Advertisement

Huainanzi: The Pinnacle of Classical Daoist Syncretism

  • Harold D. Roth
Chapter
Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP, volume 6)

Abstract

This Chapter is a comprehensive study of the Huainanzi, which contends that “Careful analysis of its philosophical positions demonstrates the priority it gives to a cosmology and method of self-cultivation found in the Laozi and Zhuangzi, and argues for its not merely being part of a classical Daoist tradition, but the most complex and sophisticated philosophical expression of that tradition.” It also argues that the Huainanzi is primarily Syncretic with a Daoist cosmology and inner cultivation theory as the context for using ideas from the other main intellectual traditions of the Late Warring States and Early Han. The text shares the cosmology of Dao and its de or potency as well as common practices of self-cultivation, but they diverge in applying these ideas to government. However, the Daoist ideals promoted in this text ultimately failed because of the vagaries and political struggles of its time.

Keywords

Philosophical Position Phenomenal World External Thing Entire Book Myriad Thing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allan, Sarah. 2003. The great one, water, and the Laozi: New light from Guodian. T’oung Pao LXXXIX: 237–285. (A thorough, pioneering study of the “Taiyishengshui” from Guodian.)Google Scholar
  2. Ames, Roger T. 1983. The art of rulership: A study of ancient Chinese political thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Reprinted, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994. (An excellent translation and analysis of chapter 9.)Google Scholar
  3. Ames, Roger T., and D.C. Lau. 1998. Yuan Dao: Tracing Dao to its source, Classics of ancient China. New York: Ballantine Books. (A good translation and provocative study of chapter 1.)Google Scholar
  4. Chen, Yiping 陈一平. 1994. Huainanzi, edited, commented upon, and translated 淮南子校注译. Guangzhou: Guangdong renmin chubanshe. (Useful critical edition that includes modern Chinese translation.)Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Jing 陳靜. 2004. Freedom and order in the study of the Huainanzi 自由與秩序的困惑淮南子研究. Kunming: Yunnan University Press. (An important study of the philosophy of the Huainanzi.)Google Scholar
  6. Csíkszentmihályi, Mark, and Michael Nylan. 2003. Constructing lineages and inventing traditions through exemplary figures in early China. T’oung Pao LXXXIX: 59–99. (This is an superb analysis that challenges the historical accuracy of statements about philosophical schools and lineages in the Shiji and Hanshu.)Google Scholar
  7. Graham, A.C. 1990. How much of Chuang Tzu Did Chuang Tzu Write? In Studies in Chinese philosophy and philosophical literature. Reprinted, Albany: State University of New York Press, 283–321. (A pioneering analysis of authorial voices in the Zhuangzi.)Google Scholar
  8. He, Ning 何寧. 1998. Collected explanations of the Huainanzi 淮南子集釋. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. (Excellent critical edition.)Google Scholar
  9. Hsiao, Kung-chuan. 1979. A history of Chinese political thought, vol. 1., Trans. F.W. Mote. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (The most authoritative study of the development of political philosophy in China.)Google Scholar
  10. Hu Shi 胡適. 1931. The book of the King of Huainan 淮南王書. Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan. Reprinted, Taipei: Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan, 1962. (Classic study of the text and thought in the Huainanzi.)Google Scholar
  11. Kanaya, Osamu 金谷治. 1959. The intellectual world of Lao Zhuang: The thought of Huainanzi 老莊的世界: 淮南子の思想. Kyoto: Heirakuji Bookstore. Reprinted, Kōdansha Gakujutsu Bunko. Tōkyō: Kōdansha, 1992. (The definitive Japanese study of the philosophy of the Huainanzi.)Google Scholar
  12. Kraft, Eva. 1957, 1958. Zum Huai-nan-Tzu. Enfürung, Übersetzung (Kapitel I Und II) Und Interpretation. Monumenta Serica 16: 191–286, 17: 128–207. (A German translation of chapters 1 and 2.)Google Scholar
  13. Kusuyama, Haruki 楠山春樹. (1979–88) Huainanzi Enanji 淮南子, vols. 54, 55, 62. In Shinshaku kanbun taikei 新釋漢文大系. Tokyo: Meiji Shōin. (Contains a superb critical edition and a modern Japanese translation.)Google Scholar
  14. Larre, Claude, Isabelle Robinet, and Elisabeth Rochat de la Vallée. 1993. Les grands traités Du Huainanzi, Variétés Sinologiques, vol. 75. Paris: Institut Ricci. (Excellent French translations of chapters 1, 7, 11, 13, and 18.)Google Scholar
  15. Lau, D.C. 1992. Concordance to the Huainanzi 淮南子逐字索引, The institute for Chinese studies Chinese text concordance series. Hong Kong: Commercial Press. (The new standard critical edition and concordance to the Huainanzi.)Google Scholar
  16. Leblanc, Charles. 1985. Huai-nan Tzu: Philosophical synthesis in early Han thought: The idea of resonance (Kan-Ying) with a translation and analysis of chapter six. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. (A classic study and translation of chapter 6.)Google Scholar
  17. Leblanc, Charles. 1993. Huainanzi. In Early Chinese texts: A bibliographical guide, ed. Michael Loewe, 189–195. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China and The Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Leblanc, Charles. 1995. From cosmology to ontology through resonance: A Chinese interpretation of reality. In Beyond textuality: Asceticism and violence in anthropological interpretation, ed. Gilles Bibeau and Ellen Corin, 57–77. Paris/Berlin: Mouton de Bruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Leblanc, Charles, and Rémi Mathieu. 1992. Mythe et Philosophie à l’Aube de la Chine impériale: Études Sur Le Huainanzi. Montréal/Paris: Presses de l’Université de Montréal/De Boccard. (A superb collection of essays on the text and thought of the Huainanzi).Google Scholar
  20. Leblanc, Charles, and Rémi Mathieu, (eds.). 2003. Philosophes taoïstes, 2: Huainan zi. Texte traduit, présenté et annoté, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Éditions Gallimard. (The first complete translation of the Huainanzi into a Western language.)Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, Mark Edward. 1999. Writing and authority in early China. Albany: SUNY Press. (An excellent overview).Google Scholar
  22. Liu, Wendian 劉文典. 1923. Huainan honglie with collected (textual) explications 淮南鴻烈集解. Shanghai: The Commercial Press. (A relatively poor edition often cited because of its extremely useful collection of the textual scholarship of Qing critics.)Google Scholar
  23. Liu, Xiaogan. 1993. Classifying the Chuang Tzu chapters. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Monograph in Chinese Studies. (A superb analysis of the philosophical positions in the Zhuangzi.)Google Scholar
  24. Major, John S. 1993. Heaven and earth in early Han thought: Chapters three, four and five of the Huainanzi, SUNY series in Chinese philosophy and culture. Albany: State University of New York Press. (A superb and insightful translation of the three most technically challenging chapters with copious explanatory notes.)Google Scholar
  25. Major, John, Sarah A. Queen, Andrew S. Meyer, and Harold D. Roth (trans, eds, ann.). 2010. The Huainanzi: A guide to the theory and practice of government in early Han China, by L iu An, King of Huainan. New York: Columbia University Press. (This is the first complete English translation of the Huainanzi.)Google Scholar
  26. Murray, Judson. 2004. A study of ‘Yaolüe’ 要略, ‘A summary of the essentials’: Understanding the Huainanzi through the point of view of the author of the postface. Early China 29: 45–110. (An insightful analysis of the philosophy of the Huainanzi as seen through its final chapter.)Google Scholar
  27. Puett, Michael. 2000. Violent misreadings: The hermeneutics of cosmology in the Huainanzi. In Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 72: 29–47. (Excellent analysis of the famous cosmogonic opening passage in Huainanzi 2.)Google Scholar
  28. Queen, Sarah A. 2001. Inventories of the past: Re-thinking the ‘school’ affiliation of the Huainanzi. Asia major, Third series, 14(1): 51–72. (Insightful article challenging the accuracy of Sima Tan’s classification of philosophical schools.)Google Scholar
  29. Queen, Sarah A. 2008. The creation and domestication of the techniques of Lao-Zhuang: Anecdotal narrative and philosophical argumentation in Huainanzi Chapter 12, ‘Reponses of the way’ (Dao Ying 道應). Asia major, Third series, 21(1). (An excellent analysis of the “reverse commentary” to the Laozi in Huainanzi 12.)Google Scholar
  30. Roth, Harold D. 1991a. Who compiled the Chuang Tzu? In Chinese texts and philosophical contexts: Essays dedicated to Angus C. Graham, 78–128, ed. Henry Rosemont, Jr. LaSalle: Open Court Press. (Study that examines the role of the Huainan philosophical circle in the creation of the Zhuangzi.)Google Scholar
  31. Roth, Harold D. 1991b. Psychology and self-cultivation in early Taoistic thought. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 51(2): 599–650. (Study that presents new analysis of early Daoist philosophy that includes a wider group of texts than Laozi and Zhuangzi.)Google Scholar
  32. Roth, Harold D. 1992. The textual history of the Huainanzi, Association for Asian studies monograph 46. Ann Arbor: The Association for Asian Studies. (The authoritative study on the history, text, and editions of the Huainanzi.)Google Scholar
  33. Roth, Harold D. 1994. Redaction Criticism and the early history of Taoism. Early China 19: 1–46. (Analysis of the relationships among the four “Xinshu” chapters of the Guanzi.)Google Scholar
  34. Roth, Harold D. 1999. Original Tao: Inward training and the foundations of Taoist mysticism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Roth, Harold D. 2000. Bimodal mystical experience in the Qiwulun of Chuang Tzu. Journal of Chinese Religions 28: 1–20. (A study examining mysticism in the Zhuangzi).Google Scholar
  36. Ryden, Edmund. 1998. Philosophy of peace in Han China: A study of the Huainanzi Ch. 15 on military strategy. Taipei: Taipei Ricci Institute. (Good study and analysis of Huainanzi 15.)Google Scholar
  37. Smith, Kidder. 2003. Sima Tan and the invention of Daoism, ‘Legalism,’ et cetera. Journal of Asian Studies 62(1): 129–156. (An article that argues that Sima Tan actually invented Daoism.)Google Scholar
  38. Vankeerberghen, Griet. 2001. The Huainanzi and L iu An’s claim to moral authority, SUNY series in Chinese philosophy and culture. Albany: State University of New York Press. (The definitive study of the historical circumstances surrounding the creation of the Huainanzi and a keen analysis of its thought.)Google Scholar
  39. Wallacker, Benjamin. 1962. The Huai-nan Tzu, Book eleven: Behavior, culture, and cosmos. New Haven: American Oriental Society. (An accurate but somewhat Boodbergian translation of Huainanzi chapter 11.)Google Scholar
  40. Wallacker, Benjamin. 1972. Liu An, second King of Huai-nan. Journal of the American Oriental Society 92: 36–49. (An excellent biography.)Google Scholar
  41. Yates, Robin. 1997. Five lost classics: Tao, Huang-Lao, and Yin-Yang in Han China. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, Shuangdi 張雙棣. 1997. Huainanzi, edited and explained 淮南子校釋. Beijing: Beijing University Press. (This is the best and most useful critical edition of the Huainanzi.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Religious StudiesBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations