Advertisement

Gustav Gustavovich Špet (1879–1937)

  • Tatyana Schedrina
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 59)

Abstract

The term “phenomenological aesthetics” was never used by Špet. Yet his approach to aesthetic problems must be defined as phenomenological. As both an analysis of his published works and a historical reconstruction of his manuscripts in the archive show, his treatment of consciousness remained phenomenological throughout his creative work. It was particularly so in his hermeneutical turn toward objects of the cultural sciences, such as linguistics, history, philology, psychology, and aesthetics.

Keywords

Cultural Science Aesthetic Problem Aesthetic Sense Verbal Structure Aesthetic Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Haardt, Alexander. “Gustav Shpet’s Aesthetic Fragments and Roman Ingarden’s Literary Theory: Two Designs for a Phenomenological Aesthetics.” In Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 27, 1991, 17–31.Google Scholar
  2. Haardt, Alexander. Husserl in Rußland. Kunst- und Sprachphänomenologie bei Gustav Špet und Aleksej Losev. Munich: Wilhelm Fink 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Гидини М.К. “  Open image in new window Open image in new window Open image in new window Open image in new window ” In Тво- рческое наследие Густава Густавовича Шпета в контексте философских проблем формировани ия историко-культурного соз- нания (ме ждисциплинарный аспект). Томск: Издательство Томского университета, 2003, 370–78.Google Scholar
  4. Кузнецов В.Г. Open image in new window Open image in new window М.: Издательство МГУ, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. “Об ‘Эстетических фрагментах’ Г.Г. Шпета.” In Начала 1 (1992), 70–88.Google Scholar
  6. Шпет Г. Г. Open image in new window М.: Гермес, 1914.; Gustav Shpet. Appearance and Sense: Phenomenology as the Fundamental Science and its Problems. Trans. Thomas Nemeth, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. Шпет Г. Г. Open image in new window In Контек-ст. Литературнотеоретические исследова-ни ия. М., 1989–92.; Gustav Špet Die Hermeneutik und ihre Probleme [1918]. Ed. A. Haardt and R. DaubeSchackat. Trans. E. Freiberger and A. Haardt. Freiburg: Karl Alber, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Шпет Г. Г. Open image in new window ВьIII–III. Пг.: Колос, 1922–1923.; Open image in new window М.: Издател-ьство “Правда,” 1989, 345–472.Google Scholar
  9. Шпет Г. Г. “Проблемы современнойэстетики.” In Open image in new window 1 (1923), 43–78.Google Scholar
  10. Шпет Г. Г. Open image in new window Логос 7 (1996); Логос 1 (1998).Google Scholar
  11. Шпет Г. Г. Open image in new window Ч. I. Гл. VII. Вопросы философии 12 (2002).Google Scholar
  12. Щедрина Т. Г. Open image in new window Open image in new window Open image in new window ”: М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatyana Schedrina
    • 1
  1. 1.Moscow Pedagogical State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations