Income’s Differential Influence on Judgments of Life Versus AffectiveWell-Being
Findings are presented indicating that measures of subjective well-being can be ordered along a dimension varying from evaluative judgments of life at one end to experienced affect at the other. A debate in recent decades has focused on whether increasing income raises the experience of well-being. We found that judgment measures are more strongly associated with income and with the long-term changes of national income. Measures of affect showed lower correlations with income in cross-sectional analyses, as well as lower associations with long-term rising income. Measures of concepts such as “Happiness” and “Life Satisfaction” appear to be saturated with varying mixtures of judgment and affect, and this is reflected in the degree to which they correlate with income. The results indicate that measures of well-being fall along one dimension with different factors influencing scores at each end. Both types of well-being, judgment and affect, show very similar patterns of declining marginal utility with increasing income.
KeywordsLife Satisfaction Marginal Utility Evaluative Judgment Income Change Social Indicator Research
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (2002). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. In J. T. Cacioppo, G. G. Berntson, et al. (Eds.), Foundations in social neuroscience (pp. 493–522). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2006). Penn World Table Version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income, and Prices, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, B., & Wolfers. J. (2008, April 15). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox. Working Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121237
- Veenhoven, R. (2008). World database of happiness, Trends in nations. Roterdam: Erasmus University, September 10, 2008. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl
- World Bank. (2005–2007). World development indicators http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0,,contentMDK:21725423~pagePK:64133150~piPK:6413 3175~theSitePK:239419,00.html