Advertisement

A Review of Research on Impulsive Loading of Marine Composites

  • Maurizio PorfiriEmail author
  • Nikhil Gupta

Abstract

Impulsive loading conditions, such as those produced by blast waves, are being increasingly recognized as relevant in marine applications. Significant research efforts are directed towards understanding the impulsive loading response of traditional naval materials, such as aluminum and steel, and advanced composites, such as laminates and sandwich structures. Several analytical studies are directed towards establishing predictive models for structural response and failure of marine structures under blast loading. In addition, experimental research efforts are focused on characterizing structural response to blast loading. The aim of this review is to provide a general overview of the state of the art on analytical and experimental studies in this field that can serve as a guideline for future research directions. Reported studies cover the Office of Naval Research-Solid Mechanics Program sponsored research along with other worldwide research efforts of relevance to marine applications. These studies have contributed to developing a fundamental knowledge of the mechanics of advanced materials subjected to impulsive loading, which is of interest to all Department of Defense branches.

Keywords

Shock Tube Blast Wave Glass Fiber Reinforce Polymeric Face Sheet Standoff Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Office of Naval Research grant N00014-07-1-0419 with Dr. Y.D.S. Rajapakse as the program manager. Views expressed herein are those of authors, and not of the funding agency. The authors acknowledge Mr. G. Tagliavia for his help in collecting literature and Dr. S.D. Peterson for his careful review of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Cullis IG (2001) Blast waves and how they interact with structures. J Res Army Med Corps 147:16–26.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keil AH (1956) Introduction to underwater explosion research. Norfolk Naval Ship Yard, Portsmouth, VA:UERD.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taylor GI (1963) The pressure and impulse of submarine explosion waves on plates, 1941. The Scientific Papers of G I Taylor, Vol. III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 287–303.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stapley SA, Cannon LB (2006) An overview of the pathophysiology of gunshot and blast injury with resuscitation guidelines. Curr Orthopaedics 20:322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horrocks CL (2001) Blast injuries:Biophysics, pathophysiology, and management principles. J Res Army Med Corps 147:28–40.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ofengeim DK, Drikakis D (1997) Simulation of blast wave propagation over a cylinder. Shock Waves 7:305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunter KS, Geers TL (2004) Pressure and velocity fields produced by an underwater explosion. J Acoust Soc Am 115(4):1483–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kadioglu SY, Sussman M (2008) Adaptive solution techniques for simulating underwater explosions and implosions. J Comput Phys 227:2083–2104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie WF, Liu TG, Khoo BC (2007) The simulation of cavitating flows induced by underwater shock and free surface interaction. Appl Num Math 57:734–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Turner SE (2007) Underwater implosion of glass spheres. J Acoust Soc Am 121(2):844–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ohyagi S, Obara T, Nakata F, Hoshi S (2000) A numerical simulation of reflection processes of a detonation wave on a wedge. Shock Waves 10:185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shi Y, Hao H, Li Z-X (2007) Numerical simulation of blast wave interaction with structure columns. Shock Waves 17:113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hall DJ (1989) Examination of the effects of underwater blasts on sandwich composite structures. Compos Struct 11:101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajendran R, Paik JK, Lee JM (2007) Of underwater explosion experiments on plane plates. Exp Tech 31:18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wei Z, Dharmasena KP, Wadley HNG, Evans AG (2007) Analysis and interpretation of a test for characterizing the response of sandwich panels to water blast. Int J Impact Eng 34(10):1602–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hammond L, Grzebieta R (2000) Structural response of submerged air-backed plates by experimental and numerical analyses. Shock Vibrat 7(6):333–341.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramajeyathilagam R, Vendhan CP (2004) Deformation and rupture of thin rectangular plates subjected to underwater shock. Int J Impact Eng 30:699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hung CF, Hsu PY, Hwang-Fuu JJ (2005) Elastic shock response of an air-backed plate to underwater explosion. Int J Impact Eng 31:151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McShane GJ, Radford DD, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2006) The response of clamped sandwich plates with lattice cores subjected to shock loading. Eur J Mech —A/Solids 25:215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Radford DD, McShane GJ, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2006) The response of clamped sandwich plates with metallic foam cores to simulated blast loading. International J Solids Struct 43:2243–2259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deshpande VS, Heaver A, Fleck NA (2006) An underwater shock simulator. Proc Royal Soc A 462:1021–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Espinosa