Advertisement

Abstract

The delamination resistance of filament wound glass/epoxy cylinders has been characterized for a range of winding angles and fracture mode ratios using beam fracture specimens. The results reveal that the delamination fracture resistance increases with increasing winding angle and mode II (shear) fraction (GΠ/G). It was also found that interlaced fiber bundles in the filament wound cylinder wall acted as effective crack arresters in mode I loading. To examine the sensitivity of delamina-tion damage on the strength of the cylinders, external pressure tests were performed on filament-wound glass/epoxy composite cylinders with artificial defects and impact damage. The results revealed that the cylinder strength was insensitive to the presence of single delaminations but impact damage caused reductions in failure pressure. The insensitivity of the failure pressure to a single delamination is attributed to the absence of buckling of the delaminated sublaminates before the cylinder wall collapsed. The impacted cylinders contained multiple delaminations, which caused local reduction in the compressive load capability and reduction in failure pressure. The response of glass/epoxy cylinders was compared to impacted carbon reinforced cylinders. Carbon/epoxy is more sensitive to damage but retains higher implosion resistance while carbon/PEEK shows the opposite trend.

Keywords

Hoop Stress Impact Damage Diameter Cylinder Composite Cylinder Large Cylinder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been conducted within a cooperative program between the French Oceanographic Research Organization, IFREMER, and the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Florida Atlantic University (FAU). The participation of FAU in this program is sponsored by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) with Dr. Yapa D. S. Rajapakse as the program monitor. The research of F. Ozdil and Xiaoming Li is greatly appreciated. Additional results from IFREMER studies and the European EUCLID RTP 3.8 project are also presented. Technical support in the pressure test programme from members of the Materials and Structures group at IFREMER, P. Warnier, E. Person, L. Riou, A. Deuff and J J. Le Roy, is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are due to Mr. Josh Kahn, Ms. N. Carr, and Mr. M. Farooq for help with preparation of this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Davies P (2008) Review of standard procedures for delamination resistance testing, Chapter 3 in Delamination behaviour of composites, editor S. Sridharan, Woodhead, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riddle RA, Beckwith SW (1986) Development of Test and Analysis Methods for Thick-Wall Graphite/Epoxy Filament Wound Composite Materials Fracture Toughness, ASTM STP 893:64–83Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies P, Rannou F (1995) The effect of defects in Tubes, Appl Compos Mater 1:333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alderson KL, Evans KE (1992) Failure mechanisms during the transverse loading of filament-wound pipes under static and low velocity impact conditions, Composites 23(3):167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evans KE, Alderson KL, Marks PR (1992) Modelling of the transverse loading of filament wound pipes, Comput Struct 45(5/6):1089–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curtis J, Hinton MJ, Li S, Reid SR, Soden PD (2000) Damage, deformation and residual burst strength of filament wound composite tubes subjected to impact or quasi-static indentation, Compos Part B 31:419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christoforou AP, Swanson SR, Ventrello SC, Beckwith SW (1987) Impact damage in car-bon/epoxy composite cylinders, Proc 32nd Int SAMPE Symp April:964–973Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gning PB, Tarfaoui M, Collombet F, Riou L, Davies P (2005) Damage development in thick composite tubes under impact loading and influence on implosion pressure:experimental observations, Compos Part B Eng 36(4):306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies P, Riou L, Mazeas F, Warnier P (2005) Thermoplastic composite cylinders for underwater applications, J Thermoplastic Compos Mater 18(5):417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozdil F, Carlsson LA (2000) Characterization of mode I delamination growth in glass/epoxy composite cylinders, J Compos Mater 34:398–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ozdil F, Carlsson LA, Li X (2000) Characterization of mode II delamination growth in glass/epoxy composite cylinders, J Compos Mater 34:274–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozdil F, Carlsson LA (2000) Characterization of mixed mode delamination growth in glass/epoxy composite cylinders, J Compos Mater 34:420–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanderkley PS (1981) Mode I—Mode II delamination fracture toughness of a unidirectional graphite/epoxy composite, MS thesis, Texas A&M University, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilkins DJ, Eisenmann JR, Camin RA, Margolis WS, Benson RA (1982) Characterizing de-lamination growth in graphite/epoxy, ASTM STP 775:168–183Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berry JP (1962) Determination of fracture surface energies by the cleavage technique, J Appl Phys 34:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ewalds HL, Wanhill RJH (1989) Fracture Mechanics, Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Russell AJ, Street KN (1982) Factors affecting the interlaminar fracture energy of graphite/epoxy laminates, Proc ICCM 4:227–286Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carlsson LA, Gillespie Jr JW, Pipes RB (1986) On the analysis and design of the end-notched flexure (ENF) specimen for mode II testing, Compos Mater 20:594–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang Y, Williams JG (1992) Corrections for mode II fracture toughness specimens of composite materials, Compos Sci Tech 43:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gere JM, Timoshenko SP (1997) Mechanics of Materials (4th edn.), PWS, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mistry J, Gibson G, Wu Y-S (1992) Failure of composite cylinders under combined external pressure and axial loading, Compos Struct 22(4):193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hinton MJ, Soden PD, Kaddour AS (1996) Strength of composite laminates under biaxial loads, Appl Compos Mater 3:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kardomateas GA, Chung CB (1992) Thin film modeling of delamination buckling in pressure loaded laminated cylindrical shells, A1AA J, 30:2119–2123Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whitcomb JD (1986) Parametric analytical study of instability-related delamination growth, Compos Sci Technol 25:19–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buckingham E (1914) On physically similar systems;illustrations of the use of dimensional equations, Phys Rev 4:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morton J (1988) Scaling of impact-loaded carbon-fiber composites, AIAA J August:989Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Swanson SR, Smith NL, Qian Y (1991) Analytical and experimental strain response in impact of composite cylinders, Compos Struct 18:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davies P (1999) Scale and size effects in the mechanical characterization of composite and sandwich materials, Proc ICCM-12, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Casari P, Jacquemin F, Davies P (2006) Characterization of residual stresses in wound composite tubes, Compos Part A, 37(2):337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials &Structures GroupIFREMERPlouzanéFrance
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations