The Nonduality of Motion and Rest: Sengzhao on the Change of Things

  • Chien-hsing HoEmail author
Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP, volume 9)


In his essay “Things Do Not Move,” Sengzhao (374? − 414 CE), a prominent Chinese Buddhist philosopher, argues for the thesis that the myriad things do not move in time. This view is counter-intuitive and seems to run counter to the Mahayana Buddhist doctrine of emptiness. I assess Sengzhao’s arguments for his thesis, elucidate his stance on the change/nonchange of things, and discuss related problems. I argue that although Sengzhao is keen on showing the plausibility of the thesis, he actually views the myriad things as both changing and unchanging and upholds the nonduality of motion and rest. In fact, the nonmoving thesis follows from the discernment that things change from moment to moment without there being any enduring stuff in the process. Among philosophical works that confer a higher ontological status on nonchange over change, Sengzhao’s essay is unique and well worth pondering.


Sengzhao Chinese Madhyamaka Metaphysic Motion Rest 


  1. Apidamo Jushe Lun 阿毘達磨俱舍論 (The Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, Commentary on the Treasury of Abhidharma). By Vasubandhu. Trans. by Xuanzang 玄奘. T 29, 1558.Google Scholar
  2. Chan, Wing-tsit, ed. and trans. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ho, Chien-hsing. 2013. “Ontic Indeterminacy and Paradoxical Language: An Analysis of Sengzhao’s Linguistic Thought.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12.4: 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ho, Chien-hsing. 2014. “Emptiness as Subject-Object Unity: Sengzhao on the Way Things Truly Are.” In Jeeloo Liu and Douglas Berger, eds., Nothingness in Asian Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 104–118.Google Scholar
  5. Liu Le-heng 劉樂恆. 2010. “Wu Buqian Zhengliang Lun Bianxi 物不遷正量論辨析 (A Critical Analysis of the Wu Buqian Zhengliang Lun).” Hanxue Yanjiu 漢學研究 (Chinese Studies) 28.1: 191–223.Google Scholar
  6. Saigusa, Mitsuyoshi. 1985. Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā-s: Texts and Translations. Tokyo: Daisanbunmei-sha.Google Scholar
  7. Tan, Mingran. 2008. “Emptiness, Being and Non-being: Sengzhao’s Reinterpretation of the Laozi and Zhuangzi in a Buddhist Context.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7.2: 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Weimojie Suoshuo Jing 維摩詰所說經 (The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra). Trans. by Kumārajīva 鳩摩羅什. T 14, 475.Google Scholar
  9. Zhao Lun 肇論 (The Treatise of Sengzhao). By Sengzhao. T. 45, 1858.Google Scholar
  10. Zhaolun Shu 肇論疏 (A Commentary on the Treatise of Sengzhao). By Yuankang. T 45, 1859.Google Scholar
  11. Zhu Weimojiejing 注維摩詰經 (A Commentary on the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra). By Sengzhao. T 38, 1775.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations