Agency with Impairments of Movement

  • Jonathan Cole
Chapter

Abstract

When in 1833 Sir Charles Bell (1833) first described movement and position sense (which Sherrington was to term proprioception 60 or so years later), he immediately also saw that often we do not attend to movement.

‘… we use our limbs without being conscious, or at least, without any conception of the thousand parts which must conform to a single act … we stand by so fine an exercise of this power, and the muscles are, from habit, directed with so much precision and with an effort so slight, that we do not know how he stand. But if we attempt to walk on a narrow ledge, or stand in a situation where we are in danger of falling we become subject to apprehension; the actions of the muscles are magnified and demonstrative to the degree in which they are excited.’ Bell 1833 (italics added.)

He was aware that even similar actions can sometimes be automatic and sometimes attended to. The effects of removal of these senses of movement and position sense and of touch were investigated in 1895 by Sherrington and Mott. This was possible by sectioning the dorsal, sensory, roots of a series of monkeys.

References

  1. Bell, Sir C (1833) The hand: its mechanism and vital endowments as evincing design. Bridgewater Lecture Series. London. Pickering reprinted by Pilgrim’s Press, Brentwood, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Brodal A (1973) Self observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. Brain 96:675-694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole J (1995) Pride and a daily marathon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole J (1998) About face. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole JD (2004a) Still lives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole J (2004b) On the relation between sensory input and action. J Motor Behav 36(3):243-244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole J (2007) The phenomenology of agency and intention in the face of paralysis and insentience. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6:309-325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole JD, Montero B (2006) Affective proprioception. Janus Head 9(2):299-320Google Scholar
  9. Cole J, Spalding H (2008) The invisible smile. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole J, Gallagher S, McNeill D (2002) Gesture following deafferentation: a phenomenologically informed experimental study. Phenomenol cogn Sci 1:49-67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole J, Dawson A, Rawlence C, Walker L (2007) Still life in eight movements. Wellcome Trust Sciart projectGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole J, Crowle S, Austwick G and Henderson-Slater D (2009) Exploratory findings in virtual induced agency for phantom limb pain. Disability & Rehabilitation, 10:846-854Google Scholar
  13. Desmond DM, O’Neill K, De Paor H, Mac Derby G, MacLachlan M (2006) Augmenting the reality of phantom limbs; three case studies using an augmented mirror box procedure. J Prosthet Orthot 18(3):74-79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrer C and Frith CD (2002) Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action. Neuroimage, 15:596-603.Google Scholar
  15. ffytche DH, Howard RJ (1999) The perceptual consequences of visual loss; positive pathologies of vision. Brain 122:1247-1260Google Scholar
  16. Fourneret P, Jeannerod M (1998) Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 36(11):1133-1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher S (1986) Lived body and environment. Res Phenomenol 16:139-170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallagher S (2004) Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: a phenomenological critique. Psychopathology 37:8-19 (with a response from Christopher F (2004) Comments on Shaun Gallagher. Psychopathology 37:20-22Google Scholar
  19. Gallagher, S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: OUPGoogle Scholar
  20. Gandevia SC, Killian K, McKenzie DK, Crawford M, Allen GM, Gorman RB, Hales JP (1993) Respiratory sensations, cardiovascular control, kinaesthesia and transcranial stimulation during paralysis in humans. J Physiol 470:85-107Google Scholar
  21. Haggard P, Clark S (2003) Intentional action: conscious experience and neural prediction. Conscious Cogn 12:695-707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5(4):382-385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haggard P and Eimer M. (1999) On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res. 126(1):128-33. Google Scholar
  24. Haggard P and Magno E. (1999) Localising awareness of action with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 127(1):102-7.Google Scholar
  25. Haggard P and Libet B. (2001) Conscious intention and brain activity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, Volume 8, Number 11, pp. 47-64(18) Haggard P. Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cog Science, 9, 6, 290-295Google Scholar
  26. Hill J (2000) Footprints in the snow. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Leder D (1990) The absent body. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  28. Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential). The unconscious initiation of a free voluntary act. Brain 106:623-642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcel A (2002) The sense of agency: awareness and ownership of action. Chapter 2, In: Roessler J, Eilan N (eds) Agency and self-awareness. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 48-93Google Scholar
  30. Mercier C, Reilly KT, Vargas CD, Aballea A, Sirigu A (2006) Mapping phantom movement representations in the motor cortex of amputees. Brain 129(8):2202-2210Google Scholar
  31. Merleau-Ponty M. The Primacy of Perception. Illinois: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Miall RC, Cole JD (2007) Evidence for stronger visuo-motor than visuo-proprioceptive conflict during mirror drawing performed by a deafferented subject and control subjects. Exp Brain Res 176(3):432-439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mott FW, Sherrington CS (1895) Experiments upon the influence of sensory nerves upon movement and nutrition of the limbs. Proc Roy Soc 57:481-488Google Scholar
  34. Mulert C, Menzinger E, Leicht G, Pogarell O, Hegerl U (2005) Evidence for a close relationship between conscious effort and anterior cingulate cortex activity. Int J Psychophysiol 56(1):65-80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy R (1987) The body silent. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Murray CD, Pettifer S, Howard T, Patchick EL, Caillette F, Kulkarni J, Bamford C (2007) The treatment of phantom limb pain using immersive virtual reality: three case studies. Disabil Rehabil 29(18):1465-1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naccache L, Dehaene S, Cohen L, Habert MO, Guichart-Gomez E, Galanaud D, Willer JC (2005) Effortless control: executive attention and conscious feeling of mental effort are dissociable. Neuropsychologia. 43(9):1318-28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olausson H, Lamarre Y, Backlund H, Morin C, Wallin BG, Starck G, Ekholm S, Strigo I, Worsley K, Vallbo AB, Bushnell MC (2002) Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex. Nat Neurosci 5(9):900-904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S (1995) Touching the phantom limb. Nature 377:489-490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reeve C (2002) Nothing is impossible; reflections on a new life. Century, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Reilly KT, Mercier C, Schieber MH, Sirigu A (2006) Persistent hand motor commands in the amputees’ brain. Brain 129(8):2211-2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sacks O (1981) The man who mistook his wife for a hat. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Sacks O (1984) A leg to stand on. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Sherrington C (1900) Cutaneous sensation. In: Schafer EA (ed) Textbook of physiology, Pentland, Edinburgh. p 974Google Scholar
  45. Tsakiris M, and Haggard P (2005) Experimenting with the acting self. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4):387-407Google Scholar
  46. Wegner D (2002) The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Wittgenstein L (1980) Remarks on the philosophy of psychology. Blackwell, Oxford, p31eGoogle Scholar
  48. Wittgenstein L (1981) Zettel, 2nd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Cole
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Neurophysiology, Poole HospitalPooleUK

Personalised recommendations