HD, Lee S, Moldovan N (2006) A novel fluid structure interaction experiment to investigate deformation of structural elements subjected to impulsive loading. Exp Mech 46:805–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mouritz AP (1996) The effect of underwater explosion shock loading on the flexural properties of Grp laminates. Int J Impact Eng 18(2):129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mouritz AP (1995) The effect of underwater explosion shock loading on the fatigue behaviour of GRP laminates. Composites 26(1):3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mouritz AP, Saunders DS, Buckley S (1994) The damage and failure of GRP laminates by underwater explosion shock loading. Composites 25(6):431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mouritz AP (1994) Failure mechanisms of mild-steel bolts under different tensile loading rates. Int J Impact Eng 15:311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tekalur SA, Shukla A, Shivakumar K (2008) Blast resistance of polyurea based layered composite materials. Compos Struct 84:271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tekalur SA, Shivakumar K, Shukla A (2008) Mechanical behavior and damage evolution in E-glass vinyl ester and carbon composites subjected to static and blast loads. Compos B:Eng 39:57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turkmen HS, Mecitoglu Z (1999) Dynamic response of a stiffened laminated composite plate subjected to blast load. J Sound Vibr 221(3):260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Comtois JLR, Edwards MR, Oakes MC (1999) The effect of explosives on polymer matrix composite laminates. Compos Pt A-Appl Sci Manuf 30:181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Turkmen HS (2002) Structural response of laminated composite shells subjected to blast loading:Comparison of experimental and theoretical methods. J Sound Vibr 249:663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gning PB, Tarfaoui M, Collombet F, Riou L, Davies P (2005) Damage development in thick composite tubes under impact loading and influence on implosion pressure:experimental observations. Compos B:Eng 36(4):306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Slater JE (1994) Selection of a blast-resistant GRP composite panel design for naval ship structures. Marine Struct 7(2–5):417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    LeBlanc J, Shukla A, Rousseau C, Bogdanovich A (2007) Shock loading of three-dimensional woven composite materials. Compos Struct 79(3):344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ribeiro J, Plaksin I, Campos J, Mendes R, Gois J (2000) Process of shock attenuation inside a hollow glass microsphere/polymeric composite media. AIP Conf Proc 505:559–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ribeiro J, Campos J, Plaksin I, Mendes R (2002) Shock wave propagation process in epoxy syntactic foams. AIP Conf Proc 620:721–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ribeiro J, Campos J, Mendes R, Plaksin I (2003) Wide range shock wave data for polyester syntactic foams. J Phys IV 110:785–791.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ribeiro J, Campos J, Plaksin I, Mendes R, Góis J (2003) Asymmetric collapse and micro-jetting in shock wave propagation in porous materials. Phys IV 110:887–893.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Panchal KV (2008) Development of a shock test method for characterization of shock response of materials. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Brooklyn, NY:Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tagliavia G, Porfiri M, Gupta N (2009) Damping characteristics of glass hollow particle filled vinyl ester matrix composites. J Comp Mater 43(5):561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gupta N, Ricci W (2006) Comparison of compressive properties of layered syntactic foams having gradient in microballoon volume fraction and wall thickness. Mat Sci Eng A 427:331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Porfiri M, Nguyen NQ, Gupta N (2009) Thermal conductivity of multi-phase particulate composite materials. J Mater Sci in press:doi:10.1007/s10853-10008-13040-10850, 44(6):1485–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Porfiri M, Gupta N (2009) Effect of volume fraction and wall thickness on the elastic properties of hollow particle filled composites. Compos B:Eng in press:doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.1009.1002, 40(2):166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Langdon GS, Cantwell WJ, Nurick GN (2005) The blast response of novel thermoplastic-based fibre–metal laminates —some preliminary results and observations. Compos Sci Technol 65:861–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cole RH (1965) Underwater Explosions, Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gupta AD, Gregory FH, Bitting RL, Bhattacharya S (1987) Dynamic analysis of an explosively loaded hinged rectangular plate. Comput Struct 26(1–2):339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jiang J, Olson MD (1991) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of blast loaded cylindrical shell structures. Comput Struct 40:1139–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Louca LA, Pan YG, Harding JE (1998) Response of stiffened and unstiffened plates subjected to blast loading. Eng Struct 20(12):1079–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Librescu L, Nosier A (1990) Response of laminated composite flat panels to sonic boom and explosive blast loadings. Am Inst Aeron Astron J 28:345–352.