Advertisement

The Epistemology and Process of Buddhist Nondualism: The Philosophical Challenge of Egalitarianism in Chinese Buddhism

  • Sandra A. WawrytkoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP, volume 9)

Abstract

The evolving field of neuroscience provides a fresh perspective for understanding and clarifying the nondualistic epistemology of Buddhist philosophy. Its egalitarian adherence to “wisdom embracing all species” required an epistemological shift beyond both egocentric and anthropocentric assumptions, outlined in such texts as the Lotus Sūtra and the Diamond Sūtra. Parallels can be drawn to the Triple Loop learning process, “an ‘epistemo-existential strategy’ for profound change on various levels.” Inherently hierarchical tendencies in Daoist and Confucian philosophies posed a challenge to the egalitarian stance of Buddhist nondualism. Passages from Daoist (Laozi, Zhuangzi), Confucian (Confucius, Mengzi, Xunzi), and Neo-Confucian (Zhu Xi, Wang Yang-ming) texts demonstrate the limits of Chinese nondualism. The hybrid brain cultivated through Buddhist practice was able to maintain the benefits of the task-driven dorsal attentional network (promoting Wisdom), while being grounded in the stimulus-driven ventral attentional network (opening Compassion). The Five Ranks (wu-wei五位) of Chan meticulously trace the process of recognizing the nondualism of deluded mind (the bent) and awakened mind (the straight). The final rank, “Unity Attained,” restores the role of allocentric attention, which has been described as “the basic simplicity of the undyed fabric,” as the default. Thus, inspired by the pedagogy of cognitive dissonance woven into Sanskrit texts, Chinese practitioners deployed their own “circuit-breakers” of ventral attention to disrupt the dogmatic “perseveration” of dorsal attention. The resulting epistemological reorientation reveals the nondualism of reality.

Keywords

Buddhism Egalitarianism Epistemology Neuroscience Nondualism 

References

  1. Addiss, Stephen, Stanley Lombardo, and Judith Roitman, eds. 2008. Zen Sourcebook: Traditional Documents from China, Korea, and Japan, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, Roger, and Henry Rosemont Jr. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, James H. 2000. Zen and the Brain: Toward An Understanding of Meditation and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, Wing-Cheuk. 2010. “Two Dogmas of Critical Buddhism.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37.2: 276–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1957–58. “Transformation of Buddhism in China.” Philosophy East and West 7.3/4: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chong, Kim-Chong. 2016. Zhuangzi’s Critique of the Confucians: Blinded by the Human. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Conze, Edward, trans. 2001. Buddhist Wisdom: The Diamond Sutra and the Heart Sutra. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Dobson, W. A. C. H. 1969. Mencius. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dumoulin, Heinrich. 1988. Zen Buddhism: A History, Vol. 1 India and China. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Fang, Thome H. 1937. “Three Types of Philosophical Wisdom—The Greek, the European, and the Chinese.” http://thomehfang.com/suncrates/Intro3typesofphilosophicwisdom.htm
  12. Fox, Michael D., Maurizio Corbetta, Abraham Z. Snyder, Justin L. Vincent and Marcus E. Raichle. 2006. “Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems.” PNAS 103.26: 10046–10051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu, Charles W., and Sandra A. Wawrytko, trans. 2009. “Dao De Jing 道德經: the Viability and Virtuosity Classic.” In Sandra A. Wawrytko, ed., Chinese Philosophy in Cultural Context: Selected Readings from Essential Sources. San Diego: Montezuma Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Gregory, Peter N. 1983. Chinese Buddhist Hermeneutics: the Case of Hua-Yen.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 51.2: 231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu Shi. 1953. “Ch’an (Zen) Buddhism in China: Its History and Method.” Philosophy East and West 3.1: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inada, Kenneth K. 1969. “Some Basic Misconceptions of Buddhism.” International Philosophical Quarterly 9. 1: 101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lai, Whalen. 2003. “Buddhism in China: A Historical Survey.” In Antonio S. Cua, ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 7–19.Google Scholar
  18. Lau, D. C., trans. 1970. Mencius. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Legge, James. 1935. The Chinese Classics in Five Volumes. Shanghai: Oxford University Press. rpt.Google Scholar
  20. Li Zehou 李澤厚. 1988. Mei de Licheng 美的歷程 (The Path of Beauty—A Study of Chinese Aesthetics), trans. Gong Lizeng. Beijing: Morning Glory Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, Ming-Wood. 1984. “The Problem of the Icchantika in the Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvaṇa Sūtra.” The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 7.1: 57–81.Google Scholar
  22. McGilchrist, Iain. 2009. The Master and His Emissary: the Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Morton, W. S. 1971. “The Confucian Concept of Man: The Original Formulation.” Philosophy East and West 21.1: 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peschl, M.F. 2007. “Triple-Loop Learning as Foundation for Profound Change, Individual Cultivation, and Radical Innovation: Construction Processes beyond Scientific and Rational Knowledge.” Constructivist Foundations 2.2–3: 136–145.Google Scholar
  25. Red Pine, trans. 2012. The Lankavatara Sutra: A Zen Text. Berkeley: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  26. Red Pine, trans. 2006. The Platform Sutra: the Zen Teaching of Hui-Neng. Emeryville: Shoemaker & Hoard.Google Scholar
  27. Schloegl, Irmgard, trans. 1976. The Wisdom of the Zen Masters. New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
  28. Soothill, William E., and Lewis Hodous. 1934. A Dictionary of Chinese Buddhist Terms. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  29. Suzuki, D. T. 1999. Studies in the Laṅkāvatāra Sutra. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  30. Thera, Soma, trans. 1981. The Kalama Sutta: the Buddha’s Charter of Free Inquiry. The Wheel Publication 8; http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/soma/wheel008.html.
  31. Vossel, Simone, Geng, Joy J., and Fink, Gereon R. 2013. “Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems: Distinct Neural Circuits but Collaborative Roles.” Neuroscientist 20.2: 150–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walshe, Maurice, trans. 1995. Agganna Sutta: On Knowledge of Beginnings. http://tipitaka.wikia.com/wiki/Agganna_Sutta
  33. Wang, Eugene Y. 2005. Shaping the Lotus Sutra: Buddhist Visual Culture in Medieval China. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  34. Watson, Burton, trans. 1967. Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Watson, Burton, trans. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Watson, Burton, trans. 1993. The Lotus Sutra. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations