-to-earth approaches to SFM primarily have to describe their underlying theoretical assumptions, ethical values, and operational and political goals. Otherwise, they run the risk of being sound in theory but not applicable in practise.

References

  1. Attfield R (1999) The ethics of the global environment. Edinburgh, pp 232Google Scholar
  2. Bierbaum R, Holdren JP, MacCracken M, Moss RH, Raven PH, Schellnhuber HJ (2007) Confronting climate change: Avoiding the unmanageable and managing the unavoidable. SIGMA XI, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  3. Burger D (2005) Requirements for sustainable forest management following the paradigm of sustainable development. In: Burger, Hess, Lang (eds) Forest certification: an innovative instrument in the service of sustainable development? Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn, pp 61–76Google Scholar
  4. Carlowitz von HC (1713) Sylvicultura oeconomica, oder hausswirtliche Nachricht und Naturmässige Anweisung zur wilden Baum-Zucht.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrenfeld D (1978) The arrogance of humanism. Oxford, New York, pp 286Google Scholar
  6. Gatzweiler F (2004) The changing nature of economic value. Indigenous forest garden values in Kalimantatan, Aachen, Indonesia, pp 249Google Scholar
  7. Habermas J (1988) Aus Katastrophen lernen? In: Jürgen Habermas: Die postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays. Frankfurt am Main, pp 65–90Google Scholar
  8. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007 – Synthesis Report. Summary for Policy Makers. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm_OnlinePDF.pdf. Accessed March 2008
  9. Norton BG (1987) Why preserve natural variety? Princeton (NY) Biodiv Ref QH75 .N67Google Scholar
  10. Puettmann KJ, Messier CC, Coates KD (2008) Critique of silviculture: managing for complexity. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 188Google Scholar
  11. Schanz H (1996) Sustainable forest management – on the meanings and functions of a central term in forestry. Voluntary Paper for XI. World Forest Congress, Antalya 1997Google Scholar
  12. Senghaas D (2002) Kulturelle Globalisierung – ihre Kontexte, ihre Varianten. In: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (Hrsg.). Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 12. 6–9Google Scholar
  13. Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural theory. Boulder, SanFrancisco, Oxford, pp 1–18, 25–38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied SciencesSankt AugustinGermany
  2. 2.University of Applied Sciences EberswaldeEberswaldeGermany

Personalised recommendations