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Houlston R, Slater JE (1993) Damage analysis with ADINA of naval panels subjected to a confined air-blast wave. Comput Struct 47(4–5):629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Houlston R, Slater JE (1991) Global and local modelling of naval panels subjected to shock loads. Comput Struct 40(2):353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Houlston R, Slater JE, Pegg N, Desrochers CG (1985) On analysis of structural response of ship panels subjected to air blast loading. Comput Struct 21(1–2):273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Batra RC, Hassan NM (2007) Response of fiber reinforced composites to underwater explosive loads. Compos B:Eng 38:448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hassan NM, Batra RC (2008) Modeling damage in polymeric composites. Compos B:Eng 39:66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gupta NK, Nagesh S (2007) Deformation and tearing of circular plates with varying support conditions under uniform impulsive loads. Int J Impact Eng 34:42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Li QM, Jones N (1999) Shear and adiabatic shear failures in an impulsively loaded fully clamped beam. Int J Impact Eng 22:589–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hayman B (1995) Underwater explosion loading on foam-cored sandwich panels. Proceedings from the third inter-national conference on sandwich construction, Southampton, England.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Librescu L, Oh S-Y, Hohe J (2006) Dynamic response of anisotropic sandwich flat panels to underwater and in-air explosions. Int J Solids Struct 43:3794–3816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Qin Z, Batra RC (2009) Local slamming impact of sandwich composite hulls. Int J Solids Struct 46:2011–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    McCoy RW, Sun CT (1997) Fluid—structure interaction analysis of a thick-section composite cylinder subjected to underwater blast loading. Compos Struct 37:45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Makinen K (1999) The transverse response of sandwich panels to an underwater shock wave. J Fluids Struct 13:631–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2005) One-dimensional response of sandwich plates to underwater shock loading. J Mech Phys Solids 53:2347–2383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tilbrook MT, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2006) The impulsive response of sandwich beams:Analytical and numerical investigation of regimes of behaviour. J Mech Phys Solids 54:2242–2280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Main JA, Gazonas GA (2008) Uniaxial crushing of sandwich plates under air blast:Influence of mass distribution. Int J Solids Struct 45:2297–2321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kambouchev N, Noels L, Radovitsky R (2006) Nonlinear compressibility effects in fluid—structure interaction and their implications on the air-blast loading of structures. J App Phys 100:063519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Liang Y, Spuskanyuk AV, Hayhurst DR, Hutchinson JW, McMeeking RM, Evans AG (2007) The response of metallic sandwich panels to water blast. J Appl Mech-Trans ASME 74:81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vaziri A, Hutchinson JW (2007) Metal sandwich plates subject to intense air shocks. Int J Solids Struct 44:2021–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wei Z, Deshpande VS, Evans AG, Dharmasena KP, Queheillalt DT, Wadley HNG, et al. (2008) The resistance of metallic plates to localized impulse. J Mech Phys Solids 56:2074–2091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    McMeeking RM, Spuskanyuk AV, He MY, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Evans AG (2008) An analytic model for the response to water blast of unsupported metallic sandwich panels. Int J Solids Struct 45:478–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Parga-Landa B, Vlegels S, Hernandez-Olivares F, Clark SD (1999) An analytical study of the effect of slamming pressures on the interlaminar behaviour of composite panels. Compos Struct 46:357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chung C-H, Lee Y-J (2008) Progressive failure of marine GFRP laminated plates impulsive water pressure. J Comp Mater 42:335–365.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Downs-Honey R, Edinger S, Battley M (2006) Slam testing of sandwich panels. Sampe J 42:47–55.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Liang C-C, Tai Y-S (2006) Shock responses of a surface ship subjected to noncontact underwater explosions. Ocean Eng 33(5–6):748–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gong SW, Lam KY (1998) Transient response of stiffened composite submersible hull subjected to underwater explosive shock. Compos Struct 41:27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shin YS (2004) Ship shock modeling and simulation for far-field underwater explosion. Com-put Struct 82(23–26):2211–2219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zong Z, Lam KY, Liu GR (1999) Probabilistic risk prediction of submarine pipelines subjected to underwater explosion shock. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng-Trans ASME 121(4):251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kwon YW, Cunningham RE (1998) Comparison of USA-DYNA finite element models for a stiffened shell subject to underwater shock. Comput Struct 66(1):127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kwon YW, Jo JC (2008) 3D modeling of fluid—structure interaction with external flow using coupled LBM and FEM. J Press Vessel Technol-Trans ASME 130:8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringPolytechnic Institute of New York UniversityBrooklyn

Personalised recommendations