Advertisement

Curriculum as Professional Action

  • David J ElliottEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 7)

Abstract

The culminating issue in any professional framework for music teaching and learning involves complex questions concerning curriculum and instruction. Analyzing the concept of “curriculum” provides a foundation for building answers to some of these questions.

Keywords

Curriculum Development Musical Action Achievement Standard Music Education Praxial Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Apple, M. 2001. Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality. New York: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  2. Benedict, C. K. 2003. Chasing legitimacy: The national music standards viewed through a critical theorist framework. Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  3. Bobbitt, F. 1918. The curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  4. Colwell, R. 2004. A peek at an international perspective on assessment. In Music education entering the 21st century, P. Shand, Nedlands, ed. Western Australia: International Society for Music Education.Google Scholar
  5. Elliott, D. J. 1995. Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Posner, G., and A. Rudnitsky. 1986. Course design. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Tanner, D., and L. Tanner. 1975. Curriculum development: Theory into practice. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations