A Planning Support System for Terror-Resistant Urban Communities

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Geotechnologies and the Environment book series (GEOTECH, volume 2)

Abstract

The shocking terrorist attacks that took place in New York (2001) and London (2005) have raised serious concerns about the safety of cities and the need for identifying potential threats and preparing preventive measures. There is a gap in the literature, where on the one hand, planning for terror is discussed at the federal level (large scope), and on the other hand, at a site-specific level (small scope). The fact is that there is very little planning research at the urban community level (medium scope). The research presented here aims to start to fill this gap by developing a Community Evacuation Planning Support System (CE-PSS) to aid urban communities identify likely community terror targets and shelters.The CE-PSS was developed using ArcGIS® 9.2 and two extensions – ESRI’s® Network Analyst and Placeways’™ CommunityViz®. By comparing the capacity and location of potential targets with that of potential shelters, shortcomings in a community’s readiness for terror attacks can be detected. With such knowledge, planners, citizens, and community leaders can address these issues in revising their comprehensive plans. As planners are charged with paying special attention to the long-term and interrelated implications of their decisions, preparing for possible terror attack is an essential consideration in today’s planning paradigm.

Keywords

Planning support system Target Shelter Terrorism hazard Community Evacuation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Planning Association (APA). (2004). Safe Growth America Checklist. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.Google Scholar
  2. Amur, N.T. (2005). Homing in. The American City & County 120(5), 50–55.Google Scholar
  3. Belhadj, J.S. (2008). Anticipating urban evacuations: a planning support system for impact reduction. University of Cincinnati, College of DAAP, School of Planning. http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/view.cgi?acc_num=ucin1203967246.Accessed September 24, 2008.
  4. Bronzini, M., Kicinger, R. (2006). Conceptual model of a self-organizing traffic management hazard response system. Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, M., Chen, L., Miller-Hooks, E. (2007). Traffic signal timing for urban evacuation. Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 133(1), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudley, M. (2001). Sprawl as strategy: city planners face the bomb. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(1), 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003). Integrating manmade hazards into mitigation planning. Version 2.0. FEMA. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=1915. Accessed 20 July 2007.
  8. Flint, A. (2005). Both safe and sorry? Planning, 71(6), 4–9.Google Scholar
  9. Gall, M. (200). Where to go? strategic modeling of access to emergency shelters in Mozambique. Disasters, 28(1), 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geertman, S., Stillwell, J. (2004). Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodno, J.B. (2005). Saying no to sabotage. Planning, 71(7), 10–15.Google Scholar
  12. Gursky, E. (2004). Schools as shelters: anticipating 21st-century terrorist threats: how schools may be used to shelter and serve communities in times of need. HPAC Engineering, 49–53.Google Scholar
  13. Han, L.D., Yuan, F., Urbanik II, T. (2007). What is an effective evacuation operation? Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 133(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holzheimer, T. (2004). Planning in an era of heightened security: making communities safer places. Practicing Planner, 2(1), http://www.planning.org/practicingplanner/member/04spring/feature.htm. Accessed September 21, 2008.
  15. Hopkins, L.D., Nikhil, K., Varkki, G.P. (2005). Representing urban development plans and regulations as data: a planning data model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32, 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ke, M. (1994). Ancient wall in Xian. Beijing Review, 37(13), 26–27.Google Scholar
  17. Klosterman, R. (2001). Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer-aided planning. In: R.K. Brail and R.E. Klosterman (Eds), Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models, and visualization tools. (pp. 1–25). Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kongsomsaksakul, S., Yang, C., Chen, A. (2005). Shelter location-allocation model for flood evacuation planning. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 4237–4252.Google Scholar
  19. Krohe Jr., J. (2005). It's dangerous out there, Planning, 71(5), 24–29.Google Scholar
  20. Laefer, D.F., Pradhan, A.R., Koss, A. (2006). GIS-based disaster management systems: a cogent data framework. Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers.Google Scholar
  21. Light, J. (2004). Urban planning and defense planning, past and future. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin, P., Lo, S.M., Huang, H.C., Yuen, K.K. (2008). On the use of multi-stage time-varying quickest time approach for optimization of evacuation planning. Fire Safety Journal, 43(4), 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, H.X., Ban, J.X., Ma, W., Mirchandani, P.B. (2007). Model reference adaptive control framework for real-time traffic management under emergency evacuation. Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 133(1), 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mól, A.C.A., Jorge, C.A.F., Couto, P.M. (2008). Using a game engine for vr simulations in evacuation planning. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 28(3), 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patterson, S.A., Apostolakis, G.E. (2007). Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 1183–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, S.D. (2006). Inter-agency collaboration and consequence management: an all-hazard approach to emergency incident response. Website: http://www.respondersafetyonline.com/500/Issue/Article/False/17938/Issue. Accessed 8 August, 2008.
  27. Yazici, M.A., Ozbay, K. (2007). Impact of probabilistic road capacity constraints on the spatial distribution of hurricane evacuation shelter capacities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zepeda, C., Sol, D. (2007). Planning using answer set programming: an initial approach. Engineering Letters, 15(2), 240–249.Google Scholar
  29. Zerger, A., Smith, D.I. (2003). Impediments to using GIS for real-time disaster decision support. Computers, Environment & Urban Systems, 27(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ziliaskopoulos, A.K. (2000). A linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transportation Science, 34(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PlanningUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations