Agrofuels in Thailand: Policies, Practices and Prospects

  • Rajesh DanielEmail author
  • Louis LebelEmail author
  • Shabbir H. Gheewala


Agrofuels, defined here as agriculture-based liquid transportation fuels, have been widely promoted as a renewable, sustainable, energy source which could reduce dependency on fossil-fuel imports. But the evidence of current and potential future contributions to sustainability is modest and mixed, varying with crops, places, markets and societies.


Thai Government Jatropha Plantation International Water Management Institute Ethanol Price Cassava Ethanol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahmad Al, Ismail SB, Bhatia S (2005) Water recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. J Desal 157(1–3):87–95Google Scholar
  2. APEC (2008) Thailand biofuels activities. APEC BiofuelsGoogle Scholar
  3. ARDA (2005) Bio-diesel and Thai Community Development. In: Proceedings of the first conference on plants for energy research, Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organisation) (ARDA), BangkokGoogle Scholar
  4. Artachinda A (2000) Bio fuel development and consumption in Thailand. Mekong Environment and Resource Institute (MERI), BangkokGoogle Scholar
  5. African U ion (AU) Monitor (2008) Biofuel and Food Security. African Union (AU) MonitorGoogle Scholar
  6. Bangkok Post (2008a) Bio-diesel squeezes palm supply. January 16, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Bangkok Post (2008b) Should Thai cars be gorging themselves on Thai food? January 16. Available at:
  8. Bangkok Post (2008c) Will palm oil profits push Thai fruit and coffee off the field? 12 March. Available at:
  9. Bioenergy Business (04 March 2009) Germany funds €3.5m Thai sustainable palm oil projectGoogle Scholar
  10. Biswas AK, Seetharam KE (2008) Achieving water security for Asia. Water Resour Dev 24(1):145–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler R, Laurance W (2008) New strategies for conserving tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 23:469–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CIAT (2008) Partnership with TTDI to enhance cassava production and farmer livelihoods in Thailand. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)Google Scholar
  13. CSR (2007) Biofuel refugees. CSR Asia Weekly, vol 5 Week 17 Corporate Social Responsibility AsiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Danielsen F, Buekema H, Burgess N, Parish F, Bruhl C, Donald P, Murdiyarso D, Phalan B, Reijnders L, Struebig M, Fitzherbert E (2009) Biofuel plantations on forested lands: double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conservation Biology 23(2)Google Scholar
  15. DEDE (2003) Nayobay Palangan Thaen Dan Cheuapleung Ethanol. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE), Ministry of Energy, Thailand, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  16. Doornbusch R, Steenblik R (2007) Biofuels: is the cure worse than the disease? In: Honnens H (ed) OECD‘s round table on sustainable development. OECDGoogle Scholar
  17. Dufey A (2006) Biofuels production, trade and sustainable development: emerging issues. Sustainable Markets Discussion Paper Number 2. Environmental Economics Programme/Sustainable Markets Group, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)Google Scholar
  18. Tegtmeier E et al. (2004) External costs of agricultural production in the United States. Int J Agric Sustain 2(1): 1–20Google Scholar
  19. Eaves J, Eaves S (2007) Neither renewable nor reliable. Regulation Fall:24–27Google Scholar
  20. Ekvitthayavechnukul C (2008) Biofuel agency to be formed: formulating policy for biodiesel and ethanol to be among main remits, The Nation, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  21. Ethnic Community Development Forum (ECDF) (2007) “Biofuel by Decree”. Chiang Mai, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  22. EuropaBio (2008) Fact sheet: biofuels and land use. The European Association for Bioindustries. 17 AprilGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission (2003) Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport. Official journal of the European communities, 17 May 2003, L123/42–46. European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  24. FAO (2008) Biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities The State of Food and Agriculture 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  25. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon Debt. Science 319:1235–1238Google Scholar
  26. FOE (2007) ‘Policy, practice, pride and prejudice’ Friends of the Earth (FOE), Netherlands, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Foreign Office Thailand (2008) The Policy of Thai Food Security and Food Safety Foreign Office. The Government Public Relations Department, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  28. Fraiture Cd, Giordano M, Liao Y (2008) Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy 10:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fungtammasan B (2008) Thailand’s renewable energy policies and programs: focus on bioenergy and biofuels. Energy and Environment Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Galloway J et al (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldemberg J (2008) Opinion: the challenge of biofuels. Energy Environ Sci 1:523–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Guardabassi P (2008) The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy Policy 36(6):2086–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldemberg J, Guardabassi P (2009) Are biofuels a feasible option? Energy Policy 37(1):10–14Google Scholar
  34. Gonsalves JB (2006) An Assessment of the biofuels industry in Thailand. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  35. Gonzales ADC (2008) Overall stocktaking of biofuel development in Asia-Pacific: benefits and challenges. United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), BangkokGoogle Scholar
  36. Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2008) Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends Ecol Evol 23:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griggers C (2004) Biofuels: a natural solution to rising oil costs. Thailand Investment Review-Board of Investment (BOI)Google Scholar
  38. Himmell ME (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315:804–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoekman S (2009) Biofuels in the U.S. – challenges and opportunities. Renewable Energy 34:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. IFPRI (2007) The world food situation: new driving forces and required actions. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. IWMI (2008a) Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka
  42. IWMI (2008b) Water implications of biofuel crops: Understanding trade offs and identifying options. Water Policy Brief: Putting Research Knowledge into Action. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
  43. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (April 2008) World economic outlook. International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  44. IJO (2007) Jatropha curcas – A country-by-country lookout. Jatropha News Network. International Jatropha Organization (IJO), Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  45. IPS (2008) Jatropha key to self-sufficiency? Inter Press Service (IPS), ManilaGoogle Scholar
  46. Kapilkarn K, Peugtong A (2007) A comparison of costs of bio-diesel production from transesterification. Int Energy J 8:1–6Google Scholar
  47. Kent A, Mercer D (2006) Australia’s mandatory renewable energy target (MRET): an assessment. Energy Policy 34:1046–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim H, Kim S, Dale BE (2009) Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. Environ Sci Technol 43:961–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kløverpris J, Wenzel H, Nielsen PH (2008) Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption. Part 1: conceptual analysis and methodological proposal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:13–21Google Scholar
  50. Latner K, O’Kray C, Jiang J (2006) Strict government control characterizes Chinese biofuel development. An online review of Foreign Agricultural Service initiatives and services. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)Google Scholar
  51. Lopez GP, Laan T (2008) Biofuels at what cost? Government support for biodiesel in Malaysia. One of a series of reports addressing subsidies for biofuels in selected developing countries. The Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  52. Lund P (2009) Effects of energy policies on industry expansion in renewable energy. Renewable Energy 34:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Magdoff F (2008) The political economy and ecology of biofuels. Monthly Rev July–August:34–50Google Scholar
  54. Mathews J (2007) Biofuels: what a biopact between North and South could achieve. Energy Policy 35:3550–3570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. MoE (2007) Policy DB Details: Thailand. Renewable energy and energy efficiency partnership. Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  56. Molle F, Floch P, Promphaking B, and Blake DJH (2009). “Greening Isaan”: Politics, Ideology, and Irrigation Development in Northeast Thailand. In: F. Molle, T. Foran, and M. Käkönen (eds). Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livelihoods and Governance, pp. Earthscan, London, pp. 253–282.Google Scholar
  57. Naylor RL, Liska AJ, Burke MB, Falcon WP, Gaskell JC, Rozelle SD, Cassman KG (2007) The ripple effect: biofuels, food security, and the environment. Environment 49:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH (2008a) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH (2008b) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from cassava in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH, Garivait S (2007a) Energy balance and GHG-abatement cost of cassava utilization for fuel ethanol in Thailand. Energy Policy 35:4585–4596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH, Garivait S (2007b) Fossil energy savings and GHG mitigation potentials of ethanol as a gasoline substitute in Thailand. Energy Policy 35:5195–5205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nguyen TLT, Gheewala SH, Bonnet S (2008) Life cycle cost analysis of fuel ethanol produced from cassava in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:564–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nunt-Jaruwong S (2008) Thailand renewable energy policy – the potential for electricity from dendro-power (summary). Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  64. OECD (2008) Rising food prices: causes and consequences. Paper prepared for the DAC High Level Meeting, 20–21 May 2008Google Scholar
  65. OEPP (2000) Thailand’s Initial National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (MOSTE)Google Scholar
  66. Oxfam (2008) Another inconvenient truth: how biofuel policies are deepening poverty and accelerating climate change. Oxfam, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Pleanjai, S., Gheewala, S. H. and Garivait S. (2004). Environmental Evaluation of Biodiesel Production from Palm Oil in a Life Cycle Perspective. in The Joint International Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE)Google Scholar
  68. Pleanjai S, Gheewala SH, Garivait S (2009a) Greenhouse gas emissions from production and use of palm methyl ester in Thailand. International Journal of Global Warming (in press)Google Scholar
  69. Pleanjai S, Gheewala SH, Garivait S (2009b) Greenhouse gas emissions from production and use of used cooking oil methyl ester as transport fuel in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(9): 873–876Google Scholar
  70. Peskett L, Slater R, Stevens C, Dufey A (2007) Biofuels, agriculture and poverty reduction. Natural Resource Perspectives 107. Overseas Development Institute (ODI)Google Scholar
  71. Phalakornkulea C, Petiruksakula A, Puthavithi W (2009) Biodiesel production in a small community: Case study in Thailand. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(3):129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Praiwan Y (2008) Shell delays E20 on supply concerns: tight ethanol market may ease by year-end. Bangkok Post, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  73. Prakash A (2008) Cassava: international market profile. Background paper for the competitive commercial agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (CCAA) study. Trade and Markets Division: Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  74. Prasertsan S, Sajjakulnukit B (2006) Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: potential, opportunity and barriers. Renewable Energy 31:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Preechajarn S, Prasertsri P, Kunasirirat M (2008) Thailand Bio-Fuels Annual 2008 GAIN Report – Global Agriculture Information Network. Global Agriculture Information Network (GAIN), USDA Foreign Agricultural ServiceGoogle Scholar
  76. Prueksakorn K, Gheewala SH (2008) Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel from Jatropha curcas L. in Thailand. Environ Sci Technol 42:3388–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Puppán D (2002) Environmental evaluation of biofuels. Periodica Polytechnica Ser Soc Man Sci 10:95–116Google Scholar
  78. Rajagopal D, Zilberman D (2007) Review of environmental, economic and policy aspects of biofuels. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  79. RCP (2006) The prototype of the community bio-diesel project. The Royal Chitralada Projects (RCP), The Crown Property Bureau (CPB), Thailand, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  80. Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doering OC, Hamburg SP, Melillo JM, Wander MM, Parton WJ, Adler PR, Barney JN, Cruse RM, Duke CS, Fearnside PM, Follett RF, Gibbs HK, Goldemberg J, Mladenoff DJ, Ojima D, Palmer MW, Sharpley A, Wallace L, Weathers KC, Wiens JA, Wilhelm WW (2008) Sustainable biofuels redux. Science 322(5898):49–50Google Scholar
  81. Rossi A, Lambrou Y (2008) Gender and equity issues in liquid biofuels production minimizing the risks to maximize the opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  82. Rowe M (2008) Fuelling the debate. Geographical Dossier Special Report:44–51Google Scholar
  83. Sarochawikasit R (2006) Renewable Energy Development and Environment in Thailand. DEDE, Ministry of Energy (MoE), Thailand, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  84. Scharlemann JPW, Laurance WF (2008) How green are biofuels? Science 319:43–44Google Scholar
  85. Schmidt J (2008) System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:350–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. SCOPE (2008) Biofuels: environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use. In: Proceedings of the scientific committee on problems of the environment (SCOPE) international biofuels project rapid assessment, Gummersbach, Germany, 22–25 Sep 2008Google Scholar
  87. SEA-CR (2007) Field survey on sustainable palm oil in Thailand and compliance with international standards. Southeast Asia Consult & Resource Company Ltd, Chiang MaiGoogle Scholar
  88. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T-H (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sengmany P (2007) The environmental impacts of trade liberalization in the bio-diesel section of Lao PDR. National Council of Sciences, Lao PDRGoogle Scholar
  90. Setiadi T, Husaini DA (1996) Palm oil mill effluent treatment by anaerobic baffled reactors: recycle effects and biokinetic parameters. Water Sci Technol 34(11):59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sharlemann J, Laurance W (2008) How green are biofuels? Science 319:52–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Shrestha RM, Pradhan S (2008) CO2 Reduction in transport sector in Thailand: some insights. In: 3rd low carbon society workshop, Tokyo. Asian Institute of Technology, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  93. Shrestha RM, Pradhan S, Liyanage M (2008) Effects of carbon tax on greenhouse gas mitigation in Thailand. Climate Policy 8:140–155Google Scholar
  94. Siriwardhana M, Opathella GKC, Jha MK (2008) Bio-diesel: initiatives, potential and prospects in Thailand: a review. Energy Policy 37(2):554–559Google Scholar
  95. TDRI (1990) Enhancing private sector research and development in Thailand. Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), BangkokGoogle Scholar
  96. Tenenbaum DJ (2008) Food vs fuel: diversion of crops could cause more hunger. Environ Health Perspect 116:A254–A257Google Scholar
  97. Uddin SN, Taplin R, Yu X (2006) Advancement of renewables in Bangladesh and Thailand: policy intervention and institutional settings. Natl Resour Forum 30:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Uhlenbrook S (2008) Biofuel impacts on water: what do we know, and what do we need to know? UNESCO-IHEGoogle Scholar
  99. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2007) Human Development Report. New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  100. Varghese S (2007) Biofuels and global water challenges. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  101. Woods Institute for the Environment (2006) The impacts of large-scale biofuel use on water resources. In: Workshop on the environmental, resource, and trade implications of biofuels, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  102. Wright T (2008) Firms back a plan to put the green in ‘green gold’. The Wall Street J 18 Jan 2008Google Scholar
  103. WRM (2007) Brazil: Agro-fuels represent a new cycle of devastation of the Amazon and Cerrado regions. WRM’s bulletin Nº 116, March 2007. World Rainforest Movement (WRM), UruguayGoogle Scholar
  104. WWAP (2009) United Nations World Water Development Report 3. World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP). Colombella (Perugia), ItalyGoogle Scholar
  105. Yoosin S, Sorapipatana C (2007) A study of ethanol production cost for gasoline substitution in Thailand and its competitiveness. Thammasat Int J Sci Technol 12:69–80Google Scholar
  106. Zuurbier P (2008) Food and energy: impacts on land use. Biofuels and sustainability: Brazilian perspectives. Wageningen UR, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit for Social and Environmental ResearchChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of TechnologyBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations