Skip to main content

Comparison of Methods to Assess the Sustainability of Agricultural Systems: A Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract

Since the 1990s, numerous agri-environmental indicators and indicator-based methods have been developed to assess the adverse effects of cropping and farming systems such as water pollution by nitrates and pesticides, and gaseous emissions due to nitrogen inputs. This wealth of environmental indicators and assessment methods based on indicators raises issues on the quality of the methods and of the indicators, and on the relevancy of results. Evaluation and comparative studies are therefore needed to answer such issues. Here, we present four recent comparative studies selected for their illustrative value, first, to analyse the methodologies used for comparison of methods, and second, to highlight the main results of the four comparisons. The first study involves 23 indicators to address nitrate leaching. The second study involves 43 indicators to address pesticide risk. The third and fourth studies compare environmental assessment methods based on a set of indicators used in French and Upper Rhine plains (France, Germany and Switzerland). Both studies also compare the outputs of the methods and highlight the low degree of convergence between them. The approach proposed in the last study is the most elaborate among the four case studies. It could be used to develop a generic evaluation and comparison methodology. The review of those four case studies shows the need to formalise the methodology underlying any comparison work of indicators or evaluation methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aubry C., Galan M.B., Mazé A. (2005) Garanties de qualité dans les exploitations agricoles: exemples de l’élaboration du référentiel Quali’Terre®; en Picardie, Cah. Agric. 14, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurousseau P. (2004) Agrégation des paramètres et bases mathématiques de combinatoire de facteurs de risque, in: Barriuso E. (Ed.), Estimation des risques environnementaux des pesticides, INRA Editions, Paris, pp. 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C., Girardin P. (2003) How to validate environmental indicators, Agr. Syst. 76, 639–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C., Girardin P., Van der Werf H.G.M. (1997) Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems, Eur. J. Agron. 7, 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C., Gaillard G., Baumgartner D., Freiermuth Knuchel R., Reinsch M., Brauner R., Unterseher E. (2006) Méthodes d’évaluation agri-environnementale des exploitations agricoles : Comparaison des méthodes INDIGO, KUL/USL, REPRO et SALCA, ITADA, Colmar, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C., Guichard L., Makowski D., Aveline A., Girardin P., Plantureux S. (2008) Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cariolle M. (2002) DEAC – Nitrogen: means to diagnose nitrogen leaching on a mixedfarm scale, in: Proceedings of the 65th Institut International de Recherches Betteravières Congress, Brussels, Belgium, 13–14 February 2002, pp. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloquell-Ballester V.A., Monterde-Diaz R., Santamarina-Siurana M.C. (2006) Indicators validation for the improvement of environmental and social impact quantitative assessment, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 26, 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CORPEN (2006) Des indicateurs AZOTE pour gérer des actions de maîtrise des pollutions à l’échelle de la parcelle, de l’exploitation et du territoire, Ministère de l’Écologie et du Développement Durable, http://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/maquette_azote29_09.pdf, Paris, p. 113.

  • Devillers J., Farret R., Girardin P., Rivière J.-L., Soulas G. (2005) Indicateurs pour évaluer les risques liés à l’utilisation des pesticides, Lavoisier, Londres, Paris, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert H., Breitschuh G., Sauerbeck D. (2000) Criteria and standards for sustainable agriculture, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 163, 337–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2005) Agriculture and environment in EU-15; the IRENA indicator report, European Environmental Agency (EEA), Copenhagen (Danemark), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRCA Centre (2002) DIAGE, manuel d’utilisation et logiciel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galan M.B., Peschard D., Boizard H. (2007) ISO 14 001 at the farm level: analysis of five methods for evaluating the environmental impact of agricultural practices, J. Environ. Manage. 82, 341–352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer J., Bäuerle A.S. (2000) Betriebliche Umweltinformationstechniken für die Landwirschaft, Ber. Landwirtsch. 78, 354–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardin P., Devillers J., Thybaud E., Soulas G. (2007) Programme “Indicateurs et pesticides” Phase II : Validation et proposition d’amélioration d’indicateurs “pesticides”, Ministère de l’Écologie et du Développement Durable, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlass G., Halberg N., Verschuur G. (2003) Input output accounting systems in the European community – an appraisal of their usefulness in raising awareness of environmental problems, Eur. J. Agron. 20, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberg N., van der Werf H.M.G., Basset-Mens C., Dalgaard R., de Boer I.J.M. (2005) Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems, Livest. Prod. Sci. 96, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart A., Brown C.D., Lewis K.A., Tzilivakis J. (2003) p-EMA (II): evaluating ecological risks of pesticides for a farm-level risk assessment system, Agronomie 23, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich E.G., Pease W.S., Koshland C.P. (1997) Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: a comparison of six methods, Sci. Total Environ. 196, 13–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsbergen K.J. (2003) Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Bilanzierungsmodells zur Bewertung der Nachhaltigkeit landwirtschaftlicher Systeme, Shaker (Halle, Univ., Habil.-Schr., 2002), Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kägi T., Bockstaller C., Gaillard G., Hayer F., Mamy L., Strassemeyer J. (2008) Multicriteria evaluation of RA and LCA assessment methods considering pesticide application, European Network for Durable Exploitation of crop protection strategies (ENDURE), Internal report, p. 43, http://www.endure-network.eu/.

  • Kirchmann H., Thorvaldsson G. (2000) Challenging targets for future agriculture, Eur. J. Agron. 20. 12, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach J., Petzoldt C., Degni J., Tette J. (1992) A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin, 8 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent F., Vertès F., Farrugia A., Kerveillant P. (2000) Effets de la conduite de la prairie pâturée sur la lixiviation du nitrate. Proposition pour une maîtrise du risque à la parcelle, Fourrages 164, 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Ridaura S., van Keulen H., van Ittersum M.K., Leffelaar P.A. (2005) Multi-scale methodological framework to derive criteria and indicators for sustainability evaluation of peasant natural resource management systems, Environ. Dev. Sustain. 7, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord E.I., Anthony S.G., Goodlass G. (2002) Agricultural nitrogen balance and water quality in the UK, Soil Use Manage. 18, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maud J., EdwardsJones G., Quin F. (2001) Comparative evaluation of pesticide risk indices for policy development and assessment in the United Kingdom, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 86, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Aurich A. (2005) Economic and environmental analysis of sustainable farming practices – a Bavarian case study, Agr. Syst. 86, 190–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard J.M., Cerf M., Guichard L., Jeuffroy M.H., Makowski D. (2002) Which decision support tools for the environmental management of nitrogen? Agronomie 22, 817–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell G., May A., Mc Donald A. (1995) PICABUE: a methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development, Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 2, 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardo M., Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S. (2005) Tools for composite indicators building. Joint Research Center, European Commission, Ispra (Italy), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek Th., Huguenin-Elie O., Dubois D., Gaillard G. (2005) Ökobilanzierung von Anbausystemen im schweizerischen Acker- und Futterbau, Schriftenreihe der FAL 58, Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, 155 p., Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oenema O., van Liere L., Schoumans O. (2005) Effects of lowering nitrogen and phosphorus surpluses in agriculture on the quality of groundwater and surface water in the Netherlands, J. Hydrol. 304, 289–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payraudeau S., van der Werf H.M.G. (2005) Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methods, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 107, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus J., Leendertse P.C. (2000) The environmental yardstick for pesticides: a practical indicator used in the Netherlands, Crop Prot. 19, 637–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus J., Leenderste P., Bockstaller C., Fomsgaard I., Gutsche V., Lewis K., Nilsson C., Pussemier L., Trevisan M., van der Werf H., Alfarroba F., Blümel S., Isart J., McGrath D., Seppälä T. (1999) Comparing environmental risk indicators for pesticides. Results of the European CAPER project. Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Utrecht, p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reus J., Leenderste P., Bockstaller C., Fomsgaard I., Gutsche V., Lewis K., Nilsson C., Pussemier L., Trevisan M., van der Werf H., Alfarroba F., Blümel S., Isart J., McGrath D., Seppälä T. (2002) Comparing and evaluating eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommandations for future use, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 90, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley J. (2001a) The indicator explosion: local needs and international challenges, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 87, 119–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley J. (2001b) Indicator quality for assessment of impact of multidisciplinary systems, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 87, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romstad E. (1999) Theorical considerations in the development of environmental indicators, in: Brouwer F.M., Crabtree J.R. (Eds.), Environmental indicators and agricultural policy, CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 13–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosnoblet J., Girardin P., Weinzaepflen E., Bockstaller C. (2006) Analysis of 15 years of agriculture sustainability evaluation methods, in: Fotyma M., Kaminska B. (Eds.), 9th ESA Congress, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 707–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossier D., Gaillard G. (2004) Ökobilanzierung des Landwirtschaftsbetriebs: Méthode und Anwendung in 50 Landwirtschaftsbetrieben, 53, p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schärlig A. (1985) Décider sur plusieurs critères. Panorama de l’aide à la décision multicritère, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solagro (2000) DIALECTE, Diagnostic Liant Environnement et Contrat Territorial d’Exploitation ; manuel d’utilisation et logiciel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solagro (2001) DIALOGUE, Diagnostic Agri-environnemental Global d’exploitation agricole ; manuel et logiciel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Berge H.F.M., Burgers S.L.G.E., Van der Meer H.G., Schröder J.J., Van der Schoot J.R., Van Dijk J.R. (2007) Residual inorganic soil nitrogen in grass and maize on sandy soil, Environ. Pollut. 145, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen M.A., de Boer I.J.M. (2005) Evaluation of indicators to assess the environmental impact of dairy production systems, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 111, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M.A. (1990) Determining Impact significance in EIA: a review of 24 methodologies, J. Environ. Manage. 30, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant M., Jouany J., Devillers J. (1995) A multicriteria estimation of the environmental risk of chemicals with the SIRIS method, Toxicol. Model. 1, 57–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf H.G.M., Petit J. (2002) Evaluation of environmental impact of agroculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 93, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf H.M.G., Zimmer C. (1998) An indicator of persticide environmental impact based on a fuzzy expert system, Chemosphere 36, 2225–2249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vercruysse F., Steurbaut W. (2002) POCER, the pesticide occupational and environmental risk indicator, Crop Prot. 21, 307–315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilain L., Boisset K., Girardin P., Guillaumin A., Mouchet C., Viaux P., Zahm F. (2008) La méthode IDEA: indicateur de durabilité des exploitations agricoles: guide d’utilisation, 3rd edition, Educagri, Dijon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The comparison of 43 pesticide indicators was sponsored by the French Ministry for Ecology and Sustainable Development. The comparison work in Picardie received financial support from the Picardie administrative region (“Conseil Régional de Picardie”) and the French government’s ADEME agency (“Agence pour l’Environnement et la Maîtrise de l’Énergie”). The research within the COMETE project was partly funded by the ITADA (Institut transfrontalier d’application et de développement agronomique) which is sponsored by the EU (Programme INTERREG 3) as well as the Swiss Confederation and the cantons of Basel-Stadt, Basel-Land and Aargau.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Bockstaller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bockstaller, C., Guichard, L., Keichinger, O., Girardin, P., Galan, MB., Gaillard, G. (2009). Comparison of Methods to Assess the Sustainability of Agricultural Systems: A Review. In: Lichtfouse, E., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Véronique, S., Alberola, C. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics