The Clark County Monitoring System – An Early Warning Indicator System for Clark County, Nevada

  • Sheila Conway
  • Jeremy Aguero
  • Irene L. Navis
Part of the Community Quality-of Life Indicators book series (CQLI, volume 1)

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Energy proposed shipping 77,000 metric tons of high-level nuclear waste from civilian nuclear reactor sites and weapons facilities from throughout the country through Clark County, Nevada on its way for permanent geological burial at a repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. This proposal is met with steadfast concern and opposition by Clark County residents and decision makers. The primary areas of concern include potential stigma-related impacts to the area’s tourism economy, negative quality of life impacts, and public health and safety issues. In response to these concerns, Clark County and its incorporated jurisdictions have developed an indicator based monitoring program that serves as an ‘‘early warning system’’ of changes occurring to the area’s socio-economic, fiscal, environmental, and public health and safety well-being. This chapter discusses the reasons the monitoring program was developed; describes how the monitoring program was designed and implemented; details the components and methodology used in developing each of its components; summarizes the lessons learned in implementing a monitoring program; and concludes with a look forward to the future for monitoring.

Keywords

Monitoring Program Emergency Medical Service Nuclear Waste Community Indicator Location Quotient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Chamber of Commerce Executives. (2006). American Chamber of Commerce Researchers Association Cost of Living Index. Louisville, Kentucky: ACCE.Google Scholar
  2. Clark County, Nevada. (2002, February). Clark County impact assessment report. Clark County Comprehensive Planning, Nuclear Waste Division, Clark County Nevada.Google Scholar
  3. Cobb, C., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from the history of social Indicators. San Francisco: Redefining Progress.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, C. (2000). Measurement tools and quality of life. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://www.rprogress.org
  5. Hachman, E. (1994). Memorandum on the Hachman Index. Salt Lake City Utah: University of Utah Bureau of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Hambleton, R. (2005). New leadership for 21st century local democracy. Future of Local Government Summit 2005. College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs: University of Illinois Chicago, Available at: http://www.urbanlife2005.com/proceedings/keynotes/Robin_Hambleton.pdf.
  7. Hammond, A., Rodenberg, E., Bryant, D., & Woodward, R. (1995). Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Hart, M. (1999). Guide to sustainable community indicators. QLF/Atlantic, Maine: Center of the Environment.Google Scholar
  9. Higgs, G., & White, S. (2000). Alternatives to census-based indicators of social disadvantage in rural communities. Progress in Planning, 15, 1–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Innis, J. E. (1990). Knowledge and public policy: The search for meaningful indicators. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Maclaren, V. (1996). Developing indicators of urban sustainability: A focus on the Canadian experience.Toronto: Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research.Google Scholar
  12. Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development: A report to the Ballaton Group. Hartland, Vermont: The Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Murtagh, A. (1996). The statistical evaluation of ecological indicators. Ecological Applications, 6(1), 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Okubo, D. (2000). The community visioning and strategic planning handbook. Denver, Colorado: National Civic League Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pal, L. A. (1997). Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times. Toronto: ITP Nelson.Google Scholar
  16. Phillips, R. (2005). Community indicators measuring systems. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  17. Sawicki, D. (2002). Improving community indicator systems: Injecting more social science into the folk movement. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Urban Environmental Research. (2002). Clark County Yucca Mountain impact assessment report. Clark County Comprehensive Planning, Nuclear Waste Division, Clark County Nevada. Available at: http://www.co.clark.nv.us/comprehensive_planning/NuclearWaste/pdf/ClarkCountyYuccaMountainImpactAssessmentReportFeb02.pdf.
  19. Urban Environmental Research. (2005). An update of the projected impacts to Clark County and local governmental public safety agencies resulting from the transportation of high-level nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain. Clark County Comprehensive Planning, Nuclear Waste Division, Clark County Nevada.Google Scholar
  20. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Office of Domestic Preparedness. (2003). Urban areas security initiative grant program fiscal year 2003. Program Guidelines and Application Kit. Retrieved from, http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/
  21. Wong, C. (2000). Indicators in use: Challenges to urban and environmental planning in Britain. Town Planning Review,71(2), 213–239.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheila Conway
    • 1
  • Jeremy Aguero
    • 2
  • Irene L. Navis
    • 3
  1. 1.Urban Environmental Research LLCNevadaUSA
  2. 2.University of NevadaLas VegasUSA
  3. 3.Department of Comprehensive PlanningClark CountyUSA

Personalised recommendations