Reliability Assessment of Underground Pipelines Under Active Corrosion Defects

  • A. Amirat
  • A. Benmoussat
  • K. Chaoui


Reliability assessment of underground pipeline steel structures for hydrocarbon transmission and distribution systems under active corrosion defects has been investigated. The aim of this work is to obtain a decision-making tool for risk-based inspection and maintenance program. The basic idea consists in statistical analysis of corrosion defect measurements in a buried pipeline as to sort out the corresponding depths and lengths after several years of service. As a result steady corrosion rate model is proposed to estimate the growth in the dimensions of corrosion defects. Then, a degradation model based on ASME modified B31G standard is used as a mechanical model in order to assess the failure probability or the reliability index through defect dimensions and associated uncertainties. Meanwhile, the main assumption of the probabilistic analyses for corroded pipelines is the randomness of load and resistance parameters determining the limit state functions. The statistical distribution of the uncertainties in the parameters involved in the limit state functions is modeled using normal and lognormal distributions. The reliability software PHIMECA is used to compute the reliability index β and the probability of failure Pf, when increasing dimensions of the defect within the respective measured values of depth and length during inspection and maintenance operations. The reliability calculation allows carrying out the sensitivity of the variables according to their importance, their mean value and their coefficient of variation. The probability of failure and reliability index are obtained assuming in one hand constant depth of defect with increasing length and in the other hand a relationship between the depth to length corrosion defect ratio is given as a function of reliability index β. The latter can be used as a parameter for risk-based inspection and maintenance operations.


Reliability Analysis Corrosion Underground Pipelines 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Maes M.A, Dann M and Salama, M.M. Influence of grade on the reliability of corroding pipelines, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93(3) (March 2008) 447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Teixeira, A.P, Guedes Soares C, Netto T.A and Estefen S.F. Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 85(4) (April 2008) 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    2000 pipeline investigation report. Report No. P00H0037. Transportation Safety Board of Canada, Hull, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    1999 pipeline investigation report. Report No. P99H0021. Transportation Safety Board of Canada, Hull, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Workshop. Office of Pipeline Safety. US Department of transportation, December 2003.
  6. [6]
    ASME-B31G. Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines — a supplement to ASME B31G code for pressure piping. New York: American Society for Mechanical Engineer, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    CANICSA-ZKWM86. Gas Pipeline Systems. Canadian Standards Association, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ahammed M. Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 75 (1998) 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Caleyo F, Gonzalez J.L. and Hallen J.M. A study on the reliability assessment methodology for pipelines with active corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 79 (2000) 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shipilov S.A, Iain Le May. Structural integrity of aging buried pipelines having cathodic protection. Engineering Failure Analysis 13 (2006) 1159–1176.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Amirat A, Mohamed-Chateauneuf A, Chaoui K. A Reliability assessment of underground pipelines under the combined effect of active corrosion and residual stress. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 83 (2006) 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    PHIMECA Engineering. PHIMECA — reliability-based design and analysis. Users manual, version 1.6, Aubiere, France; 2002.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lemaire M. Evaluation des indices de fiabilité associés à des modèles de mécanique de structure. Revue Française de Mécanique 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Amirat
    • 1
  • A. Benmoussat
    • 2
  • K. Chaoui
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Laboratory LR3MI: mechanics of materials and plant maintenance University Badji MokhtarAnnabaAlgeria
  2. 2.Mechanical departmentUniversity Aboubaker BelkaidTlemcenAlgeria

Personalised recommendations